The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (DredKt, homer52, 46 Texaco, Guitplayer, BLUEMEANIE, 1 invisible), 572 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,778
Posts1,039,287
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1446879 04/03/2022 12:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
T
6 heaven
6 heaven
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
How would an AD body fit onto a task force frame? Basically, would a 50 -54 body fit onto a 56-59 frame fairly easily? Seems like maybe an easy "upgrade". You would get better 6 cylinder engine and open driveline and Bendix brakes.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
B
Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
A 56ish front TF suspension was bolted/welded to an AD frame.
The tires were rubbing the fenders.
Attachments
1954 C&B Dim.jpg (74.13 KB, 61 downloads)
1956 C&B Dim.jpg (93.45 KB, 62 downloads)

Last edited by buoymaker; 04/03/2022 5:40 PM.

"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use."
"I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
It is easy enough to do the Bendix upgrades, and the improved full pressure, inert bearing engine swap on an AD chassis.
The Task Force truck drive train is not a vast improvement over a '54 AD, not to mention the front wheels will hit the front fenders. ( I guess I just did mention it, but nevertheless...)


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
T
6 heaven
6 heaven
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 116
Thanks! Do you mean the width will cause a problem with rubbing, or will they rub on the front fender or rear fender?

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
B
Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
The rear is okay.

From diagrams:
1956 front 60.52"
1954 front 57.03"

60.52-57.03 = 3.49"
Divided by 2 = 1.745"

The edge of the tire is 1 3/4" closer to the fender.
Appearance wise it is a little noticeable.

Turn steering wheel to maximum left (as an example).
Now hit a pot hole where the front axle goes up.
The problem can be worse if you are running wider modern tires.


"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use."
"I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.036s Queries: 15 (0.033s) Memory: 0.6082 MB (Peak: 0.6696 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 17:33:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS