Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
2 members (qside, 78buckshot),
76
guests, and
1
robot. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,072 Posts1,055,907 Members48,429 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,682 | Years ago I saw a Caddy with weird looking valve covers, and on the side it said V4 6 8.
The owner explained it was some (at the time) new fangled method of increasing fuel economy.. the engine would run as a V4 for around town driving, as a V6 when you needed a little more power, and as a V8 when you really put your foot into it.
Most people i've talked to about it said the engine wasn't used but in just a few model years, and the idea was eventually scrapped due to numerous reliability issues.
Flash forward to present day.. on a commercial for the new Chevy Impala, I saw that a simular idea was being used in the SS models, now called "DOD" or Displacement On Demand technology.
From the chevy website: A 303-hp small block V8 is standard in SS and features Displacement on Demand (DOD) technology that uses eight cylinders when you want more power, four cylinders when you need better mileage — delivering an EPA estimated, petrol-pinching 28 MPG highway.
What do you think?
an idea is only stupid if you think about it rationally.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 738 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 738 | fumblin - i am not sure what i think about it but the nee "hemi" in the chrysler cars has this same technology which, so they claim, gives the new charger almost 30mpg on the highway. it is not a new technology, it was scrapped on the old caddies cause the idea was ahead of the technology of the day and too many problems occured. i think that technology is probably good enough now to make this idea work. i like the idea in some ways but i am not sure that i want my car deciding for me when it is going to do. same reason that i am not big on throttle by wire, or active stability controllers, maybe i am just old fashioned, who knows. neat technology though.
"Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their ingenuity." - George S. Patton My Machine | | | | | Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2002 Posts: 9,115 | I have driven the Chrysler 300C hemi on a long trip and it really works well. I couldn't detect any change in the engine operation and it has more than enough power for me. In addition,it got better mileage than a Chrysler mini van. However, the car is not something that I would buy, even if I had the means! The styling causes problems with the view down the side and to the rear. It is also a rather large sedan. | | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,777 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,777 | The Caddy engine was used in the 1980 model year only, as I remember, and had a moveable valve rocker arm pivot that disabled the intake on several cylinders as it cut back to 6, then 4 cylinders in operation. It would drop back to 4 cylinders very nicely, but it was reluctant to come back to full power quickly. Cadillac was replacing engines regardless of mileage a couple of years later at no charge, because the perfromance was so lousy. Maybe Chrysler's got it figured out now, but I'm not holding my breath until it happens! Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 543 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Apr 2004 Posts: 543 | I drove a HEMI 300C recently and was quite impressed! The change from 8 to 4 was imperceptible, as was when you hit the gas, the eight came right back and allowed for smooth, speedy passing. My niece has one she uses in her real estate job, putting as much as 300 miles/day on it at times. She has 45K on it now, and says it has been trouble-free.
Pessimist - Sees glass as half-empty. Optimist - Sees glass as half-full. Gov't- Sees glass and takes it from you because you have a glass. Political Correctness: A philosophical belief system bereft of common sense and logic, that supports and rewards ignorance and stupidity.
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jun 2000 Posts: 2,773 | The old Northstar 4-6-8 relied on mechanical drive to cut out the cylinders. Northstar recently went with electronic control called variable valve technology, and now have a good engine. I was reading Car & Driver last night, said that Chevy was going to use the engine in the new Tahoe/Burb they are coming out with.
Fred 52 3600 69 C-10
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 45 Member | | Member Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 45 | Originally posted by Fred T: The old Northstar 4-6-8 relied on mechanical drive to cut out the cylinders. Northstar recently went with electronic control called variable valve technology, and now have a good engine. I was reading Car & Driver last night, said that Chevy was going to use the engine in the new Tahoe/Burb they are coming out with. The 4-6-8 is ABSOLUTELY NOT A NORTHSTAR. The caddy northstar was introduced as an alternative to the 4.9L motor in the '93 model year for most FWD cadillac autos, and it displaced 4.6 liters (289 CI). The 4-6-8, by comparison, was introduced in the '80 model year, and displaced over 300 cubes. Additionally, the first generation of northstars (93-95, prior to OBD-II implimentation) did not have DoD, and the northstar VVT wasn't available until after 2000, and only on the Cadillac mini-suv (at least it was facing the right direction, all previous northstars were transverse mounted) Pontiac developed a car called the "GXTP" which had a northstar under the hood, not sure if it ever went into production but I sort of doubt it. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 343 Member | | Member Joined: Sep 2003 Posts: 343 | I have a 2005 Dodge Magnum R/T with the new 5.7 Multidisplacement HEMI and I love it! Like previously stated you don't really notice the engine dropping back to 4 cylinders when you are cruising down the highway and there is no hesitation when you jump on the gas and the engine goes into 8 cylinder mode. I don't really baby the magnum as I drive it to and from work mostly on highways traveling at 65mph and I have been getting 20-21mpg, they claim you can get up to 25mpg highway, but I have not seen it yet.
1954 GMC 1/2-ton Longbed 1971 Pontiac LeMans Sport
| | |
| |