BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
1 members (Phak1),
559
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,270 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | 1958 GMC 1/2t truck , GMC 302 ,3 speed transmission
Looking at upgrading to EFI. Either Fitech or Holley.
Any advice-
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 | If the ignition current draw is high, use a relay. HEI works fine in my 302, use a relay for power.
Ed
Last edited by EdPruss; 12/29/2018 1:04 AM.
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,442 Bolter | Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,442 | EFI Ed not HEI. 
Martin '62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress) '47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project) ‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily) ‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence) “I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one! Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop! USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)
| | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | EFI- Electronic Fuel Injection
Last edited by dtwbcs; 12/29/2018 1:20 AM.
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | | | Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,214 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,214 | Anytime one can precisely control the fuel supplied to an ICE is an improvement. In this case your ROI may not be worth the effort as the head design will limit a throttle body EFI as it does a carb. Long intake runners with lots of bends into siamesed intake ports, low compression and a low redline combine as some of the limiting factors. That said you could possibly squeeze out a little more power & MPG and get a more dependable fuel delivery system which may make it worth while to you. Value is in the eye of the beholder, or something like that. Good luck Dave | | | | Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,674 Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) | Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer) Joined: Feb 2004 Posts: 28,674 | With a little tinkering and a huge amount of programming knowledge, you could use a dummy Rochester B as a throttle body and install an injector in each of the three intake ports, then trigger the injectors three times per crankshaft revolution. It would even be possible to install a second trigger device in a stock-appearing distributor to pulse each injector a fraction of a turn of the crankshaft before one of the intake valves open, for sequential port injection. Add a feedback circuit and an oxygen sensor, and you can fine-tune the mixture at whatever frequency the computer clock runs, usually either 10 or 90 hertz. The technology is out there, and has been for 30 years or so- - - -it's just a matter of adapting it to a 1920's design engine. Jerry
"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt! There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
| | | | Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 264 | Could it be done like the original throttle body mounted injectors? I may be way off here, but I thought our '84 Pontiac with the Quad 4 had a single injector mounted in a carb looking unit... to the naked eye seemed to spray a continuous mist down the throat. | | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 2,832 | I have a friend that has a throttle body injection on a 1950 Buick straight eight that works well. The Buick head is the same design as the six cylinder Chevy---lousy manifold design, crappy head design, and siamesed ports with the main difference being it has two more cylinders. I built him a computer controlled HEI distributor which ties into the injector controller and it worked much better than the separate systems. A PM will get you his name and phone number.
Evan
| | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | Any feedback on the Fitech. Can I use the original line from the tank to the inline fuel pump? Should I get the Command Center ?
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | | | Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 81 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2015 Posts: 81 | A few of the local car buffs are running the FiTech set ups on their "80's vintage GM rides. Every one of them is very happy with the units, super simple to install and set up. All are running the fuel command center as its way easier than the alternative. Of course those are all V8 engines that came with 4 barrel carbs which is what the FiTech is designed to replace. You'll need to drop off a few hundred dollars with Clifford performance for an intake to mount the FiTech to your 302. A few more to redo your exhaust and another couple for ancillary items such as manifold heat, air cleaner, gaskets...
Steve
Steve
1946 1/2 ton
| | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | Ok I already have a 12bolt.com modified Holley 4150 installed using a Clifford 4 barrel Intake , Clifford Headers. My GMC Nicson Headers just came in yesterday 
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | | | Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,214 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,214 | I've been doing a little reading on such a conversion on a V8. The basics would be the same for your 302. Edelbrock makes a conversion kit (Pro Flo 3 EFI) for a 4 bbl manifold. e). They also offer a downstream fuel sump that works with the high pressure fuel pump which alleviates the need for a return line. You do have to run an additional vent line which the article I read taps into the fuel filler neck. You'll have to drill and tap a couple ports in the intake and exhaust manifolds for sensors
Theres a pretty good article in the latest Classic Truck mag covering their adaption of EFI to a SBF.
Holley also makes a neat 4bbl to EFI conversion kit.
Both utilize self learning CPU's that can be customized to your liking.
Sounds like you've got the basics covered. Good luck Dave
| | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | Just received my Classic Truck magazine.Will read the article. 
