| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
8 members (Peggy M, Donf, Otto Skorzeny, Wickedbass, Hawkman, NJC, GRNHydra, hdgeren),
83
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,023 Posts1,055,370 Members48,420 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20 | Has anyone attempted a frame swap here? I have a 1952 GMC. I love the truck but would love to have 4-wheel drive plus p/steering and disc brakes. I have heard the wheelbase is different, but I have a wooden bed, so the back end could land wherever it does and still look alright. Any comments?? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 15 Apprentice | | Apprentice Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 15 | Try the Tech Tips section, lots of info here and it will help get you started. For more details about your truck try http://chevy.oldcarmanualproject.com/chevyresto/index.htmGood luck
You cannot measure a man by where he sits in comfort and security, but where he stands in times of adversity and danger.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | What model GMC do you have?
Pickups came in three different wheelbases and bigger trucks came in quite a few more. The wheel base is different than what?
Why do you want four-wheel-drive and how do you plan to use the truck?
I'm not challenging your desire to go that route, but rather believing better understanding your objectives would make it easier to comment on your options.
I see three approaches to what you want to do. Mount four-wheel-drive stuff on your existing frame, mount your cab on an S-10 or similar small truck frame, or mount your cab on a full-size truck frame.
Each approach has advantages and disadvantages and knowing which is best for you really depends on what you are trying to accomplish.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20 | I have a 1952 GMC with the 6 foot bed. I would probably drive the truck year around, thus the disc brakes, p/steering and 4 wheel drive. Thanks for your interest. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Year-round street driver? Not a lifted and fully articulated rock crawler type?
If it were me I'd put it on an S-10 4x4 frame and run a 454 with a TH400 and NP205. But I'd probably build it based on a '54 GMC instead of a '52.
I say that because the S-10 frame and the '54 GMC cab are in my shop right now. The drivetrain parts are in a parts truck parked beside my shop.
While the project is on hold today for other reasons, this is one of my active projects.
Mine will probably not be a daily driver, but instead will be the alternate I use when the weather isn't real friendly. My current daily is low enough (Corvette) that when the roads are wet my windshield is hard to keep clear. This truck will be used if I'm tried of straining to see and on those rare days we see snow around here.
It will also be used to pull a trailer when I don't need a bigger truck to do the job. My primary trailer puller is too big and long some of the time and while this one would not make sense with a heavy load or long distance, it would certainly move the trailer around my yard with more ease than my bigger truck.
From the little you said about how you'll use the truck I see yours as primarily street driven with four-wheel-drive for inclement weather, not for wild off-roading. If off-roading was a big part of your plans I'd suggest putting straight axle type axles under it and using the original frame.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats | | Grumpy old guy playing with trucks, cars, and boats Joined: Aug 2007 Posts: 1,859 | for a frame swap, I would go Dakota vs S-10 simply because the track width of the Dakota is closer than the S-10. However the ZR2 has a wider track width and an 8" rear.
However like Steve mentioned, a good alternative would be a straight axle under the original frame (just like Napco did)
The problems we face today can not be addressed at the same level of intelligence we were at when we created them - Albert Einstein Or with the same level of $ - Me
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 20 | Lotsa food for thought...Thanks 'bolters | | |
| |
| |