The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
6 members (Jon G, baldeagle, RLB, frogfarmer, ndkid275, Hush), 74 guests, and 2 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,087
Posts1,055,974
Members48,430
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
Hi, Not sure if this question belongs here or in The driveline forum... My truck has been in some kind of accident, there is a lot of bondo on the passenger cowl panel and some damage on the inside kick panel as well. The frame itself looks ok. I don’t see any obvious damage. I put it up jack stands and put a 4 foot level in front of the firewall across the frame. The frame does seem to slope 1/8 to 1/4 inch from driver to passenger side. My question is: how big of a deal is this? Should it be dead level? Or were these old trucks never that straight to begin with? I wouldn’t even know where to start if it needs to be straightened. Thank you


1950 Chevy 3100
Jason

1950 3100
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,054
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,054
Is the slope the same in the back, and in the same direction? If so, it's probably your floor that slopes. If there's a little twist in the frame, that could probably be taken out pretty easily, but 1/8 to 1/4 is barely enough to worry about IMO. They'll likely flex that much if you drive over a rock with one wheel.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
You know, that is a great point. I didn’t even think of putting a level on my garage floor. I’ll do that when I get home. I thought 1/4” didn’t sound like much but I’m glad to hear someone else say it. Thanks


1950 Chevy 3100
Jason

1950 3100
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,252
"Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!!
"Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,252
Or, at least put a level across the top of your jack stands. That will eliminate an uneven floor or sloppy jack stand manufacturing tolerances. Think of it as a mobile, poor man's jig table. Then measure frame level, measure diagonals, etc.

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
The floor is level, jack stands are level, very front and very back of frame rails are level. It’s just if I put the level just in front or behind the cab it slopes about an 1/8 to 1/4 from driver to passenger side....


1950 Chevy 3100
Jason

1950 3100
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,168
F
Fox Offline
A teacher, but always an apprentice.
A teacher, but always an apprentice.
F Offline
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,168
Isn’t that what shims are for? 😎

Last edited by Fox; 03/15/2019 2:06 AM.

1970 Chevrolet C10
Grandpa's -- My first truck -- In progress to shiny
Follow the build in the Project Journal
1950 Chevrolet 1-Ton Dually
"Ole Red Girl"
In the Stovebolt Gallery
More pictures here
1951 GMC 9430 1 ton dually--Shiny! | 1972 Chevrolet C20- Rusty- the puzzle box lid for the C10 | 1962 AMC Rambler American- my wife's
Parts trucks-
1951 GMC 9300 | 1951-GMC 9430 | 1951- Chevrolet 1300
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 678
M
'Bolter
'Bolter
M Offline
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 678
I wish mine sloped to the passenger side. Most Chevy trucks lean the other way due to years of driver weight. If you have one that slopes the other way count your blessings!


1951 Chevy Panel Truck
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
Ok. So you guys are saying I just need to put on a few pounds. Got it.


1950 Chevy 3100
Jason

1950 3100
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,122
4
'Bolter
'Bolter
4 Offline
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,122
Sounds to me like the springs might be the root cause of the slope?

Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,054
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Housekeeping (Moderator) Making a Stovebolt Bed & Paint and Body Shop Forums
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 11,054
Originally Posted by 49shep
The floor is level, jack stands are level, very front and very back of frame rails are level. It’s just if I put the level just in front or behind the cab it slopes about an 1/8 to 1/4 from driver to passenger side....
So it's not twisted. That's a good thing.
Originally Posted by miraclepieco
I wish mine sloped to the passenger side. Most Chevy trucks lean the other way due to years of driver weight. If you have one that slopes the other way count your blessings!
Brings to mind the Model A coupe that was originally owned by a guy named "Tiny" who sold it to a skinny guy. He swapped the transverse springs end for end, and it then leaned right by at least 4 inches. I bet it still leans right to this day. That was back in the mid 60's. grin
Originally Posted by 46Sparky
Sounds to me like the springs might be the root cause of the slope?
He had it on jack stands on the frame, so the springs would be out of the equation.


Kevin
1951 Chevy 3100 work truck
Follow this saga in Project Journal
Photos
1929 Ford pickup restored from the ground up. | 1929 Ford Special Coupe (First car)
Busting rust since the mid-60's
If you're smart enough to take it apart, you darn well better be smart enough to put it back together.
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 338
F
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
F Offline
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 338
The front and rear springs can affect the way the frame sits at rest. My 59 had a high rear passenger side, until the spring shop re-arced the front driver's side spring... then the entire truck sat perfectly level! Turns out that that spring set was pulling down...enough to lift the opposite corner. Hopefully my experience can help yours.


~~ Darcy

1959 GMC 9310 Canadian- built Shortbox Fleetside Deluxe
FootStomper
In the Stovebolt Gallery
In the Project Journals Forum
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,252
"Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!!
"Hey! I sound like Darth Vader!!
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,252
For the most part, the frame is flat from the radiator cross member to the rear end kick up. Especially on top of the rails. If there is any way you can site down the rail, you'll be able to see if there are any bows or twists in your rails.

Similar to sighting lumber. If you have never done that, this guy explains it a little better than me.

Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
The cab is still on the truck so it may be hard to sight the rail but I’ll give it a shot. I wonder what cause such a thing. Maybe to heavy a load in the bed at some point. I understand what frontstomper is saying, I plan on replacing the springs or going with IFS so I guess I’ll see if anything changes when I remove them. Thanks all


1950 Chevy 3100
Jason

1950 3100
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,983
Eye sighting may be very hard to do, and see, in the 1/8-1/4 range. There may be humps, rivets, metal overlap and all manor of features to interrupt sight, unlike a board. Getting your eye down there (with a level head wink ) is harder than standing and holding a board.

This point has been made by other posters already but here are my thoughts. 1/8 is in the area of level, on a truck that old. You may be thinking there is a "problem" that does not exists. The frame build tolerances, together with metal and rivet fatigue/stretch, would give 1/8 across 34" easily. How are you arriving at the 1/8-1/4 dimension? How are you measuring that? There could be some error with how you do it.

By the time you add the thickness tolerance stack, the fatigue and shrinkage of the hardware/pads that make up cab mounting, you could even be 1/8-1/4 in the opposite direction, regarding your results in checking cab for level. Your numbers, 1/8-1/4 are not abnormal even if you are exact. So my answer is no, you do not have a problem to worry about.

I have a laser level on a tripod that puts out a horizontal and vertical red line after the tripod is bubble leveled. I use that for all kinds of things around the house. This would be a good thing to use in your case if you want to be sure. The sagging springs is a good point. That has to be checked and/or taken out of the equation. (this is the point Mark made about putting frame on leveled jack stands)
A 20% coupon available in many fliers and magazines, makes this $44.
https://www.harborfreight.com/self-leveling-laser-level-kit-69243.html


Right is right, even if everyone is against it, and wrong is wrong, even if everyone is for it. - William Penn
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
5
'Bolter
'Bolter
5 Offline
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 167
Thank you. That’s what I was hoping to hear. It sounds like most people on here wouldn’t worry about that small of a difference. After I get it back from the sandblaster I will take a real close look at that rail and just make sure there are no cracks or weird things. Other than that I won’t spend much more time on it. Thanks for all the input.


1950 Chevy 3100
Jason

1950 3100
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,275
I would say that 1/8th to 1/4" would fall under the category of margin of error for manufacture and/or measuring method.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission

Moderated by  klhansen 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0