The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
9 members (Charles in CA, Peggy M, TUTS 59, 46 Texaco, Southerntruck, BC59, Stewart2, 2 invisible), 554 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,776
Posts1,039,271
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1426259 10/08/2021 2:43 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
Just pulled the head on a 216 from my ‘53 1/2 ton.. Found blown head gasket but worse is a very worn head. Luckily have a top notch guy who is rebuilding.. I bought the truck from a broker in 2014. Receipts showed 80k restoration. Beautiful truck, very well done (except for the engine) for a fraction of the cost of the restoration.. Anyhow, while it’s cool to have the original 216, I’ve always wished it came with a 235.. It seems the original customer may have gotten the wool pulled over his eyes. This motor has a lot of miles on it. Which brings me to my dilemma. I can get her running again, the lower end is suspect. Had the thought to find a 235 and start a s!ow rebuild but seems they are scarce.. She’s been a Sunday driver but I’ve decided to use it more than that. How hard is it to find a 235 ??? Am I better off pulling the 216 and doing a first rate rebuild??? Any thoughts would be appreciated
One more bit of info. Wasn’t burning any appreciable oil, compression around 90 average. Thanks

Rizzo #1426263 10/08/2021 3:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,100
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,100
Not that scarce. do searches on your local Craigs List and eBay. There is also a 55 235 for sale in the Truck Parts For Sale forum right now. Here is a [LINK]. Not sure if it has sold.
I would also place an ad in the Truck Parts Wanted forum.

Last edited by Phak1; 10/08/2021 3:08 PM.

Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Rizzo #1426277 10/08/2021 5:05 PM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
B
Curmudgeon
Curmudgeon
B Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,659
I'm not trying to torpedo your post, but I just now looked at your "216 Head Removal" posting.
I hope Jerry (Hot Rod Lincoln) or one of the other more experienced guys reads this.
First thought I have, has this engine been running too lean?

Your description said, "No smoke, no overheating, no coolant loss, no milky oil".
It looks to me that the head gasket burned (material vaporized, see previous posting picture) from overheat.
You also mention, "duel zenith carbs". Interesting. I wonder if they are sized/adjusted correctly.

Maybe this is something to look at before you swap parts over to a 235.


"Adding CFM to a truck will only help at engine speeds you don't want to use."
"I found there was nothing to gain beyond 400 CFM."
buoymaker #1426284 10/08/2021 6:16 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
No worries᠁. Trying to figure out if it was a poor engine “rebuild” or something I contributed to. A little of both I think. Didn’t realize a lean issue can take out a head gasket like that. I am going to recruit someone more knowledgeable on setting carbs,
ect. and run this engine out while I find and build a 235. She’s a keeper for sure. The body shop did a superb job, but when you farm out the engine᠁᠁.not so good. Appreciate you weighing in. Just trying to head the right direction from here. Thanks

Rizzo #1426288 10/08/2021 6:27 PM
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 296
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 296
I replaced my original 216 with a late-50's 261 and it made a wonderful difference. Still runs/drives like an "old truck", but much more UMPH under the gas pedal and much smoother running. I would likely be just as happy with a 235 though.

Last edited by Green_98; 10/08/2021 6:28 PM.

-Patrick
1953 Chevrolet 3100
261 / 4-speed / 4:11 / Commercial Red

Rizzo #1426290 10/08/2021 6:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
I have run 216s, 235s, and 261s.

Each "step up" resulted (as expected) in a noticeable difference in power.

Another "swap" that results in a noticeable different in gas mileage and "smoother" running is to install the 3.55 rear-end conversion gear-set (R&P Ring&Pinion set sold my MotherTrucker). Buy and use an installation-parts kit that is available from a few old-chevy-parts vendors.

tclederman #1426310 10/08/2021 9:20 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
Thanks for the input᠁ Will a 261 bolt right up?

Rizzo #1426317 10/08/2021 10:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Depends on what year engine is bolting up to what year/type drive train.

Most likely you will need to install this water pump relocation plate.

What transmission & drive-shaft & rear-end will you be using?

tclederman #1426344 10/09/2021 1:22 PM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
I’d like to use the 3 speed I currently have. Have already located a 235. Will have some time to sort it out as I’ll have the 216 running shortly. This is a a blessing in disguise. The truck will be much more useable as I won’t go on the freeway for fear of being run over. The suggestion to change the rear end gears is a good one too. A lot more fun to drive I think. Appreciate the input.

Rizzo #1426356 10/09/2021 4:03 PM
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
J
'Bolter
'Bolter
J Offline
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 2,074
When I picked up my '53 3600 the original 216 engine was knocking badly and since I had a rebuilt 235 on my engine stand, I went with that. This 235 has been a rock solid motor now for many years. Most use the adapter solving the low water pump issue, it's an easy swap for your 53. The perfect motor for my next build is a '55 first series 261, the very last high water pump motor and a bolt in, now just need more time and motivation.

Best of luck


It's easier to get forgiveness than permission!
1946 1/2-Ton Chevy
1953 Chevy 3/4-ton Factory Stakebed
Rizzo #1426432 10/10/2021 3:52 PM
Joined: Nov 1995
Posts: 5,470
Bond Villain
Bond Villain
Joined: Nov 1995
Posts: 5,470
I agree with Jim and the others advocating for an early ('54 -'55 1st series -- or a crate motor built later but out of the '54 mold) 261. Bolt-in, easy swap, easier rebuild, more power, etc.etc. If you really want a driver, I say skip the 235 and go for the 261. Coupled with Tim's recommendation for the rear ring and pinion swap, you'll have a vastly more driveable truck without losing the "old truck" feel and drive.

If you do all this, be sure to go through the truck's brakes and front end, too. Don't trust any of the previous owners/sellers/brokers -- it's *your* life to lose in an accident, not theirs.


~ John

"We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved earth and heaven; that which we are, we are"

1948 International Farmall Super A
1949 Chevrolet 3804
In the Legacy Gallery | In the Gallery Forum
1973 IH 1310 Dump
2001 International/AmTran RE3000 "Skoolie"
2014 Ford E-350 4x4 (Quigley)
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Originally Posted by John Milliman
. . .
If you do all this, be sure to go through the truck's brakes and front end, too. Don't trust any of the previous owners/sellers/brokers -- it's *your* life to lose in an accident, not theirs.

Heed John's advice: Check and set all front-end and brake-system parts to "factory specs".

Rizzo #1426457 10/10/2021 9:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,185
Leo Offline
Moderator
Moderator
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 4,185
I had that exact setup too, 261 with 3.55 rear gears. Top speed was over 85. Amazing torque for hills.

Rizzo #1426469 10/10/2021 10:47 PM
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
thumbs_up yes

tclederman #1426492 10/11/2021 3:32 AM
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
R
'Bolter
'Bolter
R Offline
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 26
Great advice from all. New to the forum and really glad I joined. 261 it is. I’m stoked to get started. Will help “make the truck a little more mine”. Thanks again. Look forward to more conversation.


Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.031s Queries: 14 (0.028s) Memory: 0.6643 MB (Peak: 0.7744 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 15:54:42 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS