| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,069 Posts1,055,896 Members48,428 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,248 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2001 Posts: 1,248 | I can't see any reason it shouldn't work. I know in '59 they changed the cam profile a bit and increased the compression ratio. The engine in 1958 was rated for 145hp/210 lb/ft, in 1959-'62 it was rated 135hp/215 lb/ft. A decrease in hp, but an increase in torque. Of course this was on car engines with a hydraulic cam.
John | | |
|
|
| |
