The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (Guitplayer, Hotrod Lincoln, Bill Hanlon, Gdads51), 125 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,109
Posts1,056,271
Members48,439
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1417421 07/19/2021 10:27 PM
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
I am having an issue with the drum brakes pulling to the left on a hard stop. I’m trying to replace the front hoses and am having difficulty in getting the correct hoses. I went to my local NAPA dealer and was given NAPA part # UP 4900. The end that screws into the wheel cylinder is correct but the inlet side that the brake line screws into, is too big. My brake lines are 3/16” with 3/16” male inverter flare (3/8”-24). The NAPA hose is 7/16” female inverted flare 7/16”-20). The old hose has a 3/16” female inverted flare (3/8”-24).

I checked out retail stores and several online venders and they seem to match the same specifications as NAPA. The only vender that I found that had a sufficient description and had the correct hoses was Classic Parts. others like Chevys of the Fortys and LMC Truck may be correct, but there was no discription.I may have to order them, but I have a NYS inspection scheduled for Thursday and wanted to correct the issue.

I’m taking the old hose in to NAPA tomorrow to see if they can match one up, but I was hoping some other ‘bolter found what I am experiencing and can give me the correct part number.

P.S. Autozone and Advance Auto didn’t even have listings for any ‘52 Chevy parts.

Last edited by Phak1; 07/19/2021 10:28 PM.

Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,067
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,067
I bought AC Delco 18J3815 hoses from RockAuto, but they have the same brake line end threads as what you're finding. It wasn't an issue for me as I was building new brake lines, so just used the matching fitting. I can't be sure because they're gone now, but I believe the original hoses were the same. Do you have enough brake line that you could cut the flare off and get the larger thread fitting?


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Phil, the Classic Parts of America hose 71-307 should be correct. says: One end 7/16"-24 and other end 3/8"-24. Total length is 18".

They have a 71-305 that Napa could have given you. It's tricky, but you can see it misses 1952 1/2T.
"Fits 36-50 1/2 ton front & rear, 36-54 3/4 & 1 Ton Front and Rear and 55-59 3/4 & 1 Ton Rear. Both ends 7/16"-24. Total length is 16 1/2"

Always a good idea to buy from vendors who specialize in our trucks. Napa programmer/buyer missed this application gap.

The one Kevin mentions at Rockauto may have worked but it's application is not for 3100 front and the threads don't match what you say. Go with 71-307.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Kevin, that end has a reverse bend approximately 135°, very close to the fitting, so I can’t put on a new fitting. I may be able to find an reducing adaptor to work in the meantime. I’m headed to NAPA to see what they can do for me.

Thanks bartamos for confirming my suspicions. I strongly suspect, the solution will be to order the ones from Classic Parts.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,067
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,067
My understanding was that all three hoses for the 3100 were the same, which is why I did that. I'm pretty sure I saw that somewhere. They seem to fit fine.

Phil, I haven't seen an adapter that would go from reverse flare to reverse flare. But they might exist. A short section of tubing might do the trick, although it would be hanging out there and may flex too much.

Good luck.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
You are correct Kevin. The same hose fits the two fronts and the one rear. 71-307 or equivalent.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
W
Riding in the Passing Lane
Riding in the Passing Lane
W Offline
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,597
I have an old Napa catalog with pictures & sizes. It looks like part # 11146 matches the fittings & is 17 7/8 long. Part #,s 5784 & 36801 have the same fittings & are 16 in. long.

George


They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing.
1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne Super
In the Gallery Forum
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
I’m not going to take any chances jury rigging the hoses. There is too much riding on it working properly. I ordered three new ones from Classic Parts. In the meantime, I’m installing the old ones but I’ll swap the drivers for the passengers side, to see if that is the culprit.

I did go to NAPA today and they were no help. Thanks Kevin and bartamos for your advice!

Last edited by Phak1; 07/20/2021 10:34 PM.

Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,067
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,067
Yeah, don't cut corners with brakes.
NAPA being no help is no surprise. When I needed a single brake line for the MC to first division block, their website had a ton of different choices, but none of them gave the length. Kind of a critical piece of information. There's only one guy at our NAPA that knows what he's doing.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Originally Posted by Wrenchbender Ret.
I have an old Napa catalog with pictures & sizes. It looks like part # 11146 matches the fittings & is 17 7/8 long. Part #,s 5784 & 36801 have the same fittings & are 16 in. long.

George

When I was at NAPA, we looked at that hose. The end that goes into the wheel cylinder was too small. The thread size on the the original wheel cylinder is 7/16”-20. I’ve posted the specs on part 11146.

Thanks for looking for me anyway!
Attachments

Last edited by Phak1; 07/21/2021 11:29 PM.

Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
The original wheel cylinder is 7/16-20 ????? Wonder why the Classic hose is 7/16-24. I hope it's a typo on their part. Maybe their wheel cylinder is 7/16-24? Hope I didn't give you the wrong scoop.


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Originally Posted by bartamos
The original wheel cylinder is 7/16-20 ????? Wonder why the Classic hose is 7/16-24. I hope it's a typo on their part. Maybe their wheel cylinder is 7/16-24? Hope I didn't give you the wrong scoop.

I’m pretty sure it’s a typo. We’ll find out soon. It’s supposed to be delivered tomorrow, on a FedEx Sunday delivery.


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
AD Addict & Tinkerer
AD Addict & Tinkerer
Joined: Feb 2019
Posts: 4,482
Just received my hoses and the side that screws into the wheel cylinder measures 7/16”-20 TPI, so the Classic Parts description is wrong.

The other end has the correct description, 3/8”-24 female inverted flare.

So, bartamos, your off the hook! LOL


Phil
Moderator, The Engine Shop, Interiors and Project Journals

1952 Chevrolet 3100, Three on the Tree, 4:11 torque tube
Updated to: ‘59 235 w/hydraulic lifters, 12v w/alternator, HEI, PCV and Power front Disc Brakes
Project Journals
Stovebolt Gallery Forum
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Whew! smile


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0