The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (55shaker, FAST55, WICruiser, Rusted Nut, MickeyP), 179 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,078
Posts1,056,051
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 171
G
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 171
Tonight I did a compression test on my 54 235. This was the first compression test on this engine, and my first compression test ever. I've read a lot about this, so I understand what the readings mean, but what I want to know is are my findings acceptable for a 235, or should I be saving for an engine rebuild in the near future?

The dry test showed:
#1 = 115, #2 = 115, #3 = 125, #4 = 119. #5 = 95, and #6 = 115.

A wet test showed #5 = 132, so at least for #5 I can say that the ring is worn to some degree. I didn't do a wet test on the rest since they all had relatively even readings, but their low readings (should be 130 or better) could be rings or valves or both.

The book says they should all be 130 or better and +/- 5-10 pounds for "satisfactory engine performance". The engine seems to have worn evenly across the board, with #5 being the only exception.

The truck seems to run pretty well right now. Maybe it could run more smoothly (it rumbles a bit maybe), but at least now I can attribute the slight rumble to #5. Or can I?

So all this leads to my main question: how bad are my readings. Is 115 (15 down from the perscribed 130) ok, so-so, bad, or really bad? Am I missing gobs of power and fuel economy, or am I not that bad off? As I said, the truck runs pretty well, and I realize I might not be getting optimal gas mileage/power, but I don't want to rebuild the engine right now.

If you had an engine like this, what would you do? My truck is being rebuilt to a safe and mechanically sound state -- I'm not doing a full restoration. So I have tolerance for it not being perfect, but I don't want to overlook a big issue. And I don't have the experience with this 235 to know how big an issue I have on my hands. My instinct tells me just to forget about it and drive the truck...

Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 388
Greg,

Do you know how many miles are on the engine since its last overhaul? As you have surmised, the rings on #5 may be somewhat tired, and the rest of the cylinders are slightly low. I recall seeing 130 to 140 psig on good 235s, and I get 230 psig on my 261, with 11:1 compression ratio. However, unless you want to rebuild the engine for other reasons, there is no immediate need for an overhaul.

By the way, was the throttle plate blocked full open when the engine was cranked for the compression test? If the throttle is closed, the manifold pressure will drop and the peak compressed pressure will be low. This will probably have not much effect on the difference between #5 and the rest of the cylinders.

Good the see another St. Louisian active with a stovebolt.

Hoyt

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,708
A
'Bolter
'Bolter
A Offline
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,708
Greg,

I agree with Hoyt. I would leave it alone and eventually #5 will probably lead the pack, and if nothing else, start to use a little oil or smoke a tad. The truck is old..the engine is old.. it has to be worn. Those numbers are good for an old engine, they are to be expected. Drive it and enjoy it but I wouldn't rebuild it right now, just on those compression numbers.

That's my unprofessional two cents worth!

Stuart

Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 171
G
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 171
Thanks for the adivice.

I did have the throttle wide open (using the throttle knob in the cab, which I know is working), so my numbers are as good as they are going to get.

I don't know when/if the engine has ever been overhauled. It has about 48K original miles on it -- or at least that is what the odometer says. Judging from the manifold bolts, I'm not sure it has ever been rebuilt. Those bolts look like they haven't moved since the truck was built.

Well thanks for the info guys. I'll just keep driving it until it clearly needs help -- like big smoke clouds or something!


Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,792
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,792
The next logical step is a cylinder leakage check, where compressed air is introduced into the cylinder through the spark plug hole and you listen for leakage at the intake, exhaust, and crankcase filler hole. Both vakves need to be closed, and the piston at or near top dead center when the air goes in. Put the transmission in 3rd. gear and lock the parking brake or chock the wheels to keep the crankshaft from turning. If, as you suspect, rings are the problem, you'll be able to hear air escaping into the crankcase by listening at the oil filler cap. Unless there's a big leak, I'd suggest driving it, and keep an eye out for blue smoke in the exhaust and/or excessive oil consumption.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 461
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 461
I would do a wet compression test on all the cylinders so you have a reference for the future. I agree with the others that your situation at this point is acceptable, although the 95 PSI cylinder is lower than desirable. I would also suggest setting the valve clearance, to take out that potential variable for compression. It doesn't seem that your low cylinder would have that trouble, but set the valves anyway: Intake, .008"; Exhaust, .015". These settings are recommended for severe service operation, but were typically used for all service. Standard service settings: Intake, .006; Exhaust, .013".

When you have all the spark plugs removed for a compression check, it is not necessary to open the throttle; there won't be any manifold vacuum during cranking when the spark plugs are all removed, so there won't be any loss of pressure because of manifold vacuum (reduced manifold pressure).

Also, take note of the spark plug color and appearance. Dark brown to black indicates rich fuel mixture, oil consumption, or the spark plug heat range is too cold. Light tan to off-white insulator is a good condition. Pure, clean white insulator and a bluish color and shine on the center electrode indicate hot plugs, for what ever reason they are hot- heat range too high, fuel mixture too lean are possibilities.

Harvester


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0