| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,090 Posts1,056,016 Members48,430 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 Sir Searchalot | | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,983 | I agree it sounds crazy. Things were not as anticipated back then. I've seen things like that. They only last a year or two until factory changes to common sense. Sometimes a component was attached to another prior to assembly in truck. They thought it was a good idea. Never realizing it was then "locked" for repair. Hope that is not the case. I don't know 1939 either. We all know that for many years maintenance/repair was not a design parameter. Bolt access was not considered. Not much better now. Pull the motor up to get oil pan off? No problem. Drain and pull the radiator to get fan off? No problem. Can't get the inside starter bolt off without taking tire and inner fender off? No problem. Oil spills all over because filter is mounted horizontally? No problem.
In 60-66 GMC, I have seen factory riveted cross members and factory bolted cross members. On the riveted cross member, motor was too long to remove with 4 sp. Could not get 4 sp out after unbolting from bell housing until rotated, rolled, jammed and slipped down. A 150 lb slug of iron waiting to crush your face and decapitate your fingers. Lots of fun. I would have rather gone to the dentist.
Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn | | |
| |
| |