| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,095 Posts1,056,479 Members48,444 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | Catman: The previous two posts have pretty well covered the info you asked about and the only reasom I'm chiming in is not to tell you what I have but only to clarify the linkage point. Using the stock lower pivot and rod I had no modification at all to the linkage that came with my intake from Stovebolt Engine Co. I did have to cut one of my shift levers and shorten it to clear the rear of the intake. Perhaps 1/4" is all it needed. I did the grinding business but agree that milling the surfaces to match would have been a better choice. Still looking for proper studs for holding the manifolds to the head.
Overboring could cause some heat issues but I doubt even .080 is enough to cause that. Pistons are availabe in nearly any size for the engine. I did mill the head about .010-.020 to clean it up and raise the compression a bit but mostly to make sure it hadn't warped. Money spent on the head pays a bigger dividend than about anything else you can do.
With your low member number I see you are not a new member so your familiar with the search feature that has a great deal of info on this popular upgrade. | | |
| |
| |