Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,124 Posts1,056,334 Members48,439 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | Hi,
I needs some help with this. I did a search, but didn't come up with what I was looking for. I want to change my tranny and rear end in my 41 3/4 ton. The nonsynchro and super low gearing is a bit of a pain. Engine is a stock rebuilt 216.
Thanks,
Jeff | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | Help us out a little more. What do you want to accomplish with this change? Do you plan to stay with the original motor?
You're dealing with stuff that is earlier than where I feel confident I can offer solutions. What I can tell you is that the bellhousing on a '41 1/2-ton, and I presume also a '41 3/4-ton, is different that the '48 and later stuff.
The transmission bolt pattern is different, and the bellhousing has a support that has something to do with the clutch pedal. But if you are changing motors too, that kind of information can become irrelevant.
What are you trying to accomplish?
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | I'm keeping the 216 engine because it was just rebuilt. I really want a transmission with synchro that's more modern, like a T-5. The transmission is the big thing. Because the truck is only going to be driven on short runs and around town, I don't mind the 4.57 gearing. I'm trying to keep the truck as original as possible, but I need a better transmission.
Jeff | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 553 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 553 | Several of us have put a T-5 trans into an Art Deco truck. The heart of the conversion is a transmission adapter plate. You won't be sorry if you do it. Look it up on the Tech Tips icon at the top of this page. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,897 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2004 Posts: 1,897 | The 3 speeds they used for the art decos are at least partially syncroed. You would not be able to downshift from 2 to 1.
Is your 3/4 ton an open drive train, or torque tube setup. If it is open you would have more choices like a t-5, without having to change your rear end too. Look up Steppinwood and cavebull's art deco transmission swap pictures. You will get a good idea for what is involved for a t-5 swap. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | I'm not sure, but I think mine's a torque tube. Can the T-5 swap still be done if it is?
Jeff | | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 Cruising in the Passing Lane | | Cruising in the Passing Lane Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 5,152 | If your truck has a torque tube its going to be more work than it may be worth to adapt something like a T-5. I'm sure it could be done, but it might require a smart fabricator and machinist.
Patrick's used to offer a kit that put a Saginaw 4-speed in a torque tube AD. While its not OD, it is fully synchomesh and more pleasant to drive. I have no idea if that kit would work on a '41 3/4-ton.
1955 1st GMC Suburban | 1954 GMC 250 trailer puller project | 1954 GMC 250 Hydra-Matic | 1954 Chevy 3100 . 1947 Chevy COE | and more... It's true. I really don't do anything but browse the Internet looking for trouble... | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | OK, then a different differential is needed to do the T-5 job right. What would be a good choice? I would like to have 3.90 gear ratio minimum.
Jeff | | | | | Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 874 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2004 Posts: 874 | Isn't your truck open drive line past the carrier bearing? Advance Design 3/4 tons have open rears, but are closed drive line from the trans to the carrier bearing. I think Art Decos are the same configuration, but I am not positive. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 Member | | Member Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 62 | I'm really new at this. Please explain what an open driveline is. My driveline is a 2 piece type.
Jeff | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | An open drive shaft has the part that turns exposed. A closed drive shaft has a stationary tube over it. Yours is closed on the front part & open in the rear section. That will make it ok to put in a different trans without changing the rear end. A drive shaft shop can make up a drive shaft to fit the conversion. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,557 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 2,557 | Jeff,i am posting a picture of an 1951 torque tube rearend "enclosed driveline".This is a one piece driveline for a 3100 series truck.Instead of an open driveshaft,the tube has a propellor shaft inside it and connects to the transmission with a u-joint.This rear end is for an AD truck . I hope this helps. 1951 torque tube rearend 1951 3100 Chevrolet1951 Chevrolet Suburban CarryallImage"A house is built with boards and beams. A home is built with love and dreams." "Look deep before you leap !!!" / "Everything is Everything" "If I say a mouse can pull a house, hitch him up"
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 354 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2003 Posts: 354 | I have a 41 3/4 ton. I just pulled a T-5 at a U-Pull-It last week. Behind the transmission is a short torque tube with the end mounted in a carrier bearing. From the carrier bearing to the rear-end is an open driveshaft. I'm planning on installing the T-5 and having a driveshaft made up to replace the short torque tube and leave the open driveshaft in place (assuming I can get the u-joint between shafts matched up)
Harold Wilson 41 Chevy 3/4 Ton
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 707 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jul 2006 Posts: 707 | Baldbaron; Read this, from a thread entitled," "51 3800 216 gear ratios" in "Big Bolts". I had the same problem.
And... here it is. Picked her up a couple hours ago, and I've driven 20 or 30 miles in a bunch of different conditions. To review, what I've done is change the differential gear ratio from a far-too-short 5.14 to 4.10. Nothing else substantial except for whatever bearings were exposed in the process (all of 'em), and the front wheel bearings to boot. Here are my early impressions: First gear is now useable for something other than rock climbing. I stopped on a 15% grade. 1st gear was (of course) an easy start almost without any throttle. At about 10mph I shifted to 2nd smoothly and easily without having raced the engine, and 2nd pulled away nicely. Ditto 3rd, and I levelled off at around 30 mph in the middle of third at a moderate throttle setting. Keep in mind that at 15%, the grade I ran was almost 3 times as steep as the steepest interstate. I could easily have gone fast enough to pick up 4th, but I'd have been exceeding the speed limit. Probably couldn't have held fourth anyway. So at the top I shifted up and idled very nicely at around 35mph at the very bottom of 4th. Then I took to a freeway. Evelyn followed me with her certified speedometer. It's German, you know. Therefore, of course, superior. Right. First I tried for my fastest comfortably sustainable cruise: 58 or 59 mph, she said. I could do that all day. But I also tried a "fuel miser" cruise, which turned out to be exactly 50mph. At that speed I could actually downshift, dump the throttle and scream up to 55 just like that! I didn't do that - no reason to - but I could have. I have the distinct feeling that the next time Epic is asked to haul a load that would void a new truck's warranty, she'll do it without a hitch, exactly like this, but at a slightly higher rate of fuel consumption.
There is no problem here, I'm telling you. This is exactly what I was looking for. A truck that will still lift your house, but can now eat great distances without straining. I think I'll stay with this for a while. 2nd is still a flat ground starting gear. I don't need an overdrive, and probably wouldn't unless I really started to sock on the featherweight highway miles. Even then, this would do nicely, I think.
-Mark
p.s., My transmission is a SM420, synchro in 2-3-4. 1951 3800 Be the change you want to see. -hotshoe
| | |
| |