The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 525 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,270
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 100
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 100
I think I had read somewhere that the “enclosed drive” center chunk / pumpkin / 3rd member will interchange with a 1955 1st series “open drive” pumpkin…..allowing to change my 1946 to open drive and a modern transmission…..while still using the original axle housing, axles and brakes.

I have searched other archives but can’t find any info.

Does anyone know if this is correct?

I’m thinking this would save a lot of work if I could just change the pumpkin out, (wouldn’t have to change spring perches, wouldn’t have to redo my brakes, wouldn’t have to drop the springs, etc. Obviously, I’d have to have the drive shaft altered to fit and connect to the transmission I chose to go with…..but this seems like an easier swap in my mind.

I have an opportunity to purchase an entire 1955 1st series differential unit. It’s not here, so I can’t visually compare.


Care taker of a 1946 1/2 ton. Pretty much period correct original. Danny T, from B’ham, Al
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,955
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,955
The spring perches are different I believe your truck if like my 54 will have the bushings we’re as the newer 55 has the solid no bushing .I think it makes a difference but others will chime in


kevinski
1954 GMC 9300
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 100
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Aug 2022
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by KEVINSKI
The spring perches are different I believe your truck if like my 54 will have the bushings we’re as the newer 55 has the solid no bushing .I think it makes a difference but others will chime in

Thanks Kevinski, that’s why I was asking about changing out JUST the center pumpkin between the two differentials. That way I’d retain my existing rear end housing, perches, springs, brakes, etc.


Care taker of a 1946 1/2 ton. Pretty much period correct original. Danny T, from B’ham, Al
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 270
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 270
It should work just fine. I used a 57 1/2-ton pumpkin in 40 housing.

Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 854
1
'Bolter
'Bolter
1 Offline
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 854
I believe you'll have to add something like traction bars used on drag cars to stabelize the housing relative to the frame. As I recall my 48 half ton had a pivot point at each spring with a rubber bushing. Absent the torque tube the housing can wind up on acceleration. I had a 53 car with a Pontiac rear end bolted solid to the springs and a '53 331 Cad engine. Under hard acceleration the housing wound up far enough to break the u-joint yoke. I added traction bars, sometimes called radius arms, and that cured the problem. The springs weren't strong enough to hold the torque by themselves. The situation is worse with the torque tube housing because of the pivots.


1951 3800 1-ton
"Earning its keep from the get-go"
In the DITY Gallery
1962 261 (w/cam, Fenton headers, 2 carbs, MSD ign.), SM420 & Brown-Lipe 6231A 3spd aux. trans, stock axles & brakes. Owned since 1971.
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,986
B
'Bolter
'Bolter
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 1,986
As said above, the torque tube axle housing has to rotate where it attaches to the rear springs as the rear wheels move up and down. You will have to find a way to "capture" the axle to the springs when you convert to an open driveshaft. It's been done before.


'57 GMC 102, Original 347 V8, HydraMatic, 3.08 rear gear, added A/C, disk front brakes, HEI, AFB carb, '98 Honda Black Currant paint. T-boned and totaled 10/12
'52 GMC 152 Stake Bed, Original 228, SM420, added A/C, HEI, disk front brakes, '67 Chev 3.55 rear gear. Gets used as a real truck.
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
The easiest way to avoid the issue with the rubber mounts of the torque tube is to weld on solid spring perches available from most vendors. You will likely need to cut off the rubber-mounted perches to make room for the new perches.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 73
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 73
DL, the swap will work. I did a 55 in to my 54 GMC. Keep the axles straight to which is right and which is left. Mine were different lengths. For the pivots. Set the Angle. I had a machinist make a set of perches to weld on the back side, changed out the U-Bolt plate, and added a U-Bolt.
Attachments
IMG_9747.jpeg (207.44 KB, 3 downloads)

Last edited by KDrown; 09/14/2025 1:33 AM. Reason: Add Photo
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by KDrown
DL, the swap will work. I did a 55 in to my 54 GMC. Keep the axles straight to which is right and which is left. Mine were different lengths. For the pivots. Set the Angle. I had a machinist make a set of perches to weld on the back side, changed out the U-Bolt plate, and added a U-bolt.
Pictures sure would help.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 333
E
'Bolter
'Bolter
E Offline
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 333
I put a 55-59 truck center section in my 50 truck housing. We cut off the pivoting perches and welded on solid perches. My friend has done the same thing with a 39 truck housing installed in his 30 Chevy coupe to convert to open drive. 3.90 gears and T5's in both.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 73
K
'Bolter
'Bolter
K Offline
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 73
I’ll get those up later this week

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by EchoBravoSierra
I put a 55-59 truck center section in my 50 truck housing. We cut off the pivoting perches and welded on solid perches. My friend has done the same thing with a 39 truck housing installed in his 30 Chevy coupe to convert to open drive. 3.90 gears and T5's in both.
A 3.90 gear set with a T-5 with .72 overdrive with stock height 28" tires is about as dialed in as it could get for a 216, 235, 261 Stovebolt.
There is an old adage, "There is no such thing as free lunch". Not true at all with the advent of putting a T-5 behind a Stovebolt.
I sure would like to know who the first person was who did it.

Last edited by 52Carl; 08/13/2024 12:51 AM. Reason: Don't English good...

1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.068s Queries: 15 (0.025s) Memory: 0.6548 MB (Peak: 0.7606 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 07:58:21 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS