| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,020 Posts1,055,345 Members48,420 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,518 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2013 Posts: 1,518 | Steering stabilizers are like giving a brain tumor patient an aspirin for his headache- - - - -you're treating the symptom, not the cause of the problem. Get rid of the slack in the tie rods and drag link, fix the kingpins, and align the front end properly and the stabilizer won't be needed. Jerry I just spit my coffee out over the keyboard. The only time I have experienced one of these actually doing some good on all brand new front end parts was on my little T bucket, with a transverse leaf spring and radius arms. And even at that it only helped marginally better to control the bump steer, if one tire went into a low spot in the road at speed. And that I'm sure was because of that particular front end engineering and the time period it was conceived in. 1953 Chevrolet 3100261 cu inch, sm420, 3.55 rear, torque tube still,omaha orange, still 6 volt, RPO green glass, side carrier spare, all done In the DITY GalleryVideo of the 261 running1964 GMC 1000305 Big Block V6, sm420, the next cab off restoration
| | |
| |
| |