BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
8 members (GMCJammer51, IHPWR, DJHobbit'46Chevy, Danielbolt, Dragsix, RBs36, 2 invisible),
556
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,780 Posts1,039,296 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 | From what gathered here, the front axle width (WMS to WMS) of an AD 1.5 ton is approximately 69.5". Well, I just measured mine (three-times to be exact) and it's 66".
I'm, confused.
BTW, does anyone happen to know what the front width of a 60-67 3/4 or 1-ton(A-arm frame) is WMS to WMS? | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 | I'm not sure where you got the 69.5" from, but I supposed it is published somewhere. So why are you curious? Are your tires rubbing something or what? Are you sure you have a 1 1/2 ton. How many lug bolts do you have? | | | | Joined: Nov 1995 Posts: 5,470 Bond Villain | Bond Villain Joined: Nov 1995 Posts: 5,470 | I can go measure my AD 1.5-ton front axle for you but you'll have to refresh my memory on what WMS stands for (no coffee yet this morning ...)
John
~ John "We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are" 1948 International Farmall Super A1949 Chevrolet 3804In the Legacy Gallery | In the Gallery Forum1973 IH 1310 Dump2001 International/AmTran RE3000 "Skoolie"2014 Ford E-350 4x4 (Quigley) | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | WMS stands for Wheel Mounting Surface, the flat part on the hub where the wheel sits. When putting together this tech tip http://www.stovebolt.com/techtips/bigbolts/p30swap/I measured a 48 2 ton front axle at 69-70" I'll double check this evening and should be able to get a more accurate measurement too. Perhaps I measured, remembered, or wrote it down wrong, what measurements do other folks get? Grigg | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | After careful measurement and averaging to remove inaccuracies of camber and toe-in the 48 two ton front axle I have is 69-15/16" from WMS to WMS.
Grigg | | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 | Weird. I just measured mine again more exactly. The width is 65 9/16" front of flange and 65 3/4" rear of flange. Maybe I have some sort of "freak". | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | You did say 1.5 ton, and I said 2 ton. I know there are differences in the two, was not aware of width differences but it's not surprising.
Who else can measure some AD 1.5 and 2 ton axles? Measuring technique is also important. It ia a good idea to clamp or have someone hold a straight edge on the wheel mounting surface (wheels removed) while you do the same on the other side and pull a tape measure parallel to the ground between the two. Also measure in front and behind so you can average and remove toe-in from the equation.
Grigg | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | From memory, the 1-ton and standard 1-1/2 ton use the same axle with different hubs. The heavier 1-1/2 and 2-ton use a different heavier axle. The differences in width may be a slight differences in hubs.
Does your truck have Huck or Bendix front brakes? I don't know that brake type changes width, but it could.
I have a '51 4400 and a '52 6400 parked out back, but currently am in no condition to measure the widths. Anyone in the Seattle area want to come to Bainbridge Island and measure them? I'll supply the trucks and tape and might even watch.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 | unholy1, I'm not sure what you are measuring when you refer to the front and back of the flange. If it is the wheel mounting flange. you may have a bent tie rod or someone screwed it in all the way. I have a 53 GMC 2 ton, but it has wheels on it. | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | ..I have a 53 GMC 2 ton, but it has wheels on it. Same here, when I get a chance I'll pull them and measure it too. Grigg | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | Why is it significant, unholy? I can only echo crenwelge's question, "is it rubbing or something"? | | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 | Why is it significant, unholy? I can only echo crenwelge's question, "is it rubbing or something"? I'm swapping the front axle for later model 1-ton stuff for disc brakes and more wheel options. | | | | Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2003 Posts: 2,733 | It would seem that if the widest axles the responders have listed will fit the chassis then you will have to stay close to that dimension. Keep in mind that the turning angle of the new axle may not be the same as the original and that could lead to some fitment/clearance issues. What newer trucks are you considering?
And thanks for clearing things up for us, it was little confusing. | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | The later model 1 ton (and slightly larger) GM I-beam axles are still to wide to fit as they are.
Don't know about independent fronts, but expect they are also to wide.
Did you check out the axle swap stuff in the tech tip I linked to in an earlier post?
Hard to offer advice not knowing what you're after in the end, but don't think there is an easy way to swap disc brakes on one of these trucks. As far as bolt patterns, 8 lug and smaller wheels seems a step in the wrong direction if you want a 1.5 ton truck?
Grigg | | | | Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 New Guy | New Guy Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 16 | 99.9% of the time the truck will be a cruiser. I may, occasionally, tow my 7k car trailer with it. | | | | Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 4,903 | For a cruiser and an occasional 7k trailer pull, I would think 3/4 ton would be a more logical starting point than a 1 1/2 ton. The cabs are the same. | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 35 Apprentice | Apprentice Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 35 | I logged on tonight to ask a similar question. We are taking frame to be sandblasted this week and would like to put newer disk brake type axle under front. What is best way to go? We were going to mount body on 1988 3/4 ton but were told this wasnt so simple. How do I get a safer more modern setup under the current body and/or frame? | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | ...would like to put newer disk brake type axle under front... How do I get a safer more modern setup under the current body and/or frame? One method is to swap the front axle (and rear axle too if you like) http://www.stovebolt.com/techtips/bigbolts/p30swap/Read through that, it's doable, but not simple. Grigg | | | | Joined: May 2010 Posts: 5 New Guy | New Guy Joined: May 2010 Posts: 5 | unholy1
I once swapped a 1976 front a-arm axle one ton and put it on my 1967 C-30 and it did end up about 7inch wider. Does that help any?...................Flat67 | | |
| |