Just a note that the pictured yoke is actually the rear half of the torque tube universal joint assembly, which slides onto the drive shaft stub in your torque tube. The front yoke is the part that slides onto the transmission output shaft and should be secured with a large washer and bolt to that shaft (not shown in your pic).
After a bit of resource searching, I did find that there are some minor differences between the 3 spd and 4 spd torque tube u-joint yoke assemblies which you can see in the picture I found in our own member tclederman's web pages 3 Speed and 4 Speed u-joints. It provides a better comparison than what can be found in the parts books.
The picture doesn't give measurements, but clearly shows that the front yoke half of the u-joint assembly is longer for the 3 Speed vs the 4 Speed torque tube units.
A search of the 1929-54 Chevy Master Parts catalog shows that both rear halves of this u-joint assembly use the same rear yoke - GM# 3665768. So no difference at least in the length of the rear yoke section.
That resource also lists a different rear yoke for the 3/4 Ton enclosed front u-joint assembly as GM# 596911, but I couldn't find anywhere what the length of that yoke is to compare to the 1/2 Ton parts.
I guess the next question is, why do you need a longer yoke???
Dan
~ Dan 1951 Chevy 3 window 3100 Follow this story in the DITY Gallery "My Grandpa Carl's Truck and How it Became Mine" 1966 Chevelle (Wife's Hot Rod) | 2013 Chevy Silverado (Current daily driver) US Army MSG Retired (1977-1998) | Com Fac Maint Lead Tech Retired (1998-2021)
Your last added picture makes it look like something isn't installed correctly. Your torque tube should be a lot farther forward from what little can be seen. Can you take and add pictures showing your rear axle placement on the springs and engine/transmission placement???
Am guessing you haven't tried to install a different axle/torque tube into your truck, have you?
Dan
Last edited by Gdads51; 08/06/20233:23 PM.
~ Dan 1951 Chevy 3 window 3100 Follow this story in the DITY Gallery "My Grandpa Carl's Truck and How it Became Mine" 1966 Chevelle (Wife's Hot Rod) | 2013 Chevy Silverado (Current daily driver) US Army MSG Retired (1977-1998) | Com Fac Maint Lead Tech Retired (1998-2021)
Mike Short story long. Original 49 frame rusted out. Bought replacement frame complete looks to be 50s. Motor and Transmission out of original frame. Does that make more sense
Is the donor frame a 3100 frame same as the old one? Or maybe a 3600 frame with a longer wheelbase that’s throwing length off? Do you still have old frame and rear end to measure and compare.
Just a thought, but someone could have moved the rear axle back to center the rear wheels in the fender openings.
'57 GMC 102, Original 347 V8, HydraMatic, 3.08 rear gear, added A/C, disk front brakes, HEI, AFB carb, '98 Honda Black Currant paint. T-boned and totaled 10/12 '52 GMC 152 Stake Bed, Original 228, SM420, added A/C, HEI, disk front brakes, '67 Chev 3.55 rear gear. Gets used as a real truck.
The donor frame came with the rear end but the OP is using his engine and 4 speed. Possibly the donor truck had a trans other than a 4 speed that was different in length??
That’s what I’m wondering. Can I take the rear yoke to driveshaft place and have it lengthen or can I find a front yoke from 3 speed and put that in there
I've had driveshafts made by driveline shops before when I brought them the two yokes. Make sure you get the length needed exactly correct. It has to allow for in and out movement to allow for suspension travel, of course.
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy) 1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1956 Cadillac Sixty Special Fleetwood (The Godfather) | 1966 Oldsmobile Toronado (The Purple Knif) | 1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe | 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
It would seem as though the longer part of the 3 speed yoke is the end into the trans. That will not help you. Just a thought on the frame........is it possible it is indeed a half ton frame, but from a GMC? They are just a touch longer.
1947.2 GMC 1/2T SWB panel 1947.2 GMC 1/2T long bed 1948 GMC 1/2T short bed
I've had driveshafts made by driveline shops before when I brought them the two yokes. Make sure you get the length needed exactly correct. It has to allow for in and out movement to allow for suspension travel, of course.
Oh right. Too many threads with too many different trucks. I can't keep them all straight.
1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy) 1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1956 Cadillac Sixty Special Fleetwood (The Godfather) | 1966 Oldsmobile Toronado (The Purple Knif) | 1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe | 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Stock 3100 shock absorbers from 50 and later trucks are mounted outboard of the frame. The OP's pic shows coilover shocks mounted inboard of the frame. So it seems like something is off. Here's a pic of a stock axle mounting.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truck Follow this saga in Project Journal Photos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
As a hopeful help to go along with Mike B's suggestion to get the tape measure out and start checking your frame and wheel base measurements, you can compare your measurements to the charts in this GM Heritage Center resource document 1949 Chevrolet Truck Data.
You will find the different wheel base and frame measurements for the many different models in the early section of the document that include drawings of the trucks with points of measurement for each model.
This doesn't address the possibility that you got a GMC frame instead of a Chevy. I found this long ago thread on the GMC VS CHEVY that points out that among the difference, the front cross member/engine mount is farther forward on the GMC to allow for the slightly longer GMC I6's installation. If (?) you got a GMC frame and installed your Chevy engine (216/235/261) without changing the front cross member location, that possibly could account for your engine/transmission now sitting farther forward and no longer matching up with your rear axle/torque tube location.
Let us know what you figure out and we can try and provide more help.
Dan
~ Dan 1951 Chevy 3 window 3100 Follow this story in the DITY Gallery "My Grandpa Carl's Truck and How it Became Mine" 1966 Chevelle (Wife's Hot Rod) | 2013 Chevy Silverado (Current daily driver) US Army MSG Retired (1977-1998) | Com Fac Maint Lead Tech Retired (1998-2021)
This frame had 235 and 4 speed in it when I picked it up. I had my 235 rebuild and put it in with other tranny. I’m thinking switching out transmission and see. Tape measure shows other transmission longer but not easiest to measure.
LMC's diagrams are for open driveline rear axles. It's basically showing the same as the FAM Section 4 Sheet 1.00, which is 54-55 style suspension mounting. The OP's rear axle does appear to have the pivot mounts that are used for torque tube axles.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truck Follow this saga in Project Journal Photos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Well I solved my dilemma. Turns out this is a 41-46 four speed tranny and Bellhousings. Not quite the same. Also learned a ru and up transmission won’t bolt into the Bellhousings. Thanks for everyone’s help. As always appreciate it
Ah ... the ole Assumption Monster raises its ugly head yet again.
The reminder for all of us is this .... when dealing with used parts, never assume they are what you think they are (or want them to be). Ask questions. Confirm.
Just because it *looks* right doesn't mean it *is* right. When things that are supposed to fit don't, there's usually a really simple answer as to why not. If it isn't forthcoming, back up a few more steps until it is.
Just bringing this up as a gentle nudge to the greybeards to remember before we get carried away and head off to the fabricator shop to make things work that aren't working. Been through this myself.
Sometimes, you just have the wrong parts.
~ John
"We are not now that strength which in old days Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are"
1948 International Farmall Super A 1949 Chevrolet 3804 In the Legacy Gallery | In the Gallery Forum 1973 IH 1310 Dump 2001 International/AmTran RE3000 "Skoolie" 2014 Ford E-350 4x4 (Quigley)
Also learned a ru and up transmission won’t bolt into the Bellhousings.
Did you slip down one row on the keyboard trying to type 47? I'm "assuming" that's what happened and trying to help clarify.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truck Follow this saga in Project Journal Photos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.