| |
Labor Day Putting down your wrenches or time for MORE wrenching? 
Plenty of places to share. | | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,020 Posts1,055,267 Members48,418 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2014 Posts: 4,473 Moderator, Electrical Bay | | Moderator, Electrical Bay Joined: Mar 2014 Posts: 4,473 | One other thing that should be mentioned. The GM engineers had less concern about bias in the AD springs than they had in the later applications because with the torque tube, differential rotation couldn't happen. Their concern about spring bias would have been limited to (a) ride quality (b) cornering and safety concerns.
My point in mentioning this: installing an open driveshaft rear end will relocate and alter things. The original springs were designed with an offset center pin and a different system of downward weight distribution. To me it comes down to common sense...the further back you slide the rear end the more you alter how the springs are going to work...especially the way they're pinned together. Further back...stiffer. Hope this makes sense.
~ Jon 1952 1/2 ton with 1959 235 | T5 with 3.07 rear end
| | |
| |
| |