The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (55shaker, Ponchogl, Woodcmiami, NorCal52Suburban, Paul Mullen, J Lucas, DennisM, JW51), 569 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,776
Posts1,039,271
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#443159 08/19/2008 4:28 AM
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
I'm thinking about running a 700r4 in my '54 GMC 1-ton to get the overdrive. If I do, I'll run a 454 in front of it.

Here's the problem and why I'm thinking I can get away with it. I'm going to use this truck to pull my 18 foot car trailer. I believe GM did not put this transmission behind the big block and while it is used in 3/4-ton pickups (I have one) even there they do not recommend pulling a trailer in overdrive.

While I enjoy power, I don't generally hot rod while pulling a loaded trailer. I'm thinking I can enjoy the OD when unloaded, making the truck much more usuable, and then just drive gentle in direct when its got a loaded trailer behind it. Even pulling hard up a hill the application of power is smooth and would not be like drag racing or that kind of harsh load.

The one other detail that makes me think I can get away with this is that I own numerous vehicles, and don't drive most of them very far each year. This one may only go a few thousand miles a year and may not go even go a total of 20,000 miles once I finish it.

The alternative is to run a TH 400 or TH 475, both of which I currently own. I could run a Cadillac 500 instead of the 454, but don't want to run that in front of the 700r4. Until I started thinking about adding overdrive I was planning to go with the Cadillac.

Do you think a 700r4 will live 20,000 miles behind a mild big block in a 4000 pound truck pulling an 8000 pound load? Or is this just crazy talk and I should go back to the Cadillac and Turbo 400?


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
No what you should do if you are serious about this combination is not use the 700R4 (which you would have to build the [censored] out of to make last up the first hill you came to) and buy a 4L80E and a controller (many companys make plug and play controllers to adapt this transmission to carbureted vehicles). This transmission WILL handle what you plan to throw at it and it will last as well.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Joe your experience matches my expectations. Buy a new rebuilt 700r4 and maintain it right and I'd expect it to work. And I have pulled a trailer using a small block and 700r4 and done okay. It will hit 190,000 in the next few days.

Running an overdrive automatic behind the Cadillac would require an adapter plate and I don't want the trouble or expense. The 454 needs to be moved and the Cadillac doesn't...

38 I don't want to pay for a 4L80e. Just the control box by itself will cost me what I expect to pay for a 700r4. The transmission will be thousands more. I have priced this option.

I'm building this truck on the cheap and while I won't skimp on safety and control aspects, this seems like a place where a realistic look at my needs means I can get by with a cheaper option.

Which part of the greater Seattle area are you in? I'm on Bainbridge Island.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by TooMany2count
Steve, GM used the 700R4 & later OD trans in the 1/2ton & up trucks from the early/mid 80's & up.
I had a 84 burb w/a SBC & a 700R4 in it & drove it untill it started to slipp at 250,000. Out of thoughs miles at least 150,000 was pulling a fully loaded 16-20ft trailer. As I told my friends, I didn't use my truck I abused it horriblely. I'd start it up, rev'd the mtr a couple of time & back out of the driveway & while still rolling backwards I'd shift into drive & hammer the pedal & away I'd go & it still lasted 250,000miles. Now I did change the fuild 2-3times a year because of the mileage & alway dump a bottle of (so-called snake oil) Lucus Trans fuild in it.
Yes I know its not a BBC but I do have a friend who has a 98 Chevy 1ton w/a 454 & OD trans in it & he used it as a courier truck & pulled a 20ft trailer to haul supplies to highway construction sites for 5yrs w/o any problems.
In my owners manual they adviced NOT to pull a trailer in OD but I did it all the time BUT ONLY on a flat haighway & NOT on any hills. If you're worried about anything I'd add a trans cooler like they did on the later & heavier trucks, maybe add an extra spin-on filter & just be sure to change the fuild a couple of times a year and you shouldn't have any problems.
As for running the Caddy mtr w/a OD trans, why not it's no different then what Chevy was doing other then it being a Cadillac...joe

a trans cooler on any vehicle that is being used to tow a heavy load or on a regular basis MUST have a trans cooler. Heat is what kills transmissions.
the fluid chemically breaks down and loses its critical friction and lubrication propertys which is when the trans starts to slip.
running full synthetic transmission fluid is also recommended (dextron Six, redline ATF)

Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
http://www.transmissioncenter.org/compushift_4l60e_4l80e.htm

Yes the controller is expencive. a new transmission is more. how many times are you going to replace your transmission because it cannot hold the load your putting on it?
I was a builder for quite some time and the transmission i saw the most of was the 700r4/4l60e.
You CAN build a 700 that will hold what you want to throw at it if your REALLY easy on it for a while for about $2000. just make sure if you do go with a 700 that you adjust the kickdown cable right as this is the most common cause of premature failure.

a 700r4 is limited to hold about 450hp. they can be built to hold more but at a heavy cost and they are designed for drag racing, not constant towing. they are not ment to be used as frequently as it sounds like you want to use yours.

if the guy building your transmissions toomany3count and they only lasted 50k then he is not a builder, he is a backyard mechanic.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
The motor I'm planning to run is a stock late 80's TBI 454. It probably does not make more than 300 horse. It would produce a fair amount of torque.

