Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,107 Posts1,056,225 Members48,436 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 5 | I have a odd engine, hope someone has an answer-this engine has two bolts through the valve cover, high water pump, head casting number 3701887, can not find a casting number where the normal 235 numbers are, no numbers ahead of the distributer, the number above the starter is LAQ479604, narrow belts. All I have been able to come up with is maybe a 53 235 w/powerglide, but the valve cover has me scratching my head Thanks | | | | | Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 | The '53 powerglide engine did have the two bolt valve cover. It also has the "captains bars" on the block just above the starter, as does the '54 powerglide.
Should still have the number stamped by the the distributer, however, unless it was a replacement block from the factory.
Finally, it is easy to convert a head to a two bolt cover by installing two longer studs for two of the rocker arm bolts. You can tell by removing the cover and looking to see if there are tapped holes for the four bolt cover.
P.S. I have a '53 235 powerglide head on the shelf, and the casting number is 3701887 - same as yours.
Kurt
Last edited by Kurt_51carryall; 05/03/2012 3:37 PM. Reason: Added head casting number
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 5 | Thanks, I guess all the searching I did wasn't for nothing, but are all the internal parts the same as the later 235's for ordering parts, is the block the same, the water pump the only thing "old"? I bought a chrome valve cover and side cover, will they fit if I can find the tapped holes, or drill and tap mine, or is the head gasket area differant. Is this a desireable engine or should I just find a newer 235 or 261 Sorry for all the questions, but I've never had an engine older than a 58-62-3764476 casting Thanks again | | | | | Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 | The '53 powerglide engine is a great engine, however it is something of an oddball. It was the first 235 engine with high pressure lubrication, and insert bearings, and hydraulic lifters. The cam is unique to that engine, (maybe also early '54?) it is a forged cam, has the smaller bearing journals like the earlier engines, but has the hydraulic lifter grind. The oil pump may also be different. As far as I know, all the parts are available except maybe the cam. That being said, there should be no problem in getting your cam reground or getting a new cam ground to spec from a blank. The side cover should fit if it is for a 235, and I would think you could drill and tap the holes for the valve cover, but I never looked at doing that. Alternatively you could get a different head. I think it is a cool and unique engine, and I would not hesitate to use it. I have run mine for almost 40 years and two rebuilds. this link may be of interest to you: 1953 engine codes Kurt
Last edited by Kurt_51carryall; 05/03/2012 6:39 PM. Reason: added engine code link
| | | | | Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 5 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Aug 2009 Posts: 5 | I guess I'll tear it down and check everything, as I don't know the history. in case someone else is working on this year engine, here is some pertanant info-I did locate the captains bars, I thought I had read that they were 261 id's, and I located the block castings, they are just above the oil pan flange, quite a bit lower than the older 235's, and covered with years of grease. Also the date code was behind the starter, had to take the starter off to see it, H253 means built Feb.1953 I take it. I'm a little concerned about hydraulic lifters, that technology was pretty new back then Thanks again for the help | | | | | Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 | Yeah, the captains bars were also used on the 261 engine. I have had more than one person accuse me of having a 261 LOL. The same lifters were used for all the hydraulic lifter 235 engines, I think, but not dead nuts certain about that. Pre68dave will know for sure, and you might want to speak to him about how to setup your lifters. Mine have worked very well except for one that I stupidly misassembled.
Be sure to keep the lifters in order if you intend to reuse the cam and lifters.
Kurt | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | Hydraulic lifters were used from 1950 onwards on 235 engines (in the USA). I recall recently seeing at least three styles/design of hydraulic lifers for 235 engines (but, I cannot remember where I saw the photo).
As Kurt posted, Pre68dave will most likely know the correct details.
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 457 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2011 Posts: 457 | Kurt is right on about putting the lifters back on the same cam lobe they were on. These parts are wear mated once broken in, and if you mix them up, they can quickly fail.
1940 Chevy 1/2 ton pickup "KC" A day without sunshine is like, well, ..... dark! | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | All 235 hydraulic lifters are the same physical size. 1950 through early 54 235s had steel cams and the lifters appear to be made of a slightly different material than the later ones for cast cams. From late 1954 to 62 all will interchange although Chev made minor changes through the years. Aftermarket lifters are listed to fit 1950-62.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | The '53 powerglide engine did have the two bolt valve cover. It also has the "captains bars" on the block just above the starter, as does the '54 powerglide.Kurt Kurt, it is true the 53 PG engine had "Captains bars", but a 54 with them would be a 261.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 | Thanks Dave. That's what I originally thought. I ran into a fellow the other day with a 235 with captains bars that he said was a '54. Maybe he in fact had a 261.
Kurt | | | | | Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2011 Posts: 835 | Thanks Dave. That's what I originally thought. I ran into a fellow the other day with a 235 with captains bars that he said was a '54. Maybe he in fact had a 261.
Kurt | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | It seems like every time I make a statement there is an exception, but what I said should hold true for US engines.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,464 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,464 | Dave - you mentioned a few posts back that the steel cams were used through "early '54 235s"..... My handwritten notes (from long forgotten sources) say that the steel cams were used on all standard shift 235's, and that the cast alloy cams were used on all Powerglide cars (including Corvette) for all of '54.
Do I need to change my notes? | | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | I have seen that written also but it does not seem to hold true.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | |
| |