Originally Posted by klhansen
I'm good with "monumental". thumbs_up
I was just trying to be mathematically correct. smile
I feel like beating a dead horse today. smile
Since you may well be our resident mathematician (That position pays more, so you may be due back pay from the administrator) I have a question for you.
If the distance between the front cab mount to the front radiator support is longer than the distance between the front cab mount and the rear cab mount, would that lead to a "proportional" effect (one to one ratio), or an "exponential" effect, whereas, as the misalignment along the vertical axis of the cab mounts becomes greater, the misalignment measured at the front radiator support increases by a mathematically increasing amount which is not proportional to distance measured at the cab mounts?
I believe that we have ventured away from mathematics, and have entered the realm of geometry.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission