BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | Forums66 Topics126,776 Posts1,039,259 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | Does any one sell a gas tank sending unit (for a 55-59 TF) with 3/8 inch fuel line, instead of 5/16 inch fuel line? The fuel tank is located in the stock location, behind the seat.
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 | Im curious, why would you need a 3/8" line? | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | My concern is having enough fuel capacity to feed my 383. Right now I have an 8an line connected to the pick up tube, essentially creating a giant fuel log before the fuel pump. But just like the flow of air though an exhaust system, the flow is restricted to the smallest section, which is the 5/16 fuel pickup in the tank.
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 | gofsbuick, I have a copy of Lightning Reference which is a fluid power designers bible. I tried to look up the flow stats on a tube 5/16" in diameter. I was going to amaze you with my knowledge but I couldn't figure out what I was reading...duh! I will fall back on my gut feeling. I picture a huge 4 barrel carburetor, working WOT as you blast down the road. I cannot see all the jets in that carburetor passing more fuel through their tiny orifices than that 5/16" pickup tube can supply. Add this to the fact that there is a pretty big bowl full of fuel, not to mention the contents of all the plumbing on the discharge side of the pump. It seems to my untrained brain that your current pickup tube would be completely adequate, but I have been real wrong before. Stuart
Last edited by atomarc; 05/23/2008 3:32 AM.
| | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | I agree w/ Stuart, if any engine you'll be using on the street uses more fuel than a good pump can pull out of a stock pickup, you better have a real bundle of dough to fill up every couple miles .... I know a guy with a built 427 in a 55 with a stock tank and pickup tube and stock line right to the pump, never heard of him having starving problems, and he keeps that 750cfm edelbrock howling sometimes .... in the real world, your flow is only restricted by how much the pump can move Bill | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | You know, I've already been told by a member on this board that me and Chevrolet (published) really do not know anything about tuning. I said nothing until now. The guy with the 427 in the 55 removed that engine out of what? Probably a Corvette and that Corvette (which is considerably lighter than a 55 TF truck) came equipped with 3/8 fuel line. Typical HP rating for 5/16 fuel line is approximately 250hp and 3/8 for around 375 HP. Most of the V8 engines we install into our trucks are from late 60s to mid 70s vintage, when Chevrolet increased fuel line size to 3/8. I really don't want to disrespect your opinion and knowledge, but I would really prefer to pull fuel though a 3/8 pickup, as I'm feeding a decently stout SBC engine though a 830cfm Holley and a VictorJr intake. So could you please, if you know of any vendor that can accomodate my needs, before I have a fuel tank company disassemble a stock sender and reassemble it with 3/8 line. Thank you
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | well then, the simple answer is no, there is no different TF sender available ... if the Vette had a 3/8 line, and the 55 has a 5/16, then from Eds experience, the 3/8 wasn't really necessary, but hey! we all do our rigs the way we want  Bill | | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 549 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 549 | well then, the simple answer is no just couldn't end it there, huh? | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | well then, the simple answer is no just couldn't end it there, huh? Yes, thank you.
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 Cruising in the Passing Lane | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Feb 2002 Posts: 12,029 | just couldn't end it there, huh? nope, just hadta see if you were still taggin along behind  Bill | | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 | Just to throw a little more fuel on the fire, so to speak, I had to give my dad a call. Im more into original stuff and hes an old hotrodder at heart. He used to run a 427 with a 6-71 blower and two 4 barrel carbs. If he remembers right he only used 1/4" lines, and he said it had no problems with being starved for fuel. But having a blower also increases the volumetric effieciency of the fuel. While my belief is that 5/16" is fine, you certainly cant hurt anything by going with a larger size. gofstbuick, do you have any pics of your truck? We like that sort of thing!  | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | This is the first tim I've tried uploading a link to picture. I think I got it to work right. Right now the truck is a pellet storage device plus the new suspension pieces. Hopefully I can work on removing the front end this summer and maybe have the engine in by the end of the year. Thanks for asking about pictures. http://good-times.webshots.com/album/563571974HGueyP
Last edited by gofstbuick; 05/24/2008 7:49 AM.
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2006 Posts: 1,867 | Cool! I like that color of blue. My '53 had a flatbed on it when I bought it and it was the best mobile tool bench ever! I sold the flatbed and boy do I miss the extra space. | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | I just received my modified sending unit today. So I added the picture of the sending unit with the 3/8 inch fuel pick up tube to the webshot album above. Cost me $95 for peace of mind, but I'm very happy. It fits in the tank better than when it had the 5/16 line attached. Now all I need is a 3/8 screen from a 55 chevy wagon, nomad or 60-mid 70 corvette and I will be done
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 641 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 641 | ever see how much gas will come out of a 1/4 inch line backed up up by a fule pump anymore is overkill | | | | Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 769 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Feb 2000 Posts: 769 | I am going to get up on the soap box again.
If a 5/16 line would do the job for the high horse power engines, the Detroit bean counters would never have allowed 3/8 lines and fuel pumps to be installed on the high performance cars. Saving a dime on each unit, when you are talking thousands of units, is more important than adding bells and whistles.
Use the 3/8 lines and fuel pump, and sleep good. | | | | Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: May 2006 Posts: 77 | I am going to get up on the soap box again.
If a 5/16 line would do the job for the high horse power engines, the Detroit bean counters would never have allowed 3/8 lines and fuel pumps to be installed on the high performance cars. Saving a dime on each unit, when you are talking thousands of units, is more important than adding bells and whistles.
Use the 3/8 lines and fuel pump, and sleep good. Thank you for saying so. For those of you that want to continue with your stories of feeding fuel though 1/4 or 5/16 or whatever, go ahead, but I really DON'T CARE and I've said so above. It's my engine, my truck and my money. I'm done!!!!!!!
Admin for Turbobuick.com 87 GN, and new toy: 1955 Chevy 3200 pickup, soon to have: 383, Cola crank, Childs/Albert 6 inch rods, Brownfield heads, 10:1 KB hypers, CompCam 284 Extreme Energy, Tilton Plate transmission realignment and built Turbo400.
| | |
| |