Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,075 Posts1,056,279 Members48,441 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: May 2010 Posts: 85 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: May 2010 Posts: 85 | ok...1952...single stage paint or two stage paint??
Do something! Even if it's wrong!
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,644 | That's entirely up to you.
I'm not going for a show truck so I'm using a single stage. If you want a concours quality finish you will want to use a two-stage paint system. | | | | | Joined: May 2010 Posts: 85 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: May 2010 Posts: 85 | i agree....i was curious what they did in 1952? i dont think two stage was available yet???
Do something! Even if it's wrong!
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | Two stage paints (base coat - clear coat) were not used in 1952. The exterior paints were a synthetic (alkyd) enamel (Dupont Dulux) but repaints and repairs were often done in Dupont Duco (a quick drying and durable lacquer).
A modern acrylic enamel (with or without a hardener) or a single-stage two-part urethane are modern equivalents.
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,644 | Good information Tim.
Danhami, of those two, the single-stage urethane is easier to apply and much more durable. No comparison. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | I agree, Woody.
I do not know anything about concours quality old trucks (or concours-only show or competitions, but, would BC/CC rate higher at a concours event if the original paint was not BC/CC?
| | | | | Joined: May 2010 Posts: 85 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: May 2010 Posts: 85 | all this is true. i've shot 2 stage and single stage...the difference in the outcome is significant. Just a little thought in case anyone was curious, Most aircraft are shot in single stage for 2 reasons-time and durability. most vehicles are shot base/clear-appearance. the disappointing thing here is that due to the "tree huggers," most paints now are water based...and the result in my opinion is just not as good as the old paints...now lacquer.... lacquer is where its at!...With all this said, i live in California...land of the idiots. (sorry if i offended anyone here...but things were good back in the day when we had more options...)
Do something! Even if it's wrong!
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,644 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,644 | I agree, Woody. I do not know anything about concours quality old trucks (or concours-only show or competitions, but, would BC/CC rate higher at a concours event if the original paint was not BC/CC? My bad... poor choice of words. Should have said "show stopping" or something else more appropriate to describe the highest possible quality of gloss and finish. | | |
| |