Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
2 members (Ponchogl, Hush),
67
guests, and
3
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,024 Posts1,055,395 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | |
#18160 09/30/2004 4:39 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | I've been offered a Zenith 9046A carb for my recently rebuilt 261 engine. I have a Carter YF on there now, but it is too small for the engine. So, will I be any better off with the Zenith 9046A? Or, should I continue to look for a Zenith 228? I've heard that the 9046A was a military carb. If so, will my truck run like a tank?  :p | | |
#18161 09/30/2004 1:19 PM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 Carburetion specialist | | Carburetion specialist Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 | The Zenith is a fine carburetor, but this one is a wee bit large for your 261. Bore the 261 125 thousands, and stroke it a quarter of an inch and then this carb would be fairly close. Jon. Good carburetion is fuelish hot airThe most expensive carburetor is the wrong one you attempt to modify. If you truly believe "one size fits all," try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!The Carburetor Shop | | |
#18162 10/01/2004 1:37 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | Yikes!
I'm only bored .030 over, so I guess that this carb isn't a great idea.
I really appreciate the input and advice that this board gives.
Thanks! | | |
#18163 10/01/2004 1:25 PM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 Carburetion specialist | | Carburetion specialist Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 | 53Therapy - look for a Zenith from a G.M.C. 270 CID. Same size externally as the 9046, but smaller internally.
The internal size is ALWAYS more important than the external size (one can always make an adapter for the external size), as the internal size is what controls the airflow.
Jon. Good carburetion is fuelish hot airThe most expensive carburetor is the wrong one you attempt to modify. If you truly believe "one size fits all," try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!The Carburetor Shop | | |
#18164 10/10/2004 3:02 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | OK, so now I may have found another zenith carb #11658. But it doesn't have a vacuum advance port on the throttle plate body. :confused:
Can I drill and tap a port, or is there some other method? :confused:
Thanks, Steve | | |
#18165 10/10/2004 11:20 PM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 Carburetion specialist | | Carburetion specialist Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 | You can drill and tap the port. Use your other throttle body for a guide as to positioning the hole. Do not yield to the urge to interchange the throttle bodies.
Jon. Good carburetion is fuelish hot airThe most expensive carburetor is the wrong one you attempt to modify. If you truly believe "one size fits all," try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!The Carburetor Shop | | |
#18166 10/16/2004 5:00 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | My carb arrived today!  On the throttle body there is a boss where it appears that the vacuum port should be, and I'll drill a 1/4" hole just deep enough to tap, then drill a smaller hole inside that one going into the actual passage. But, when comparing the original Rochester B and the Carter YF, there is a difference in where the hole(s) come out on the inside. On the Rochester, there are two very small holes beneath the butterfly valve, but on the Carter, there is one small hole above the butterfly. So which is correct? should the vacuum be below or above the throttle butterfly? Does the size of the hole(s) matter? I really don't want to mess this up, it took me a while to find this carb. Thanks, Steve | | |
#18167 10/16/2004 1:47 PM | Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 Carburetion specialist | | Carburetion specialist Joined: Nov 2002 Posts: 2,763 | The hole above the throttle plate is for "ported" vacuum; the hole below the throttle plate is for "manifold" vacuum.
Which you use depends on which your distributor wants (time for an ignition guy to jump onto this thread).
Jon. Good carburetion is fuelish hot airThe most expensive carburetor is the wrong one you attempt to modify. If you truly believe "one size fits all," try walking a mile in your spouse's shoes!The Carburetor Shop | | |
#18168 10/17/2004 6:01 AM | Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 Extreme Gabster | | Extreme Gabster Joined: Oct 2001 Posts: 3,458 | Your 261 will want ported vacuum for the distributor. The hole should be above the throttle plate when at idle but will be below it as soon as the throttle opens a bit.
Paint & Body Shop moderator A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic. | | |
#18169 10/17/2004 6:20 AM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,747 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,747 | Start small, about 3/32" or smaller, as you can always enlarge the hole if you don't get enough vacuum. It's tough to drill it smaller! The "ported" vacuum should come in just above idle, so drill the hole to be exposed as the throttle plate opens a little. Vacuum on the distributor at idle makes it difficult to slow the engine down enough for a slow, smooth idle. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
#18170 10/18/2004 1:03 AM | Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 94 | Thanks for all the replies. I really appreciate everyone's willingness to share their knowledge.
It sounds like this could be a rather delicate operation...getting that tiny hole placed just barely above a wafer-thin piece of brass. If I screw it up, there's always JB Weld, right?!?! :p
I'm wondering why this GMC carb didn't have the vacuum advance port in the first place. Is there some other way of advancing/retarding the spark besides the vacuum advance? Just curious...
Thanks again, Steve | | |
#18171 10/18/2004 1:26 AM | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,747 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 29,747 | Some constant-speed engines, like for power generators, water pumps, etc., had only "centrigugal" advance, controlled only by engine speed. Vacuum advance is a fuel-economy thing, allowing a few degrees more advance at light load, part throttle. The advance goes away quickly when the throttle is opened to climb a hill, pass, etc. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | |
| |