The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
3 members (DaveV, Flatlander, VEW), 557 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,777
Posts1,039,270
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
3/4 ton AD trucks have steering arms with tapered holes and the stock ball studs are also tapered bolted affairs. This makes the aftermarket tie rod "modern" ends non-usable since they have straight studs too loose in the tapered holes. Does anyone know if there is a compatible version for 3/4 ton trucks or another end which will fit and is usable when replacing the old ball stud/sloppy socket types? :confused:

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
J
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
I've got a 53 3/4 ton. I got mine from Chevs of the 40s, but I think most of the major vendors carry them.


Jeff Nelson

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." - Mark Twain
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
R
Junior Member
Junior Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
I got replacement "modern style" tie rod ends for my '51 3/4 ton from LMC, lmctrucks.com.


1951 Chevy 3600, 1996 Yukon, 2000 Road King
It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you.
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery.htm
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,878
W
'Bolter
'Bolter
W Offline
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 1,878
Are the "modern" tie-rod ends bigger and bulkier than the original? My tie-rod ends barely clear my wheels.

Thanks!!


1948 3/4-Ton 5-Window Flatbed Chevrolet

33 Years. Now with a '61 261, 848 head, Rochester Monojet carb, SM420 4-speed, 4.10 rear, dual reservoir MC, Bendix up front, 235/85R16 tires, 12-volt w/alternator, electric wipers and a modern radio in the glove box.
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
J
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
My understanding (limited as it is) is that the "modern" tie rod ends are actually a little smaller than the original, allowing more clearance with the wheels. I could be totally wrong, this is just what I have heard.


Jeff Nelson

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." - Mark Twain
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
I can only speak about the 1/2 ton version, and they are about 1/4 inch shorter beyond the stud center plus are rounded rather than a square end. They would provide a little improvement.
Is everyone sure the replacements have the tapered stud to match the hole in the steering arm? I'll be trying to track these down soon. Thanks.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 34
P
Member
Member
P Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 34
I'm pretty sure that one ton and 3/4 ton are the same. I just replaced the tie rod ends on my 1 ton panel and the ones I got from Carter's fit perfectly.

Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
The stock 1/2 & 3/4 ton tie rod pn #367528 (43 5/16" x 3/4") has male threads on the ends. The replacement "modern" ends have an integral straight stud, which fits great in the 1/2 ton steering arms (after the old ball stud is removed from the arm). The problem is with the 3/4 ton arms. They have a "bolted" ball stud which fits into a tapered hole larger than the 1/2 tons (added strength?). The replacement ends are too loose in these holes to work.
I think the one ton tie rod is different, and the ends have male threads to connect to it. Perhaps the one ton rod could be substituted for the 3/4 ton rod. Anyone tried this? wink

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
J
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
Splash,
The 'modern' tie rod ends that I ordered from Chevs of the 40s for my 3/4 ton (about 6 months ago) had a tapered and threaded ball stud that fit in the steering arm holes perfectly. Have you called and spoken to any of the vendors?


Jeff Nelson

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." - Mark Twain
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
Jeff, I was trying to get away from the ball stud attached to the steering arm and go to the type like what is available for the 1/2 tons, with an integral stud on the end. That is where the confusion is. From what I can gather the "modern" type is not out there for a 3/4 ton truck.

Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
J
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
Splash,
Sorry to beat this into the ground, but I guess I'm still confused. I scanned in the picture of the "modern" tie rod ends from the most recent LMC catalog (aside: this catalog is well worth the few bucks, just for the pictures).

[img]http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~chevy53/images/tierod.gif[/img]

Is this what you are referring to? If so, you will notice from the drawing that the stud is tapered and threaded. Also notice that LMC (and Chevs of the 40s in their newest catalog) list this item as working on both the 1/2 ton and 3/4 ton. This is the exact part I purchased last fall and it works great on my 53 3/4 ton.


Jeff Nelson

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." - Mark Twain
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
Thanks Jeff! I had both LMC and Chev's of 40's catalogs, but they were old ones, plus looked at the web site at Chev's of 40's and did not see 'em called out for 3/4 tons. That is exactly what I am looking for. grin

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
R
Junior Member
Junior Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
Jeff, Thanks for clarifying this tie rod issue.
One more tip, I used a fork type tie rod end separator tool I found at Discount Auto Parts ($12.00) along with an open end wrench to take up some slop and had no trouble removing the old tie rod ends studs from the steering arms.


1951 Chevy 3600, 1996 Yukon, 2000 Road King
It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you.
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery.htm
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
J
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
J Offline
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 454
Well, now here's a dumb question. In the LMC drawing above, the tie rod end goes into the steering arm from the bottom. On my 1953 3600 the taper in the steering arm hole goes from wide at the top to narrow at the bottm and the tie rod end could only go in from the top. The drawing in the shop manual seems to indicate the same thing. Are the 1/2 and 3/4 ton different in this respect? That is, do the tie rod ends on the 1/2 tons go in from the bottom and the 3/4 ton go in from the top?


Jeff Nelson

"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy." - Benjamin Franklin
"Always do right. This will gratify some people and astonish the rest." - Mark Twain
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
R
Junior Member
Junior Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
As far as I can remember the new tie rods ends went in just like the diagram you submitted, I'm at work right now and can't run out and look under the truck. Also My truck is a 51.


1951 Chevy 3600, 1996 Yukon, 2000 Road King
It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you.
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery.htm
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
I think the tie rod should be on top of the arms as with the original ball stud arms setup. I think the drawing is incorrect in that respect. Let's chew this around and be sure though! wink

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 255
O
Member
Member
O Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 255
I just ran outside and looked at my 48 - 3/4 ton and my tie rod is above the ball joint, opposite from the diagram.
Ralph


rtlopez@shipleysystems.com
48 Chevy 3600 w/235
48 Chevy 3100 w/235:
You cant see the smoke on a dirt road.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
S
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
S Offline
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 379
I've viewed those drawings in the LMC catalogs as useful for picking out the part you are seeking, but not necessarily accurate for the actual installation. Trying to confirm that a part listed a vendors catalog can be very frustrating and time consuming, however. The drawings are useful for that and a real time saver sometimes.
I have the '29-'54 Master Parts Catalog on a cd I bought ($10 off ebay) and it is also at the Manuals Online website which is a really great service. You 'bolters are also a huge help! wink

Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
R
Junior Member
Junior Member
R Offline
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 32
eek I stand corrected, I just looked under my truck and the tie rod is on top, so the studs with tapered shaft go into the steering arm from the top.


1951 Chevy 3600, 1996 Yukon, 2000 Road King
It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you.
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery.htm
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
4
Extreme Gabster
Extreme Gabster
4 Offline
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,458
Many modern vehicles have them coming in from the bottom so that if the nut is too tight on the threads you can put a jack on the bottom of the tie rod end to keep it from spinning when you assemble it or take it off.


Paint & Body Shop moderator
A lone amateur built the Ark. A large group of professionals built the Titanic.

Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.072s Queries: 13 (0.054s) Memory: 0.6824 MB (Peak: 0.8027 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 11:45:23 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS