Originally Posted by coilover
The GM engineers must have figured a rigid box frame can be connected to a flexible "C" channel frame without giving problems. Note on this factory S10 frame the splice (half way between tall cab mount brackets) has a long parabola (Nike "Swoosh") shape cut out to give a rigid to flexible transition area. I'm sure a boxing plate with the right shape is also trouble free. It's the square ends on plate that set up stress cracks. Also, DO NOT have the box plates of thicker material than the frame. If bolts need to be torqued to where they will cave in the boxing plate then weld through tubes from outer to inner surface to take the torque without collapsing.

[img]https://i.postimg.cc/JHRtmTyy/S10-028.jpg[/img]
Hmmm,
I guess metal is really precious. I'm wondering why they didn't run the boxed frame continuous instead of leaving a gap in the middle. ohwell
Bean counters, and maybe engineers trying to save an ounce or two in weight dictated that.
As far as "trouble free" I'm with HRL. More like "trouble delayed". wink


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.