I have a '91 K2500 with a 350 and a 700r4 which I have used to pull my trailer. I'm not impressed by the performance but it has almost 190,000 miles on it, so I am impressed at the longevity.

The project truck will probably do most my trailer pulling once its done, but would rarely leave the yard, so its not like it will see a lot of use. I just can't see spending $3,000-$4,000 on the transmission when I won't have that much in the rest of the truck all together...


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
well i have to say too many 2 count is a smart man actually changing the trans fluid BEFORE they burn up their tranny. I assume the fluid will remain in the transmission for 100k miles all the way up to the life of the transmission with the exception of what leaks and is replaced by topping off.

I had one customer a week tops to have the fluid flushed or simply a filter change even who was not an existing customer who had bought that transmission from us.
as in... until they burned the thing up they forgot all about it or were just uneducated in the basic maintenance needs of automatics.

Yes changing the fluid on a regular schedule increases trans life greatly and SHOULD be done anyways.

I am a fan of the full synthetics because they withstand higher temperatures and are rated to be good for 100k miles. I've noticed better shifts as well from the improved friction modifiers.

if you are just running dextron III then LUBEGUARD is a great product. it is an additive. the black bottle is the one to run in GM's I believe but its been a few years sense I've used any fluids that i'd want to add it to.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
I've done some more calculations and increasingly I'm not convinced I can save enough fuel to justify spending money on any overdrive transmission, when I already own the TH 400 and TH 475.

I may give up this whole line of thinking and just go with what I've got.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Does my brain hurt? Yes. And my back and my feet too. When my fingers start hurting I'll stop posting...

I think I just scored another Cadillac 500 with TH400. That may be the end of this story right there. I can drive this one into the shop and move it into the truck.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 499
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 499
>The motor I'm planning to run is a stock late 80's TBI 454.<

I believe the 4L80e has been around since about '93. Get the 454, 4L80e, wiring and computor from the same truck. The price difference between a '93 and say an '89 is not going to be that great.
I hope you didn't expect to do this for pennies. You've got to deal with the extra weight, bigger brakes and steering $$$$$$$$$$$$ A couple of extra bucks for the drive train requirements you listed, is the least of your worries.


'67 GMC 3/4 292 4spd
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
Richard I've not spelled it out here, but I already own all the motors I'm discussing here. The TBI 454 with Turbo 400 I've proposed using are in a wrecked '89 K3500 sitting behind my shop. The q-jet 454 with TH 475 are in an old P30 motorhome setting in my back lot, and the Cadillac 500 with Turbo 400 are sitting in the back corner of my shop. And actually there is a second Cadillac 500 with Turbo 400 setting in my yard, and though today it belongs to my son, within two weeks I think it will be mine.

This post was just about the the overdrive transmission issues. If you search on my name you'll find I've been dialoging on numerous other aspects of this truck project.

I would point out though that extra weight isn't really an issue. Any of the engine transmission combinations I've considered will not weigh enough more than the stock GMC 248 and Hydra-Matic to make a huge difference. And the truck I'm starting with has a GVWR of 8800 pounds which is only 100 pounds less than the '89 K3500.

While pennies isn't realistic I do intend to do this on the cheap. My intent is to keep the total budget under what a 4l80e plus controller would take new.


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
T
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
T Offline
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 71
Originally Posted by Richard
>The motor I'm planning to run is a stock late 80's TBI 454.<

I believe the 4L80e has been around since about '93. Get the 454, 4L80e, wiring and computor from the same truck. The price difference between a '93 and say an '89 is not going to be that great.
I hope you didn't expect to do this for pennies. You've got to deal with the extra weight, bigger brakes and steering $$$$$$$$$$$$ A couple of extra bucks for the drive train requirements you listed, is the least of your worries.

I agree to a point. He has the motor. I say go buy the Transmission, Computer, Throttle body off a 4L80 truck and use one of his motors. If you have a little negotiating skills you could probably walk away from that one with all the parts you need if you pull them yourself for cheap.


Moderated by  Fibonachu, KCMongo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.065s Queries: 14 (0.061s) Memory: 0.6486 MB (Peak: 0.7493 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 14:02:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS