The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (JW51, TUTS 59, homer52), 554 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,776
Posts1,039,274
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1558704 09/23/2024 7:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
I'm going to rebuild my 302 head. Machine shop said it maged ok, but it most likely will need guides and valves. It's the D shaped head. My question is will Chevy v-8 valves work, or a good place to buy GMC valves. I believe my other head on my 270 has v-8 valves and I believe its an H head.
Jay D.

Last edited by Gdads51; 09/24/2024 1:48 AM. Reason: fixed typo in title/added detail to title
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,392
Gearhead, Stovebolt Tech and Parts Tracker, Mod for Swap Meet and GTT
Gearhead, Stovebolt Tech and Parts Tracker, Mod for Swap Meet and GTT
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 4,392
Jay D - What year 302 do you have? Just asking to see if it helps find some answers to your questions. smile


~ Dan
1951 Chevy 3 window 3100
Follow this story in the DITY Gallery
"My Grandpa Carl's Truck and How it Became Mine"
1966 Chevelle (Wife's Hot Rod) | 2013 Chevy Silverado (Current daily driver)
US Army MSG Retired (1977-1998) | Com Fac Maint Lead Tech Retired (1998-2021)
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,096
E
Crusing in the Passing Lane
Crusing in the Passing Lane
E Offline
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5,096
Dimensions? There are 4 GMC heads, which one do you have?

Ed


'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires.
'47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle.
'54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed.
'55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
large port big valve D shaped combustion chamber

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
i'm guessing early to mid 50's.i think all these big port heads were the same except for the 270 H head mine is the standard 302 D shape combustion chamber.
Jay D.

Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,986
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,986
Casting number from the head would help answer "which one do you have?"

Here is a list.


'57 GMC 102, Original 347 V8, HydraMatic, 3.08 rear gear, added A/C, disk front brakes, HEI, AFB carb, '98 Honda Black Currant paint. T-boned and totaled 10/12
'52 GMC 152 Stake Bed, Original 228, SM420, added A/C, HEI, disk front brakes, '67 Chev 3.55 rear gear. Gets used as a real truck.
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
I don't have the head here right now its at the machine shop 100 miles away. i was with the thought that the valves on the big port heads were all the same???
Jay D.

Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 232
6
'Bolter
'Bolter
6 Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 232
I know both my 302 heads (983) got Chevy stainless V8 valves.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
THANKYOU kinda what i thought buy wasn't quite sure.
Jay D.

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28,674
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Offline
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 28,674
It's possible for a good machinist to alter either/or both the stem length and head diameter on a valve that's close to the dimensions of an original equipment item. If the stem is shortened and new keeper grooves are machined, use a hardened steel lash cap to prevent wear to the top of the stem.
Jerry


"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
jay d #1558955 09/26/2024 12:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,609
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 1,609


Mike
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
I used to build a lot of GMC heads. As far as I know casting number 2193983 is the only one that fits a 302. They can either have rotating or non rotating valves. We used rotating valves 60 something years ago when we still worked GMC engines. But I see no reason for rotating valves in an engine that is built today. Adjusting them is very critical. I still have the tool to adjust the rotating valves, but I will probably never use it because I just don't see the reason for rotating valves. GMC 302 valves used to be everywhere because the government had so many spare parts for their 302 engines. There may still be some on eBay. I always pressed in cast iron guides and then reamed them to fit. I always reamed them to the maximum clearance number. Most machine shops are afraid to press guides out and back in. They use bronze. But again I would use caution to make sure that they give the stems enough clearance. You must remember that this family of engines was engineered 85 years ago and the 302 was introduced over 70 years ago. And those engines required wider clearances than modern engines. I have seen so many newly built engines fail because they didn't have enough stem clearance. I still have a bunch of valves, but none of them are boxed. I have always just matched like for like
Attachments
Valve Specs.jpg (58.33 KB, 58 downloads)
Valves.jpg (207.78 KB, 56 downloads)

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
Originally Posted by Hotrod Lincoln
It's possible for a good machinist to alter either/or both the stem length and head diameter on a valve that's close to the dimensions of an original equipment item. If the stem is shortened and new keeper grooves are machined, use a hardened steel lash cap to prevent wear to the top of the stem.
Jerry
YEP, talked to the machine shop and they are up to speed on useing the chevy v8 valves thanks!
Jay D.

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 160
Originally Posted by crenwelge
I used to build a lot of GMC heads. As far as I know casting number 2193983 is the only one that fits a 302. They can either have rotating or non rotating valves. We used rotating valves 60 something years ago when we still worked GMC engines. But I see no reason for rotating valves in an engine that is built today. Adjusting them is very critical. I still have the tool to adjust the rotating valves, but I will probably never use it because I just don't see the reason for rotating valves. GMC 302 valves used to be everywhere because the government had so many spare parts for their 302 engines. There may still be some on eBay. I always pressed in cast iron guides and then reamed them to fit. I always reamed them to the maximum clearance number. Most machine shops are afraid to press guides out and back in. They use bronze. But again I would use caution to make sure that they give the stems enough clearance. You must remember that this family of engines was engineered 85 years ago and the 302 was introduced over 70 years ago. And those engines required wider clearances than modern engines. I have seen so many newly built engines fail because they didn't have enough stem clearance. I still have a bunch of valves, but none of them are boxed. I have always just matched like for like
what was the difference in the 302 and 270H head, just combustion chamber size? i believe the 270 H had a flat top piston and the d shape 302 had a pop up style piston. i'm going to put this 302 head on a 270 with the stock pistons, W/slight dish ( for now) thus my compression ratio is going to be low. i haven't had a chance to get all the parts together to check the CR yet. low compression it going to work for me as i'm going to turbo this engine.
Jay D.
.

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
C
'Bolter
'Bolter
C Offline
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,903
The H head was very rare. It came out when the government wanted more horsepower and GMC built the H head in 51 and 52 while they were developing the 302. I have in my notes that the H head was casting number was 2193417. But I am not real sure about that. I think the H head still used a domed piston. I know it had the large intake ports that used a single barrel carburetor. A 302 manifold would fit but it used a 2 barrel carburetor. In civilian use it used a 3 bolt Holley and government applications used a 4 bolt that accepts a WW Stromberg. The correct manifold for an H head is a single barrel carburetor. If I remember correctly GMC did not change pistons for the H head. The H head raised the compression for the old dome pistons and used larger intake and intake ports. 2136477 and 6107412 castings were for the domed 228, 2194819 were for the flat piston 228, 248 and 270, 2193417 were for the H Head and is for all 302 engines. All of the GMC heads use the same bolt pattern, but the ones for domed pistons have to have domed pistons or you will have hardly any compression. The ones for flat pistons need flat pistons because the domes will hit them. See what the casting numbers are on the heads you have. I only had one H head in my lifetime and it stayed on the engine until the vehicle was stolen. So I really don't have first hand knowledge if the 270 with the H head had a flat or domed piston. But i remember correctly everyone was looking for H heads 60 to 70 years ago to get more power out of their 228 and 248 engines . Post some photos of the casting numbers and the shape of the combustion chambers. The combustion chambers are drastically different for domed pistons and flat pistons.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 1.039s Queries: 15 (0.040s) Memory: 0.6630 MB (Peak: 0.7866 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 16:09:31 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS