BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,282 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | |
#56235 02/08/2006 8:31 PM | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 582 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 582 | Well, I read all the posts on the oil diverter plug for changing the engine to full flow filter oiling. It seems that there were a bunch of opinions as to whether or not the plug should be flush with the block or driven in approximately 1/2 inch to divert the oil from the pump, out the normally plugged NPT hole, to the filter and then back in the aft NPT hole where the pressure gauge sometimes sits. My 261 was never set up for the filter and the plug is flush with the block. Is the consensus now that the plug needs to be driven back for full oil flow? Thanks! | | |
#56236 02/08/2006 9:04 PM | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 343 Member | Member Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 343 | I remember talking about this years ago, but refresh my memory as to where this plug is located.
Thanks, Jim
1954 GMC 1/2-ton Longbed 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport
| | |
#56237 02/08/2006 11:25 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 | I remember seeing a factory number for this, was 0.62/0.68 inch or there abouts. Most difficult chore is getting the thing to move at all. I've heard all kinds of methods from heating the area to drilling the plug out and threading the hole for a plug. If the motor is out of the vehicle I'd take it to a good machine shop. | | |
#56238 02/09/2006 3:51 AM | Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 199 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Feb 2005 Posts: 199 | I just went through this subject with the machine shop that did some work for me during the rebuild of my 261.I also changed to full flow oil filter.
While he had my block he made the change for me by moving the diverter in 5/8".
The guy seemed very astute on the 261 and did a great job for me.He once raced these engines and was talking way over my head about performance and modifications.
Hobert
"The Lord is my shepherd"
| | |
#56239 02/09/2006 9:03 AM | Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 399 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 399 | How about the canadian Poniac 261. Do they have full flow or just a by-pass?
How to tell the difference?
Thanks, Frank | | |
#56240 02/09/2006 12:58 PM | Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 582 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Nov 2000 Posts: 582 | Apache, have the same thing with my machinist Paul Hogge. He knows Tom Langdon (Tom recommended him to me) and also built race engines with sixes and eights. Used to do the 1/4 mile events. Extremely knowledgable fellow. My engine is the last one he's going to do as he's retiring at the age of 70+. Will be having him do the plug while the block is open and sitting on his table. | | |
#56241 02/09/2006 2:05 PM | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 Bubba - Curmudgeon | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 | Stovebold,
If you have the Canadian Pontiac engine with hydraulic lifters, it supposedly had the by-pass oil filter for all years.
"Jim Carter: During the 1955-62 Canadian Pontiac application the lifters were the hydraulic type, the cam gear was fiber not aluminum, and it did not have the full flow oil filter. These Canadian made 261's did not add the full flow filter in 1958 as in the U.S."
The 261 engine was used in some Canadian trucks but I do not know (1) if it was used between 1958-1962, and (2) if it was available between '58-'62, if it had full-flow oil filtration (as the USA 261 had). Also, all truck 261s had mechanical/solid lifters and an aluminum cam gear.
Tim | | |
#56242 02/09/2006 2:43 PM | Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 399 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2004 Posts: 399 | Thanks Tim.
Well the casting # 3837012 makes it a 55-57.
Can“t say if it came from a truck or car, but it has the drilled lifter gallery (came without lifters and cam gear when I bought it), had a tag of a canadien Pontiac Garage/Shop on the side and the main caps say "made in Canada". So that`s why I belive it`s of a canadian Pontiac car.
I got a solid Bulldog cam and solid lifters for it. I think after all the Information I got here it`s safe to bolt on a bypass filter.
Frank
Frank | | |
#56243 02/09/2006 5:09 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 2,074 | I'm sure this oil plug only applies to the later 261s which also had the larger 1/2" oil lines. Earlier 261s had only the bypass filter as did the 235s. There may be more info in Tech tips re. modifying your 235/261 for full flow filtering. | | |
#56244 02/10/2006 10:47 AM | Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 71 Member | Member Joined: Jul 2005 Posts: 71 | I haven't had any experience with 261's but if it is of any help, Inliners.org has a detailed article on modifying the early Chev/GMC engines to full flow filtering. Go to tech-tips,then full-flow conversion. | | |
#56245 02/10/2006 1:35 PM | Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 Extreme Gabster | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2000 Posts: 1,586 | I've built several later 261'a with the plug.On one engine,the dowel was in the out position,supposedly to bypass the full flow filter.But on close inspection,you can see the dowel plug blocked the internal oil bypass,so the oil flow would have to go through the filter,then to the engine. I would say to check out the situation first hand before attempting to drive in the plug.These engines have been out of production for nearly 50 years,all kinds of stuff may been in the past.No one over the phone or internet can see what ya got. | | |
| |