The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Brrrr
place holder
Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (TexasFarmTruck, TUTS 59, Phak1, JW51, TexasJim50), 72 guests, and 4 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,271
Posts1,058,417
Members48,485
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1615334 11/13/2026 7:41 PM
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 52
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 52
I'm working on rebuilding a 270 GMC and the seal surface on the crank is pretty pitted and has been already been ground undersize a little. I'm considering modifying the block to accept a rubber rear main seal.

I found a Garlock split seal that is a size that I can counterbore the back of the block to accept the seal. (see pics)

Boring out the block should be fairly easy. I can set the block on my mill sitting on the top deck and be able to bore it using a right angel head on the machine. The installation instructions call for a seal retainer to be installed which I can make and retain with some small flat head screws. With the one-piece design of the split seal it will require me to put the seal on the crank before setting it in the block but I think that will work ok.

Basically I was wanting to bounce the idea off folks in this forum to get your reaction to the idea. Do you consider it a workable idea or would you say no way?
Attachments
seal.jpg (93.66 KB, 19 downloads)
install.jpg (118.73 KB, 19 downloads)
Block.jpg (235.11 KB, 19 downloads)

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,272
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,272
That might work. Do the seal ends need to be glued together? Also it looks like your seal retainer would need to be a 2 piece affair, secured to the block and the main cap separately. That flywheel flange on the crank sure makes this harder than putting a full circle seal on a Chevy. I did that on my 216 when I put the 235 crank in it.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 52
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Nov 2025
Posts: 52
Originally Posted by klhansen
That might work. Do the seal ends need to be glued together? Also it looks like your seal retainer would need to be a 2 piece affair, secured to the block and the main cap separately. That flywheel flange on the crank sure makes this harder than putting a full circle seal on a Chevy. I did that on my 216 when I put the 235 crank in it.

Yes, the retainer will have to be two piece. The instruction only say to orient the split in the seal towards the top but no mention of sealing the ends.
It would definitely be much nicer if it didn't have the flywheel flange.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0