| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
0 members (),
177
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,113 Posts1,056,619 Members48,450 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 346 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 346 | Getting ready to replace the driveshaft carrier bearing and have a question about the carrier hanger bracket. Hanger Top Hanger Bottom I think the square stock welded to the bracket is part of an overdone repair. Is there any type of spacer supposed to go between this bracket and the bearing carrier??? TIA
'38 Chevy 1-1/2 ton '49 Chevy 1/2 ton '54 Chevy 6400 2 ton '55.2 GMC 3/4 ton '56 GMC 1-ton
No Room Left in Shop
| | | | | Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 586 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 586 | Just large flat washers. How is the drive shaft angle with that hunk of steel welded on the bottom ?
Wanted Good Woman: Must be able to cook , clean , sew , tune engines and polish trucks. Must have old Stovebolt and garage. Please send picture of old Stovebolt and garage.
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2004 Posts: 5,708 | I was going to ask about the angle too, but looking closely, it doesn't appear the piece is actually welded to the top, but more one the front edge.
This would position the center bearing more toward the rear, but there is probably adequate spline to accommodate this shift. I could be all wet in how thing mounts though.
Stuart | | | | | Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 346 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2000 Posts: 346 | Driveshaft was to low in the middle by the thickness of the big chunk of steel. The piece is welded to the bottom and spaced the bearing carrier down the same amount.
Eyeballing it, it looked like the center joints were lower than both the transmission and the rear end.
'38 Chevy 1-1/2 ton '49 Chevy 1/2 ton '54 Chevy 6400 2 ton '55.2 GMC 3/4 ton '56 GMC 1-ton
No Room Left in Shop
| | | | | Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 116 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 116 | I had a guy tell me once that the U-joints had to have an angle to them to properly lubricate and reduce wear. His argument was the joint will displace the lub and run dry in one spot if not flexed by an angled driveshaft. I always thought the straighter the better. It's clear in the chart shown in the link above that any joint angle >3 degrees reduces the expected life of the joint. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 . | | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,878 | Straighter the better, but only to a point. As you said, they do need a little angle to cause some movement for even wear and lubrication.
In the "Installation Techniques" manual (second of the two links above):
Rule #1, Universal joint operating angles at each end of a driveshaft should always be at least 1 degree.
Rule #2, Universal joint operating angles on each end of a driveshaft should always be equal within 1 degree of each other (1/2 degree for motor homes and shafts in front of transfer case or auxiliary device).
Rule #3, For virtual vibration free performance, universal joint operation angles should not bee larger than 3 degrees. If they are make sure they don't exceed the maximum recommended angles.
Grigg | | |
| |
| |