The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
1 members (Movingeric), 487 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,270
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 152
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 152
Fellow Stovebolters; I see lots of 47 - 53 Chevy pickups that have eliminated the 2 fender to firewall braces that are stock on these trucks. I am wondering about the pros and cons of doing so. Can I live without them? What are the possible consequences? Are there well known considerations for eliminating these support structures? Thank you in advance for sharing your experience around this issue.


1952 Chevy 3100
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Those rods provide a tremendous amount of structural support of the entire front clip. They are used to adjust the front to rear positioning of each of the front fenders.
Without them, you will subject the sheet metal to a lot of undue stress, and make it very difficult to line up the front clip.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,115
G
Insomniac
Insomniac
G Offline
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,115
Sometime during the first 35 years of it's life, someone removed the braces from our truck. Accident repair or engine replacement? Whatever. Nowadays, the truck is always driven on paved roads, so I'm not concerned that they are gone.


Gord 🇨🇦
----
1954 1/2 ton 235 4 speed
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
Depends, are you going to use the stock radiator support or the aftermarket radiator support that bolts to the frame rails?

If using the stock setup, then I agree with 52Carl.

If you have decided to use the aftermarket setup, the radiator support is bolted to the frame rails and is much sturdier, eliminating the need for the rods IMHO. Went with aftermarket setup on my 51, 3100 and had no problem aligning the front sheet metal with the guidance gained from this site.


Dan

35 CC Case
38 Chevy Pickup
51 3100 AD
58 3100 Apache Fleetside
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 152
G
'Bolter
'Bolter
G Offline
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 152
Thank you all for sharing your knowledge and experience in this matter of the braces. I am building on an Art Morrison frame that is specifically built for the 47 - 53 3100s. I HOPED to use the stock radiator support frame mainly because the AME frame is boxed and the front cross member is welded, not riveted as is the case for the stock frame, so adapting to the after market radiator support structure is not as easy as it is on a stock frame. .. I know it is just metal and anything is possible ( I drilled through the boxed frame to mount the rear fuel tank) BUT... hoping to use the stock radiator support. Soooo, if I have to use the firewall braces, I will... now I am wondering if an LS3 motor will fit nicely underneath the stock braces. Time will tell. I would be even more bewildered if it were not for the excellent knowledge sharing on this forum. Thanks again.


1952 Chevy 3100
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 157
Gib70,

Take a look at Barnfind49 post #326. He has a picture of his 5.3 installed in his 49 with the firewall to fender braces in place.

My guess your LS3 will sit pretty low in your chassis setup. Shouldn’t be a problem.


Dan

35 CC Case
38 Chevy Pickup
51 3100 AD
58 3100 Apache Fleetside
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 678
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 678
Originally Posted by Gib70
Fellow Stovebolters; I see lots of 47 - 53 Chevy pickups that have eliminated the 2 fender to firewall braces that are stock on these trucks.


Like you said, lots of 47-53 Chevy pickups have eliminated those braces, apparently without consequences.

It's possible to reconfigure them with S-bends around components. Alternatively, you could relocate the mounting points on the fender so as to dodge interference.

Or it could be argued that the engine compartment looks cleaner without them and ditch them entirely. With that AME frame any body flex should be greatly reduced.


1951 Chevy Panel Truck

Moderated by  klhansen 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.033s Queries: 14 (0.030s) Memory: 0.6201 MB (Peak: 0.6912 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 09:07:06 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS