The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (Hotrod Lincoln, Steelonsteel, frogfarmer, plane_fixer, Shaffer's1950, JW51, klhansen, Wayne67vert), 557 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,295
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#82628 09/06/2007 5:50 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
I have a 1964 Chevy 1/2t 4x4 currently it has a 350 gas engine i'm contemplating about switching it to a diesel and i want to know if its even posible or am going to have to change everything. It has a Dana 44 front axle GM Corp. 12 bolt Rear axle (3.73 gears i believe) SM465 Trans, and NP205 T-case if its even posible to bolt it up to what i have is the weight going to be an issue or is there a diesel thats small enough (were weight won't be an issue) but with enough power to pull a decent sized gooseneck?

Nate


Link to my photobucket for pics of my vehicles
http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/OldIronChevy/
#82629 09/06/2007 5:58 PM
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
If you go with a 6.2, 6.5, or 6.6 Duramax, it should be able to be done without too many issues. The real trick is going to be getting the correct bellhousing, as I don't think that the Deisels use the same pattern as the SBC. Trans shouldn't be an issue.
1 question, though. How big of a goosneck are you wanting to tow? To be perfectly honest, if you're wanting to tow a gooseneck, you really should consider at least a 3/4 ton truck, or better yet, a 1 ton w/dual wheels. 1/2 tons don't hold up very well under the streeses of a gooseneck trailer.


Bill Burmeister
#82630 09/06/2007 9:52 PM
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
The 6.2-6.5 fit right in & bolt up to the same bell housing. I believe you use big block engine mounts. They arn,t real powerful though. You could get a turbo charger vkit though.


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
#82631 09/06/2007 10:00 PM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,927
F
'Bolter
'Bolter
F Offline
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 1,927
There is a Stovebolter rdavid that has/had a 64 4X4 panel or burb with a 4-53 Detroit. I corresponded with him when I was researching a diesel conversion in my 50 3600. He is a nice guy and will probably be gald to share some info. I have not seen him on here in awhile. Do a search for him in the members list and send him a PM if interested. I also saw 3 or 4 videos on youtube of a guy with a 64-66 4X4 with a 4-53. Lots of challenges to a diesel repower. There are whole websites and email/discussion boards about that. One dedictated to the 6.2/6.5/Duramax and a popular yahoo group for the Cummins 4BT. A guy over on oldgmctrucks.com put a Cummins 5.9 Dodge Ram in a 49 3800 1-ton. Cool or what? Good luck.


Professional Novice
#82632 09/07/2007 12:01 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
S
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats
S Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,859
I have everything needed to bolt a Cummins B (either the 4B or the 6B) engine to a GM trans.


The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
#82633 09/07/2007 3:51 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
The 6.2 or 6.5 is your easiest and most practical swap.
Go for the later engine with a turbo and power is acceptable, but not spectacular.

Any more engine both power and weight wise and you should be looking for a 3/4 or 1 ton frame and axles.
Many people have done larger diesel swaps on small trucks, but I don't like the idea, I guess if you never load the truck it's one thing, but for a useful truck that's another...

A Cummins 6 cylinder from a Dodge is probably the best swap for power, reliability, parts availability, and bolt on / plug in horsepower potential. A tad heavy for a Dana 44, as Dodge had their own bunch of problems with the Dana 60 under the Cummins.

I like Detroit's, check out my two converted trucks on the link below.

Grigg


1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#82635 10/14/2007 3:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
i appologize for not replying sooner because i couldn't find it, i know a 1/2 ton is not the greatest but its a start i'm going to look for bigger axles and the frame can be strengthened but biggest problems is if i wanted to go to a 3/4ton 1 ton frame is that i'd have to find an original for this truck thats 4x4 or find a suburban frame that is of those tonages because the frame that i have under the truck is a 78 suburban frame
rdavid- what parts would you sugest i look for i would like to keep my setup the way it is just a diesel engine instead of gas and my t-case is married to the trans (the drivetrain is all 78 +/- a few years) just the body is a 64 i'd go for buy the parts that you have but there is a few problems i don't have money available for it right now and sidney b.c. is a ways to drive with a pickup (have to save a ton just for gas) but i would like to know what would you recomend i should change or what is the best to go for
thanks
Nate


Link to my photobucket for pics of my vehicles
http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/OldIronChevy/
#82637 10/14/2007 10:45 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
the thing i never understand is why i never hear much good about the 6.2 and 6.5 diesel because the millitary uses those engines in the Hummers and their 1 1/4 ton pickups in my opinion i don't think the millitary would use something thats junk....
Nate


Link to my photobucket for pics of my vehicles
http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/OldIronChevy/
#82638 10/15/2007 2:17 AM
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 265
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 265
The military must have had problems with the 6.2 because a quick google search will turn up hundreds of 6.2's pulled out of Hummers for sale.

#82639 10/15/2007 2:37 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
I hear the 6.2 had a 50% chance of early death in the military trucks. The early 6.5 was nothing special. Then the last 6.5s with turbo was an acceptable engine, but still nothing special, and defiantly not a heavy duty engine, just satisfactory in a lighter vehicle.

Grigg


1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#82641 10/15/2007 3:02 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
Quote
Originally posted by rdavid:
What is meant by an acceptable engine?
ron
To me it means the engine, and others identical to it, have few if any reoccurring problems, like heads cracking, bad crank shafts, and so on. That they are not to costly to work on. an "acceptable" engine would be reliable, but not perfect.
An engine that is better than acceptable will have an outstanding reputation, last for many many miles, have good power and performance for the weight and size.

I have not run a 6.5 with turbo, but from friends who have or have had them I get the impression that they are simply "acceptable" and nothing special.

"acceptable" to me also means I would run one if given to me in a drive-able vehicle, but I would never spend money to get one.

Grigg


1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#82643 10/15/2007 3:37 AM
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
A 4-53 is more than acceptable.
A 4-53T is not quite outstanding, but close...
Obviously my first choice, and yours too?

While I like them, I realize that not everyone is, or will be, a Detroit Diesel two cycle fan, so..
For a diesel about 4-53T size the 5.9 Cummins has a lot going for it. Great reputation and reliability, great power, and lots of cheap potential for more power.

Grigg


1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
#82644 10/15/2007 3:37 AM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 42
L
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
L Offline
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 42
rdavid, i am gonna take a stab and say that grigg will tell you the 4-53 is an outstanding engine as from reading through alot of his posts it seems as though he has had some good luck with them, one thing to consider about the 6.2 or 6.5 swap that some people might not tell you involves teh injector pump.... i am a general motors employee and i will even tell you that they are garbage. there is a reason when you spend the $ to have the dealer install a new one it has a 10yr 100k warranty.... you'll need it and GM knows it so to retain there cust that have that set up they offer a warranty like that, that you more than likely will need to take advantage of.. just another $.02 from me though
~army truck

#82646 10/15/2007 6:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
O
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 254
i appreciate all the input they way it seems i may be ending up going with the 6.2 as stated they are everywhere and i'm sure i could snatch up a few of them from a millitary surplus store/yard i would like to know a few specs. on the engine if anybody knows 1.what kind of power do they have and if needed can more be made easily? 2.what type of gears did most trucks have that had these engines? 3.what type of fuel econmy is to be expected? 4.finally if i were to get one from a salvage yard what other parts would i want to take off the donor truck? also is it posible to keep the stock fuel tank?
Nate


Link to my photobucket for pics of my vehicles
http://s238.photobucket.com/albums/ff17/OldIronChevy/

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.062s Queries: 13 (0.058s) Memory: 0.6567 MB (Peak: 0.7589 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 20:06:50 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS