Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (tclederman, Woodcmiami, Hotrod Lincoln, Otto Skorzeny, 2-Ton, bobfake, 1 invisible),
41
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,091 Posts1,056,034 Members48,433 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#58133 03/22/2006 5:04 PM | Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 | I am purchasing a 54 1/2 ton that has the Hydramatic tranny Would like to keep it as original as possiable but would like to be able to drive on the highway at a decent speed. Thought I would see if anyone could give some good ideas on how to best accomplish this. Thanks from a old new guy | | |
#58134 03/22/2006 6:28 PM | Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 10 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 10 | If you want to keep the engine and tranny original, try a 3:55 ring and pinion gear set from Patrick's. However, you need to get a rear end from a 47 through 53 AD to accomplish this as the 3:90 rear end in the 54s won't accept the new gears. | | |
#58135 03/22/2006 10:37 PM | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | chevllssc,
What is a decent speed? I am able to run smoothly and safely between 55-65 mph in my '54 trucks (including a Hydra-Matic). Been doing this for many years. It's nice to have good tires and a tight front suspension, but that would still be the case with a lower ratio (higher speed) rear end.
Tim | | |
#58136 03/22/2006 11:16 PM | Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 | Thanks Tim your the person I was hopeing to hear from. Been checking out your site very nice. Once I get the pick-up back (I owned it one time before)long story. I will probably need a lot of advice from you.
Thanks (Cliff) chevllssc | | |
#58137 03/23/2006 12:16 AM | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | chevllssc, Greg_H is in Enid, OK. He knows a lot about the '54 Hydra-Matic Chevrolets. I'll start working on mine when the garage warms up - next month, I hope. I drove it from NJ to my garage in Dec and it's been hibernating. Most likely we'll be regularly comparing notes/experiences. Good luck, Tim | | |
#58138 03/23/2006 4:36 PM | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 1,966 | Is it really worth the cost, work, trouble to change from 3.90 to 3.55? That's a 9% reduction in engine RPM for any given MPH. Will that really make an appreciable difference in fuel economy, etc.?
Professional Novice
| | |
#58139 03/23/2006 4:58 PM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 297 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 297 | chevll - I recently switched the rear in my 54 from the original 3.90 to 3.55. (3 speed tran) i have not been able to drive it very far becasue i have some brake issues to deal with but Frank50 makes a good point. you will not see a tremendous amount of difference in anything by going from 3.9 to 3.55. i was fortunate that i was able to purchase a rear that already had everything rebuilt in it with the 3.55 pinion and for a very reasonable price. basically all i had to do was slide one out and slide one in. it all depends on what you want to do with your truck. if you are out there cruising and in fast traffic all the time then, in my opinion, you are much better off ditching the torque tube and spending your money on the blazer or s10 set ups that everyone is using. If you want a little driver to mess around town in and for short trips in no hurry then the torque tube is just fine.
54 3100 w/62 235 "Yosemite Sam" Born a Jay Hawk, raised an Okie and resurrected in Texas!http://community.webshots.com/user/djed50
| | |
#58140 03/23/2006 6:38 PM | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,269 | I do not know about putting a Patrick's 3.55 kit into a '54 rear end, but an earlier rear end would not work with a '54 Hydra-Matic transmission, without shortening the drive-shaft and torque-tube.
Maybe the '54 Hydra-Matic torque-tube and driveshaft could be used on the earlier 1/2 ton rear end?
I agree with djed50 - just drive it. This combination of rear end (4-speed automatic) and torque-tube rearend is uncommon - a good conversation piece and not a bad ride. | | |
#58141 03/24/2006 11:21 PM | Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 3 | Ok, you guys have convinced me if I do buy it back which I probably will I will leave it as is. I want to keep it as original as possible but I have gotten old, fat and lazy and want some comforts also. Thanks for all the good information. | | |
| |