Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,016 Posts1,055,337 Members48,419 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 | I have a totally rebuilt 1953 full pressure 235 in my ’41, it is stock except 0.020” over on the bores and a 848 head.
Today is the third or forth time I have played with the ignition timing. I removed the lower flywheel cover and painted a nice white stripe right over the “ball”. I have made adjustments to make the timing 2 degrees BTDC; 5 degrees BTDC; 10 degrees BTDC; and 12 degrees BTDC. After each adjustment I shut off and restarted the truck and took it for a short drive including a “foot to the floor” ½ mile run in high gear starting at about 30 MPH. I found no discernable difference in starting or performance and could hear no pinging across all of the adjustments.
During the engine’s reassembly I checked the’41 flywheel before I installed it and found by measuring and a simple calculation that the “ball” is 5 degrees of rotation ahead of the U/C mark. Before I installed the cylinder head I found when the U/C mark is aligned with the timing window pointer the # 1 piston is exactly at the top of its stroke. All of this makes me sure the timing marks are correct.
Shouldn’t I expect some noticeable difference in a full 10 degrees change in timing?? Where are you guys running the timing on your 235’s??
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | With today's fuel about 10 degrees seems to work best on most of the 216s and 235s I time.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,544 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,544 | I found working on our '40 this summer that these engines will run with lots of advance. I learned that to much advance would give a slight surge at a steady speed. It also would cause it to run a bit warm when driving at highway speeds in hot weather. I backed the timing off a bit and it performs great and runs much cooler at highway speeds. No matter how much I advanced the timing I didn't have an issue with hot cranking or pinging. | | | | | Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 | Thanks guys. I think I'll stay with 10 degrees for now. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,154 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 1,154 | YEP....we went through a whole bunch of scenarios even with our Langdons HEI we found that just timing to the BB was best and it was at this point our vacuum was almost at its highest. Learning both timing methods was of great value to us. The factory specs are for timing at the BB. Never tried to time after the BB (ATDC) yet another scenario I guess. Steve | | | | | Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,048 | Dave:
It is interesting that you have referred to “today’s fuels” in your note. I’m wondering what the difference is between gasoline of the 40’s & 50’s and the gasoline of today.
I’m thinking that it is essentially the octane rating that should affect the timing and spark knock (pre-ignition). Was the octane rating of the older gasoline’s lower or higher than today’s? I remember something about the older fuels being measured by one method and, I think, modern gasoline octane rating is an average of the old method and a newer method all if which rates today’s gasoline at a higher octane that it would have been rated in the 40’s.
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,337 | Hey Kip, I am not up on the changes, I am only going by my experience.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,746 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,746 | By the late 1950's/early 1960's, even "regular fuel" engines had compression ratios in the 9's, so gasoline needed lots of anti-knock compounds. Some of the super-premium gas was well over 100 octane, and I've seen stock compression ratios of 10.5:1 or more on some of the factory hotrods from the early 60's. Other than buying 100 octane aviation gas or a few "off-road only" brands of racing gas, I can't imagine running those engines without some sort of fuel additive, even on unleaded "premium". Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
| |