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | | | Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,288 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,288 | I'm a FiTech fan. Replaced a new Carter 625 cfm carb (after repeated efforts to make an older Carter 625 and a AVS I had on the shelf work) with a 400 hp rated FiTech and it's GREAT. The vehicle (notice I didn't say car  ) is the V8 "rig" in my sig. Main issue I had to solve was fuel boiling in the carb due to the engine compartments high heat (small underhood area, full of V8) the ethanol contaminated gasoline caused fuel to boil at low speed. FI completely solved that problem. MPG improved and the seat of pants dyno says hp increase too. That along with instant starts and great idle to wot response with no hesitation makes it a win/win. On the return line, I used the original fuel line for the return and ran a new nickle copper fuel supply line. Easy. I really don't see any reason to spend the money or clutter up the engine compartment with FiTech's Commander (eliminates the need for return line) system. Good Luck reguardless of the system you use. RonR
Last edited by moparguy; 12/30/2018 12:45 AM.
1951 3600 with Clark flatbed, T5, 4.10 rear 1970 340 Duster 1990 5.0 V8 Miata (1990 Mustang Gt Drivetrain) 1964 CJ5
| | | | Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,442 Bolter | Bolter Joined: Apr 2005 Posts: 7,442 | Nope, you didn’t say “Car” but you did say Miata and the last I checked that wasn’t the name of a Chevy/gmc Truck! 
Martin '62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress) '47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project) ‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily) ‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence) “I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one! Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop! USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)
| | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | I'm a FiTech fan. Replaced a new Carter 625 cfm carb (after repeated efforts to make an older Carter 625 and a AVS I had on the shelf work) with a 400 hp rated FiTech and it's GREAT. The vehicle (notice I didn't say car  ) is the V8 Miata in my sig. Main issue I had to solve was fuel boiling in the carb due to the engine compartments high heat (small underhood area, full of V8) the ethanol contaminated gasoline caused fuel to boil at low speed. FI completely solved that problem. MPG improved and the seat of pants dyno says hp increase too. That along with instant starts and great idle to wot response with no hesitation makes it a win/win. On the return line, I used the original fuel line for the return and ran a new nickle copper fuel line supply line. Easy. I really don't see any reason to spend the money or clutter up the engine compartment with FiTech's Commander (eliminates the need for return line) system. Good Luck reguardless of the system you use. RonR Thanks 4 the feedback.
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 843 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 843 | Danny, The chevytalk forum has a section dedicated specifically to your issue: https://www.chevytalk.org/fusionbb/showforum.php?fid/35/keyword/Fuel_Injection/On chevytalk the "Chevy High Performance Topics" moderator, handle "Grumpyvette", answers questions with a brief summary statement and also links to a lot of published articles on whatever the subject is. It's a great forum for people who like to thoroughly investigate whatever they're working on at the moment. Here's a typical example of a Grumpy summary statement: "I run into so many guys that think you can just un-package new cylinder heads and slap them on any engine they build , and expect those heads to function flawlessly. there is almost always at least an extra 15-hp-20-hp or more potentially easily accessed through minor port clean-up. if your willing to disassemble the heads, port match the runners and clear up the casting flaws and smooth and contour the bowl area under the valves you could rather easily double or in some cases triple those potential power gains just by improving the port contours and removing casting flaws." It is followed by a long list of links to further explain the concept. His stuff is great reading for people who really want to understand what's going on inside an engine and how to make improvements.
Last edited by yar; 12/30/2018 12:06 AM.
Ray
| | | | Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,288 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,288 |
Last edited by moparguy; 12/30/2018 3:37 PM.
1951 3600 with Clark flatbed, T5, 4.10 rear 1970 340 Duster 1990 5.0 V8 Miata (1990 Mustang Gt Drivetrain) 1964 CJ5
| | | | Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2008 Posts: 643 | Danny, The chevytalk forum has a section dedicated specifically to your issue: https://www.chevytalk.org/fusionbb/showforum.php?fid/35/keyword/Fuel_Injection/On chevytalk the "Chevy High Performance Topics" moderator, handle "Grumpyvette", answers questions with a brief summary statement and also links to a lot of published articles on whatever the subject is. It's a great forum for people who like to thoroughly investigate whatever they're working on at the moment. Here's a typical example of a Grumpy summary statement: "I run into so many guys that think you can just un-package new cylinder heads and slap them on any engine they build , and expect those heads to function flawlessly. there is almost always at least an extra 15-hp-20-hp or more potentially easily accessed through minor port clean-up. if your willing to disassemble the heads, port match the runners and clear up the casting flaws and smooth and contour the bowl area under the valves you could rather easily double or in some cases triple those potential power gains just by improving the port contours and removing casting flaws." It is followed by a long list of links to further explain the concept. His stuff is great reading for people who really want to understand what's going on inside an engine and how to make improvements. Ray , Thanks I didn't think to check there although I am a member
Danny 1958 GMC stepside GMC 302 six cylinder 3 speed OD trans
| | |
| |