The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Guitplayer, joetravjr, Paul Mullen, TooMany2count, jmoore, qdub), 566 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,780
Posts1,039,294
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,317
J
Former Workshop Owner
Former Workshop Owner
J Offline
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,317
I am planning to switch my torque tube differential and tranny for an open driveline. This will be for a '41 half ton that will also get a newer transmission hopefully a T-5. Would this be a good choice?

As described by the seller

Dana 35C rear axle from '91 Jeep Commanche pickup. Will fit all years of Commanche pickup (MJ) '84-'92 & Cherokee (XJ) from '84-'01. The "C" means it's a C-clip axle. C-clip axles were used in all '91 through '01 model rear axles. Has 3.08:1 gearing. Had new brake drums & shoes installed with about 500 miles on them before pinion bearing failed. No other component damage. All internal parts are fine. Axle Shafts alone are worth more than what I'm asking. Was going to use the axle shafts for wife's '94 Grand Cherokee but they will not work. The housing will need to have new shock mounts welded back on.

Would this be a good candidate, are the gears too high for a manual tranny? I am going to measure my drum spacing to compare widths, as I might check it out this weekend.

Or is this unit not a good choice, it sounds like I can get it cheap.

John

Last edited by J Lucas; 01/19/2008 5:39 AM.

~ J Lucas
1941 Chevy 1/2-Ton
1942 Chevy 1.5-Ton SWB
In the Gallery
1959 Chevy Apache 32 Fleetside
My Flicker Photos!
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
B
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
B Offline
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,897
A dana 35 is pretty light duty. A dana 44 or dana 60 would be stronger. The gears are a bit high for an overdrive as 3.08 gears are already almost considered an overdrive.

I think you would be happier with a stronger rear. The one mentioned would probably live pretty well behind a 235, but the gears aren't that desireable with an overdrive... unless the OD ratio is about a 0.85:1. For all practical purposes 3.55 to 4.11 gears would perform the best. the 3.55 being on the economy side, and the 4.11 being better towing or hill climbing gears. A 4.11 ratio is effectively a 3.0 ratio with a standard .73 overdrive.

Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
O
Cruising in the Passing Lane
Cruising in the Passing Lane
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,152
They would almost need to pay you before it would be a good deal. The cost of repairs could easily be more than the cost of a better unit in servable condition.

On the other hand the gears could work okay if you have enough power. I have 3.08 gears under my '55 GMC Suburban and am pretty happy with them. I have 3.07 gears in a Corvette with an overdrive and it performs great. I wouldn't use either to pull a trailer though.

The GMC has a 270 and the 'vette is a 'vette...


1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more...
It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble...
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
G
.
.
G Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,877
My first impression is no,
the Dana 35 is not very desirable
C clip axles are no good in my opinion (disc brakes would help some with that)
The 3.08 is more than likely geared to fast with an OD transmission.
Don't yet know width and bolt pattern?

If I had a 1/2 ton with 4 speed, the bolt pattern and width of the axle were right on, and it was less than $100 and less than an hour away, then I would give it a try, and probably be happy with it.
Sounds like that's not the case for you.

Grigg


1951 GMC 250 in the Project Journals
1948 Chevrolet 6400 - Detroit Diesel 4-53T - Roadranger 10 speed overdrive - 4 wheel disc brakes
1952 Chevrolet 3800 pickup
---All pictures---
"First, get a clear notion of what you desire to accomplish, and then in all probability you will succeed in doing it..." -Henry Maudslay-
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,276
H
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
H Offline
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,276
I would say the best choice would be to use a F@rd 9" they can be found in many widths and are easily modified for any application.


The difference between men and boys is the price of their toys.
Grant from Roy, Washington
1956 6100 Chevy Dump Truck in the Gallery
1964 GMC Drump Truck in the Gallery
user
http://s1301.photobucket.com/user/56Taskforce/slideshow/
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 86
J
JC Offline
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 86
The 70s and 80s Wagoneer axles are pretty tough & narrow. You can keep the 6 bolt lug pattern also.


JC in KC
"The future will be better tomorrow." Dan Quayle
1965 Chevy C10 Long Fleetside
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 8,351
Originally Posted by JC
The 70s and 80s Wagoneer axles are pretty tough & narrow. You can keep the 6 bolt lug pattern also.
If one were to go that route, might as well use a 12 bolt from a '73-'76 Blazer and keep all Chevy! And get a stronger axle, too.


Bill Burmeister

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.035s Queries: 14 (0.032s) Memory: 0.6219 MB (Peak: 0.6944 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 19:13:32 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS