BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
7 members (DennisM, Otto Skorzeny, greenie-reddy, IHPWR, GMCJammer51, Hotrod Lincoln, 1 invisible),
568
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,781 Posts1,039,297 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 24 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 24 | Will a tranny from a 1970 GMC 3/4 ton 2wd 4spd fit the bellhousing hole in my 61 Chevy with a 235?I understand that at some point the OD of the bearing cover on GM manual trannys increased. I need something with a PTO opening. | | | | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 | The short answer is no. In 1968 they went from the SM420 to the SM435. There are two differences the OD on the bearing retainer is 5+ inches, and it also sits higher. The bellhousing can be opened up or I believe the bearing retainer can be turned down.
Larry
I don't own a vehicle that isn't old enough to drink. | | | | Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 24 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 24 | Thanks I have a lot of miles on my 4 spd and am looking for an affordable option that still allows me to use my PTO.Is it possible to swap retainers?I've heard of opening up the hole in the bellhousing as well.I live in a remote location and don't have access to a machine shop. | | | | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 | I haven't heard of anyone swapping retainers. The only other option I can think of is swapping the bell housing, but that won't work for you because of the hydraulic clutch. The only other thing would be to get another bell housing for the 61 and have it opened up. Then you could do a fit check before you tear it apart.. You might also look into rebuilding the 420. I've read it's not difficult, but that could lead to problems too if you haven't done one. There's a great group of stovebolters here to help, and I can check the Inliners International roster to see if there is anybody in your part of Canada.
Larry
I don't own a vehicle that isn't old enough to drink. | | | | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 235 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 235 | I put a late 70's early 80's three speed in my 61 and had to replace the bearing retainer to a smaller one. Not sure if you can do that to a 4 spd.
| | | | Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Jul 2001 Posts: 3,887 | the bearing retainer size has to do with the bellhousing hole, the larger opening and retainer are truck, the smaller retainer fits the car bellhouse .... it would be that way with a 4 speed, you'd need to have the truck bellhousing to fit it, a car one would have too small an opening
Bill | | | | Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 787 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 787 | why not just rebearing your sm420. they are pretty tough old trans. a sm365 doesn't give you that much more. it has a little higher ratio in first, but is still quite low ron | | | | Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 235 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2004 Posts: 235 | My original bell housing was cut with a torch by the former owner to replace the original 3 speed to make room for a 4speed I bought a replacment bell housing on E-bay and not sure what it came out of. | | | | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 1,002 | I believe all the bell housings car or truck up to 1967 had the same size hole for the bearing retainer. I'm going by having swapped 3spd to SM420, and passenger car 4spd. In 1968 GM went to the SM465 and 435 in their trucks which have the larger bearing retainer. The 68-72 truck bell housing should be able to replace those in earlier trucks with the exception of the hyd clutch and 235 engine. If I'm wrong I'm sure I'll hear about it.8-)
Larry
I don't own a vehicle that isn't old enough to drink. | | | | Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 787 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 787 | I believe all the bell housings car or truck up to 1967 had the same size hole for the bearing retainer. I'm going by having swapped 3spd to SM420, and passenger car 4spd. In 1968 GM went to the SM465 and 435 in their trucks which have the larger bearing retainer. The 68-72 truck bell housing should be able to replace those in earlier trucks with the exception of the hyd clutch and 235 engine. If I'm wrong I'm sure I'll hear about it.8-)
Larry 283 eng also used the pass side clutch opening ron | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | I dont believe there is a 235 bell houseing with the larger hole for the SM465. If it was a V-8 you could use the later bell houseing. I think rebuilding your trans will be the best route.
Last edited by Wrenchbender Ret.; 09/11/2011 4:22 PM. Reason: Put 435 instead of 465
They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 787 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 787 | yes for a 283 you could use the later bellhousing.. but then you would lose the use of the hydraulic clutch setup. ron | | | | Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 159 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 159 | Oleschool, Find a brigeport or a similiar device,center the hole and open it up to fit the larger retainer.I converted several years ago with no issues.Being from Canada the local farmer probobly has the equipment you need dont waste your money on another bellhousing .
In the works 2006 GEN III 6.0 /4L80E/ 205 New process,A/C and power brakes .
| | |
| |