The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (dt235sd, Gdads51, klhansen), 81 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,205
Posts1,057,427
Members48,471
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 73
A
'Bolter
'Bolter
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 73
I’m hoping to get some thoughts on the anti-squeak/gasket that goes between the running board and the rear fender. I purchased some replacements and they surprised me how thin they are. In looking around it sounds like the thought is that these „replacements“ are nothing more then 15# roofing felt. I came across some reading that some people have used 30# roofing felt. Or even have doubled up the 30# felt by gluing them together. I might just do this. I have the cheap replacements as a pattern. I was wondering if anyone has used something else like a rubber instead. My seam between the two is decent but not perfect. Some type of a compressible material would clean it up.

Also doesn’t the filler panel on top of the running board also come into contact with the fender? Mine does at least. Why isn’t there any type of a gasket/seal there? Other than there really isn’t much of a lip on the filler panel.

Any thoughts on these two topics is appreciated. Thank you.

Adam


Adam
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 734
S
'Bolter
'Bolter
S Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 734
Need a new set of running boards because mine are pretty beat up. No way a paper gasket is gonna fill the gap, so I traced the shape onto extra thick motorcycle inner tube. You can get them 4-6mm thick and probably thicker than that. Even standard inner tube would be better for my purpose than the paper gasket.
Attachments
IMG_9442.jpeg (126.43 KB, 150 downloads)
IMG_9441.jpeg (201.32 KB, 148 downloads)
IMG_9440.jpeg (185.82 KB, 149 downloads)
IMG_9443.jpeg (195.19 KB, 149 downloads)


Matthew 6:33

1952 Chevy 1/2-ton 3100
Late '55 235/SM420/torque tube 3.55
Dalton Highway survivor (using original 216)
www.truckwithaheart.com
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,186
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,186
Originally Posted by Adamg
Also doesn’t the filler panel on top of the running board also come into contact with the fender? Mine does at least. Why isn’t there any type of a gasket/seal there? Other than there really isn’t much of a lip on the filler panel.
Yes, yes they do. ohwell
I may try to put something in there, maybe glued to the apron.
Attachments
IMG_5679.JPG (113.8 KB, 141 downloads)


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,048
Gearhead, Stovebolt Tech and Parts Tracker, Mod for Swap Meet and GTT
Gearhead, Stovebolt Tech and Parts Tracker, Mod for Swap Meet and GTT
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,048
Skooter,

That's a great solution to the problem. thumbs_up

Thanks for sharing! shake


~ Dan
1951 Chevy 3 window 3100
Follow this story in the DITY Gallery
"My Grandpa Carl's Truck and How it Became Mine"
1966 Chevelle (Wife's Hot Rod) | 2013 Chevy Silverado (Current daily driver)
US Army MSG Retired (1977-1998) | Com Fac Maint Lead Tech Retired (1998-2021)
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,969
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,969
Well, three of mine are about an inch away from the nearest fender. I never knew they were supposed to touch!


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,186
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,186
Originally Posted by Otto Skorzeny
Well, three of mine are about an inch away from the nearest fender. I never knew they were supposed to touch!
Not sure they're supposed to touch. My original aprons were scrunched down pretty badly, which probably caused that wear spot in the fender. Lots of squeaking going down the road. frown


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 73
A
'Bolter
'Bolter
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 73
It’s kind of a strange connection to me. The perfectionist in me says to get a nice joint/seam between the apron and fender. But I’m wondering if the intent was a gap but it’d be a very small gap and would make sense why they didn’t put any type of anti-squeak material on it. But a small gap would collect dirt and moisture. So a tighter gap would be better for that but then again no material between the pieces and the flange is so small on the apron you can’t hardly attach anything there. It’s just a strange area to me.


Adam
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,969
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,969
Since the cab and the bed are two separate entities that twist and flex in different directions, I'm sort of surprised that the running board would touch the fenders at all, even with a thin piece of felt or rubber between them.


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 73
A
'Bolter
'Bolter
A Offline
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 73
The cab isn’t bolted to the running boards. So the flex can be there. There’s a large gap between the running boards and the front fender. The running boards are bolted to the support arms from the frame and the rear fender so that’s where the solid connection is.


Adam
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,186
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,186
The cab and front clip are really the only things that move relative to the frame. The bed, rear fenders, and running boards are rigidly attached to the frame. That's why the rear fenders attach to the running board, while the front fenders do not.
[on edit] Looks like Adam got there while I was typing.

Last edited by klhansen; 01/09/2023 2:16 AM.

Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,969
O
'Bolter
'Bolter
O Offline
Joined: Oct 2021
Posts: 6,969
OK. That makes more sense. With about an inch of space between my fron fenders and the running boards , I didn't see how they could ever connect.
One of my rears is close but the other is a half inch or so away.


1950 Chevrolet 3100 (Ol' Roy)

1939 Packard Standard Eight Coupe (The Phantom) | 1956 Cadillac Coupe de Ville (The Bismarck) | 1964 Ford Galaxie 500 coupe |1966 Ford Mustang (Little Red) | 1969 Pontiac GTO (The Dishpit) I 1979 Ford F-100 | 1976 Ford F-150 (Big Red) | 1995 Ford F-150 (Newt)
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,310
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,310
The rear fenders can be moved fore or aft to close the gap between the running board and the front edge of the rear fender. You can probably get some more adjustment by loosening the running board-to-bracket bolts and nudge the running boards fore or aft.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission

Moderated by  klhansen 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0