| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,083 Posts1,055,967 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2014 Posts: 892 | Various filter research I've read indicates that the K&N flows better than paper but catches less dirt. I have looked but haven't found definitive reports showing the effectiveness of oil bath vs paper. I know that heavy truck applications went to paper later than cars and that optional heavy service air cleaners on truck tended to be oil bath well into the sixties. They are certainly messy and time consuming to renew compared to changing a paper filter. Oil-bath cleaners would be more expensive to manufacture also. I have two carbs with oil-bath cleaners and they kept the previous engine clean for ~200,000 miles till it burnt a piston. I clean them once every couple of years or when there is dirt in the bottom of the oil bath, maybe 15,000 miles or so. 1951 3800 1-ton"Earning its keep from the get-go"In the DITY Gallery1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971. | | |
| |
| |