The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (2-Ton, cmayna, 1955 1 Series, tclederman), 85 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,134
Posts1,056,402
Members48,441
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#674489 08/31/2010 8:43 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
G
New Guy
New Guy
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
I hope I don't ruffle anybody's feather, but can anybody tell me the difference between a 216 vs a 228? Which is better?

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,644
P
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
P Offline
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,644
My vote would go to the 228 I have a 53 GMC 3/4 ton with one and am running a 216 that I just rebuilt in My 52-3100 the 228 has insert bearings and had a better carb on it also is full pressure oil sys. verses the splash oil on the 216, also has a few more HP.than the 216.But the 216 will run forever if taken care of and You don't try and run it at 55+ MPH.

Pete

Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 7,438
The 216 is an automobile engine designed to propel a vehicle down the road. The 228 is a truck engine designed to haul a load down the road.


"It's just a phase. He'll grow out of it." Mama, 1964

1956 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
1953 Chevy 6100 "The Yard dog"
1954 GMC Suburban Now with a new proud owner.
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,066
Bolter
Bolter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,066
so 12 inches makes that much difference..


Redryder pix
My Hotrod
A veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of "up to and including my life."
I am fighting cancer and I am winning the fight | Pain is part of life; misery is an option.

joker #674523 08/31/2010 11:17 PM
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
G
New Guy
New Guy
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks for the replies. I have the Stovebolt Virus and there is no cure. I got permission from "the boss", my lovely wife if I would find one reasonable to buy.

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269

Yes, the GMC guys call it "long engine envy" - the GMC 228/248/270/302 engines are longer and, for the most part, better than 216/235/235/261 engines. The only feature in the Chevrolet sixes that was superior to GMC engines was the full-flow oil-filtration system used in 58-63 261 Chevrolet (USA) truck engines (the GMC sixes never had full-flow filtration).

Supposedly, the GMC engines also had a higher nickel content in the head/block, which made them more durable than the Chevrolet sixes?

Last edited by tclederman; 08/31/2010 11:59 PM. Reason: corrected a few words - Thanks, John
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
"The only feature in the Chevrolet sixes that was superior to GMC engines was the full-flow oil -lubrication system used in 58-63 261 Chevrolet (USA) truck engines (the GMC sixes never had full-flow lubrication)."

Tim
Did you mean "Full flow oil filtration"?

Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,269

Yes, that is exactly what I meant. I am on and off the phone with doctors and lawyers and was distracted.

Thanks, John

I will make the correction above.

Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
Tim just messing with you!
For those that may be unaware...Full flow oil filtration is standard on todays vehicles, but not so much 50 years ago. It refers to how the oil is filtered...Ok you got that much from the name.

Early gmc engines and chevy engines used a "bypass" oil filter setup. "Dirty oil" was taken to a filter cartridge. "Clean oil" came out of the filter cartridge and was dumped back with the dirty oil in the oil pan.

The Full flow oil meathod pumps the 'dirty oil out of the block and into a filter. Clean oil is then returned to the block's oil galley where it gets pumped to the vital engine components. This meathod is considered superior because you are sending filtered oil to the main and rod bearings.

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 158
F
knuckle head
knuckle head
F Offline
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 158
The GMC engine is certainly better than the 216-235 low oil pressure engines,but I'm not so sure if they are better than the 54 and up 235-261 Chevy.I could never find any hard facts stating a GMC lasted longer than a Chevy in normal duty truck use.It's all subjective stories from days long past.
For vintage hi performance use the GMC has more potential than the Chevy.In fact,back in the day,a built GMC could run away from a hot Flattie Ford V-8 and be more durable at the same time.
In the real world of today with a vintage truck living a live of luxury compared to the beating they used to get,there's no real difference between a Chevy or GMC other than a GMC truck should have a GMC engine.

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
G
New Guy
New Guy
G Offline
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 13
Thanks Guys for the education!


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0