| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,087 Posts1,055,982 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2015 Posts: 11,054 Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums | | Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums Joined: May 2015 Posts: 11,054 | I believe your #1 photo is the correct position for the bushings. It will allow the cross to move around, but the two yokes should be positioned by the bushings in the transmission and torque tube. If they were installed in the #2 position, there's a possibility of the cross hitting the ends of the bushings (the ends with the taper.)
Generally when a u-joint is disassembled, it should be put back together in the same position it was originally. In other words, the same trunnion bushing on the same yoke ear and on the same end of the cross. But if it was previously assembled incorrectly then all bets are off.
I'm not understanding when you mention slots on the trunnions. If you mean the faces where the bolts go thru, the trunnion bushings should fit into the recesses of the front yoke. If they were backward, there would be a gap between the bushing and the cutout in the front yoke. I believe the mating surface should be lined up with the center of the bushings.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truckFollow this saga in Project JournalPhotos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together. | | |
| |
| |