The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
4 members (Hotrod Lincoln, MNSmith, DadsFirstPickup, TexasA&M48Truck), 85 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,091
Posts1,056,035
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
I pulled the front shocks off the 46, I think they've been on since new. They are the dual action type. There was no resistance moving the arm in either direction. I remove the plug and got only a few drops of oil out. Have slowly re-filled them with hydraulic oil, working the arm, resting, re-filling until they appear full. There is certainly resistance now, but not uniform through the entire range of motion. The arm moves, then seems to hit a tight spot, then with more force moves again.
My question is with a properly functioning knee action shock should you expect smooth resistance in both directions like a modern tube shock or are the knee action shocks somewhat different?

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,792
H
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
Kettle Custodian (pot stirrer)
H Online: Content
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29,792
First, they probably aren't "dual action". Most lever shocks work only on rebound, not compression. Second, "knee action" was a self-contained suspension system that was used on cars in the late 1930's, never on trucks. It was not very successful, and was discontinued pretty quickly. A lever-type shock should have very little restriction as the spring compresses, and a fairly stiff resistance as the spring rebounds. It sounds like your shocks have lost their fluid, probably due to bushing wear and/or worn seals.

http://theoldmotor.com/?p=159035

Jerry



"It is better to be silent and be thought a fool than to speak and eliminate all doubt!" - Abraham Lincoln
Cringe and wail in fear, Eloi- - - - -we Morlocks are on the hunt!
There is nothing noble in being superior to your fellow man; true nobility is being superior to your former self. - Ernest Hemingway
Love your enemies and drive 'em nuts!
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,377
T
Ex Hall Monitor
Ex Hall Monitor
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,377
It seems trucks could be ordered with dual action shocks in '46. Stock shocks were single action. For clarity there is a difference between lever action and knee action. Jerry is correct that Chevy cars had Dubonet (also called Knee Action) shocks in the '30s on some cars. In '38 they were standard on the Master Deluxe with single action lever action shocks standard on the Master. Many people use the terms interchangeably but that's not accurate and can cause confusion. Imagine telling a vendor you want xxxxx parts for knee action shocks and when they arrive they don't fit anything on your lever action shocks. Not criticizing, just informing. You are far from the first to use the term and won't be the last.


Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet.
The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion.
Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
S
Wrench Fetcher
Wrench Fetcher
S Offline
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 28
Update to my original post. Firstly they are single not dual action. So I pulled off the front, they were nearly dry with no resistance in either direction. Filled them with hydraulic oil and they recovered very well, free travel upwards and stiff resistance in the rebound direction. So excited, this has been my truck since the age of 15, some 46 years now. Thinking these shocks were likely not functioning all these years, I expected to feel the difference on my first bumpy road test. But, to my disappointment, any difference was almost unnoticeable. Did these shocks ever make a difference when new?

Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,377
T
Ex Hall Monitor
Ex Hall Monitor
T Offline
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,377
There is some benefit but as you see not a lot. That's why manufacturers eventually went from friction shocks to single action lever shocks to double action, to tube shocks and on from there. I had a nasty wheel hop on my '38. Overhauling the stock lever action shocks didn't solve it so I ended up putting tube shocks on the front and that solved the wheel hop.


Save a life, adopt a senior shelter pet.
The three main causes of blindness: Cataracts, Politics, Religion.
Name your dog Naked so you can walk Naked in the park.
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 315
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 315
The single action shocks, (all have been rebuilt by Apple Hydraulics) that I have on my 36 have made huge difference in the ride.


1936 GMC T-14 1/2-Ton Pickup
In the Stovebolt Gallery
In the Gallery Forum

Moderated by  Gdads51 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0