BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
7 members (TUTS 59, DES57, BLUEMEANIE, Peggy M, Waveski, 55shaker, Joe W),
535
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,282 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 | Hello all,
My brother and I are resurrecting a 1941 Chevrolet 1/2 ton, with a rebuilt 235 (not 216) new clutch, and stock original 4 speed non-synchro transmission. With the engine idling at roughly 600 rpm, we are experiencing lots of gear clashing and crunching when shifting into either first or second with the clutch pedal pressed in. We have not been able to engage a gear, or at least we're reluctant to muscle into gear with all the clashing we're experiencing.
We have pretty much confirmed it's not an issue with the clutch, it's new and when the pedal is depressed there is clearance between the clutch face and flywheel. When the pedal is released the clutch contacts the flywheel.
When the transmission was out, we did a visual inspection of the gears with the top cover off and all gears appeared to be in good shape with no visible tooth chips, etc. We did not tear down the transmission, but mostly cleaned it out and replaced fluid. It seemed to be spinning without any binding or weirdness, so we didn't disassemble it. We think we had the shifter and cover installed correctly, as it seemed to shift through all 4 forward speeds and reverse.
Is it possible to install the shifter and cover incorrectly, so that it seems to be shifting gears correctly while the engine is not running, but shifting is not correct when the engine is running?
Is it likely we moved gears in the case to check out their condition, but they were never removed or disassembled by my brother or myself.. Is it possible the gears have to be in a certain arrangment when the cover/shifter goes back on? We believe we had the shifter forks in the correct position on the mainshaft.
Any suggestion or experience anyone has with this time of transmission would be appreciated. We really hope that we don't have to take this heavy piece of pig iron out again. Thanks...
Last edited by Charles Evans; 01/31/2022 9:51 PM. Reason: clarification
1941 Chevrolet AK 1/2 retrofitted with a 235 engine
| | | | Joined: May 2015 Posts: 9,830 Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums | Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums Joined: May 2015 Posts: 9,830 | How is the pilot bushing/bearing in the flywheel? If that's binding up the result will be the same as the clutch disc dragging.
Kevin 1951 Chevy 3100 work truckFollow this saga in Project JournalPhotos 1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car) Busting rust since the mid-60's If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together. | | | | Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 | Thanks for replying Kevin. We replaced the pilot bushing, and I have had experience in setting bronze pilot bushings, so I don't think the problem is there.
1941 Chevrolet AK 1/2 retrofitted with a 235 engine
| | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,320 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,320 | If it grinds when putting it in gear, that means the gears are still turning. Not a transmission problem, but a clutch problem. How much free play do you have on your clutch pedal?
You may want to try starting it in gear, with the back end off the ground. You can then put the brakes on and see then if the clutch will disengage at all. You may have the disc in backwards.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,674 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,674 | Ditto on the backwards disc. The springs in the hub of the disc stick out further on one side than the other, and if they are installed with the springs toward the flywheel they will drag on the flywheel to crankshaft bolt heads and cause the disc to keep spinning even with the clutch pedal depressed. Hold the clutch pedal down, put the trans into gear, and then start the engine. If the springs are dragging, they will make grinding noise as they touch the bolt heads. The thicker portion of the disc hub is supposed to protrude into the pressure plate- - - -not face the flywheel. Most replacement discs have either a paper label or a stamping that says "flywheel side". Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 | I will check the possibility of a backwards disk, but I don't think that's the problem. I have installed a good number of clutch disks, and pretty much know which way they go and always check any labels/instructions attached to parts. The possiblity of disk drag is a good thing to check. however. I did adjust the "eye hook" bolt so that the pedal has about 3/4" to 1 inch free travel, like the book says, but it could be dragging enough to cause engagement issues when the pedal is depressed. Thanks for the suggestions.
Last edited by Charles Evans; 02/02/2022 7:52 PM. Reason: Grammar
1941 Chevrolet AK 1/2 retrofitted with a 235 engine
| | | | Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2017 Posts: 31 | It was clutch drag.
New clutch, new pressure plate, new throwout bearing, new pilot bushing, not adjusted enough!
It turned out that the eye bolt that had to be adjusted with the nut all the way in. Now it engages properly.
Weird about the hardware. It's a shouldered eyebolt, original GM issue. Did GM just go to a hardware store to pick up some of its "specialized" parts way back then? I can see closing up the inner aperture of the eyebolt hole would take up some of the free play in the clutch pedal. The shop manual spec of 3/4" to 1" freeplay is excessive, at least in this case. There is still freeplay in the clutch pedal (just not as much) but enough so that the throwout bearing is not spinning when the clutch pedal is off.
I thank those who responded to my post.....Charles Evans
1941 Chevrolet AK 1/2 retrofitted with a 235 engine
| | | | Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,320 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2001 Posts: 5,320 | I think you will find that after a little use, you will be able to get adjust it to factory specs. Some of the high spots on the new disc need to be worn down.
See the USA in your vintage Chevrolet! My Blog | | | | Joined: Feb 2016 Posts: 1,841 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2016 Posts: 1,841 | When I replaced the clutch in mine, I had to tighten the eye and bush the other linkage ends in order to take up the wear, I have to have the peddle ALMOST at the floor to disengage but that's what the shop manual calls for.
1957 Chevrolet 5700 LCF 283 SM420 2 speed rear, 1955 IH 300U T/A, 1978 Corvette 350 auto, 1978 Yamaha DT175, 1999 Harley Davidson Softail Fat Boy
| | |
| |