| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,154 Posts1,056,851 Members48,456 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Mar 2021 Posts: 24 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2021 Posts: 24 | I am on the hunt for information regarding the 261 oil canister for my 261. I bought the engine without an oil canister. Is there a big filtration difference with the OEM like the one at the top in this link that seems to have the oil filter spin onto the OEM mount vs the type that you drop an oil filter into the canister? 261Thanx in advance! | | | | | Joined: Oct 2021 Posts: 6,926 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2021 Posts: 6,926 | The reality is that there is no appreciable difference in the amount of oil filtered by the two types of filters.
Figures I've seen show that the canister type with the replaceable paper element filters about 87% of the oil whereas the spin-on type filters 92% of the oil under the same conditions/engine hrs.
For pampered vehicles like ours that aren't pushed to the limit and whose oil is changed frequently (3 mos, 3000 mi), you are not going to notice any difference in your lifetime.
The real key to extending engine life is frequent oil changes. There are plenty of antique vehicles with 100,000+ miles still driving around that have never had an oil filter installed on their engines.
Engine oil is contaminated more from blow-by gases and condensation than anything likely to get caught in a filter (unless your engine is shedding metal pieces).
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)
1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
| | | | | Joined: Mar 2021 Posts: 24 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2021 Posts: 24 | The reality is that there is no appreciable difference in the amount of oil filtered by the two types of filters.
Figures I've seen show that the canister type with the replaceable paper element filters about 87% of the oil whereas the spin-on type filters 92% of the oil under the same conditions/engine hrs.
For pampered vehicles like ours that aren't pushed to the limit and whose oil is changed frequently (3 mos, 3000 mi), you are not going to notice any difference in your lifetime. With that said, do I want a larger canister like that used for the bigger 261 vs the 235 engine? I have seen oil canisters listed as "Heavy duty"(larger in height) over the smaller 216/235 type(smaller)... or at this point would it just be what looks best in my engine bay? | | | | | Joined: Oct 2021 Posts: 6,926 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Oct 2021 Posts: 6,926 | I'd go with what you like best. The big ones would likely be used in severe service trucks like farm vehicles, mining trucks, desert use, heavy hauling, etc.
How many miles do you expect to put on your truck each year?
As you see, your truck never had a filter in the first place and the engine seems to have survived ok. Anything you install now is just an added bonus.
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)
1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
| | |
| |
| |