The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
2 members (3B, Cosmo), 149 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,080
Posts1,055,951
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
I pulled out my front wheel cylinders of my 54 Chevy 4500, and noticed they are only a wimpy 7/8 bore diameter.

I am wondering if they are the incorrect size. I wish to send them off to have them sleeved in stainless, but not if they are incorrect for my year. I am sure the previous owner replaced them at one time.

Sources I have been using call for a 1 inch bore wheel cylinder

I am wondering if more than one size wheel cylinder will fit? I would think that the bigger the better.

According to the Jim Carters online catalog, 55 and up trucks used the 7/8 bore. 1953-1954 should use a 1 inch bore wheel cylinder.

Yet I see smaller trucks using larger bores, from 1 inch or larger. Even the 54 1 ton trucks this year are 1 1/8 inch bore.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,961
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,961
According to my book a 1954 GMC 300-400 series which are 1 1/2 to 2 1/2 ton use a 7/8 bore and I would imagine Chev would be the same. If your truck has duel wheels, it will have larger cylinders in the rear and relatively small cylinders in front to keep the front wheels from locking up upon hard braking. The GMC number for the correct wheel cylinder for a 54 is 5454387

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
O
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
O Offline
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
I see, the brakes are small on purpose, since the rears are large. I guess I am thinking that, typically, most of the braking should take place in the front. Obviously, this is not the case with these vehicles. Anyway, thanks for the good information.

George

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 829
5
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 829
Originally Posted by oldbus
most of the braking should take place in the front
That is why the rear is larger - to balance out the front brakes. Have you ridden a cycle and used the front only?
You actually need to use the rear more than the front to keep from going over the handlebars.


David Colter
pics * 1954 wrecker * [color:#009900]1948 Chevy 1-Ton[/color]
No act of kindness - no matter how small - is ever wasted ~~ Aesop
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 21
1
Apprentice
Apprentice
1 Offline
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 21
I had the same cylinders on the front of my '57 2 1/2 ton and thought they were kinda tiny, too. I looked for new ones, but they were listed as unavailable in the NAPA catalog and I didn't have any luck with any of the other vendors, either. I had almost resigned myself to getting mine sleeved, but I decided to take another look through the catalog again by spec instead of application. I found two part numbers (right and left) for a later truck that had the same bore and had NAPA order them and see what they looked like. I was pleasantly surprised. They were identical to the originals in every way except that instead of the hoses entering perpendicular to the bore like the originals (so the same cylinder fits both sides), the hoses enter at about a 45* angle. That small difference made no problems at all. They were about half the price as getting the old ones sleeved. I can get you the part numbers if you like. Also, I found that the front hoses are obsolete as well. The rear one is not and is the same part number down through at least a 1 ton. I used rear hoses for the front and it worked out really nice. They have the correct ends for both the wheel cylinders and the steel lines. All I had to do was make a small braket to attach the end to the frame. I can take a pic of my setup if you like. Other than making the bracket and drilling/tapping one hole in either side of the frame, it all just bolted together. Just a couple alternatives to the parts that aren't available anymore!


Moderated by  69Cuda, Super55 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0