BUSY BOLTERS Are you one? The Shop Area
continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.
| | Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| |
1 members (Movingeric),
487
guests, and
1
robot. | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | Forums66 Topics126,777 Posts1,039,270 Members48,100 | Most Online2,175 Jul 21st, 2025 | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 | So I have a ‘59 235ci that I plan on putting a T-5 behind. I calculated a 3.73 gear ratio into a RPM equation and ended up finding an cruising rpm of approximately 2300. Now that’s with an overdrive of .68 from what I found looking up T-5 transmissions. I’m sure they have other OD gear ratios, but that’s the one that I found.
What gear ratio came with ‘59 3200?
What gear ratios are possible in ‘59 3200?
What make/model rear end will transplant easily, or with minimal modification, that has 3.73 gear ratio?
I have searched the forum but can’t seem to choose the correct keywords to find what I’m looking for. I know it’s mentioned a lot here, just looking for the right post or suggestions if you have them.
Thank you.
Last edited by Los59; 02/27/2018 1:28 PM.
"Start living your dream now no matter what the sacrifice, and everything else will fall into place."
| | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 Bubba - Curmudgeon | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,262 | 1959 rear axle information is not available online, but, here is 1958 information. | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 | Thanks guys. So if the stock rear gear, at the lowest is 3.90, I should "theoretically" have a decent cruising rpm with overdrive?
This is the equation im using to determine cruising RPM. MPH x Gear Ratio x OD x 336/Tire Diameter So....75MPH x 3.90 x .68 x 336 / 29 = 2304 RPM (3.73 gear was a little better obviously, but im not gonna be that picky) Of cousre, I havent taken into consideration vehicle weight so thats may be variable to take into account.
Bartamos I found an '87 rear diff with 3.73, did you have to move leaf spring saddle to fit on yours?
"Start living your dream now no matter what the sacrifice, and everything else will fall into place."
| | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,988 Sir Searchalot | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,988 | As far as I remember, I used the donor springs and did weld a new perch and shock mount (shown). I also used the donor shackles and hangers and did a shackle flip, but I was doing 4x4 under it. (That's a whole 'nuther post). You just need to take off the old and start mocking up the donor to plan your attack. I personally would not use and old 3.90 rear end. Why are you doing a T5 and all this for a 235 motor? Are you looking mostly for mileage/gas savings? Don't get all wound up on gas mileage. If you are wanting mostly cruise speeds like 65 MPH or higher, a 3.90 is not for you. If you like shifting a bunch with a 235 6 cylinder, that's fine but did you ever consider a 700r4? or other AOD? | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 | I honestly just love the nostalgia of a straight six and a stick shift for this truck. I’m going to set this up to be driver friendly such as disc brakes, power steering etc. Not really worried about gas mileage.
Well, if the rear gear ends up being 3.70 should I be ok? Or are the old school components not made for those speeds? I may consider an automatic in the future.
"Start living your dream now no matter what the sacrifice, and everything else will fall into place."
| | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,988 Sir Searchalot | Sir Searchalot Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,988 | Nostalgia would an SM420. | | | | Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 436 'Bolter | 'Bolter Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 436 | And the SM420 is a tried and true, bulletproof transmission. Used on everything from 1/2 ton to 2 1/2 ton trucks up to and including 1967. | | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 | The overdrive T5 ratios I've found are .63, .72, .73, .76, .86. So If you have a .63 od at 60 mpr with 28" tires and 3:73 rear your rpm would be 1834. 4th gear rpm would be 2925. Little high wouldn't you say. However for flat land Texas maybe ok. I'd be looking for a .72 od, that would give you 2106 rpm in 5th with little or no downshifting with the short hills in Texas.
"Drugs are money, money is power, power is security." - Kent Heiner Nedrow population 2212 Carbon footprint family of 2/11 tonnes of CO2/yr
| | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 Renaissance Man | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,059 | With a 235/T-5 in a '59 truck, you will want the 3.73 or higher ratio (numerically). A 3.90 or even a 4.10 would suit that combo well with a .73 overdrive. The reason is the lack of horsepower of the 235 compared to a V8. The beauty of the T-5 behind a 235 is the extra and closer together shifts of the 5 speed, and the overdrive to keep it from screaming on the highway. Every time you shift, you will be within the optimal power band of the 235. No screaming before a shift, and no lugging after the shift. 70 MPH no problem. If GM had come out with a T-5 in 1947, there would be no such thing as a car or truck made by any other manufacturer.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 | That's right, with either o.d., the .63, .72 or .73 the 4th gear rpm is the same ( 2925) given the parameters I laid out above. The only difference is the O.D; The .63 would be 1843. .72 would be 2106. .73 would be 2135. .76 would be 2223. .86 would be 2515. PIck your poison and where you live.
"Drugs are money, money is power, power is security." - Kent Heiner Nedrow population 2212 Carbon footprint family of 2/11 tonnes of CO2/yr
| | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 | Thanks for all the feed back guys, I really appreciate it. I live in Conroe, Tx so not too many hills around me.
"Start living your dream now no matter what the sacrifice, and everything else will fall into place."
| | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 . | . Joined: May 2005 Posts: 8,877 | I'd be cautious of the very fast overdrive ratios, you may find the rpm drop between 4th and OD is a bit much. If the difference between the gears is to much you end up winding it out further in 4th than desired. Or when down shifting from OD back to 4th to pull a hill you (choose to) loose road speed because RPM in 4th is then higher than desirable. Depending on the application even 0.73 can feel like a stretch.
Try driving a similarly equipped truck if you can before picking a very fast OD ratio.
In my experience 0.8 OD ratio (or less) is very comfortable, you can run along in direct or OD at the same road speed without extremes of RPM in either gear. Nice for hills because its comfortable to run either gear as needed. You don't always get your pick of OD ratios if axle gear choices are limited, sometimes you need more OD just to get the final numbers to work, then getting between 4th and OD is a compromise. | | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 | I hate even to suggest this. You might be better off with a Saginaw 4 speed with the correct 1st gear and forgetting the T5. Then drive it within the comfortable rpm range you are familiar with. After all it's not a race car.
Last edited by 52pu; 03/05/2018 10:26 PM.
"Drugs are money, money is power, power is security." - Kent Heiner Nedrow population 2212 Carbon footprint family of 2/11 tonnes of CO2/yr
| | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 | I'd be cautious of the very fast overdrive ratios, you may find the rpm drop between 4th and OD is a bit much. If the difference between the gears is to much you end up winding it out further in 4th than desired. Or when down shifting from OD back to 4th to pull a hill you (choose to) loose road speed because RPM in 4th is then higher than desirable. Depending on the application even 0.73 can feel like a stretch. Being this is my first project I'm sure there wil be a lot of trial and error. I wont really know until I have all the details ironed out. I need to figure out what my rear gear ratio is first to see if its something I may use. The transmission I have is a 3 speed. I appreciate all the perspectives and suggestions. I glad to see that there are many options.
"Start living your dream now no matter what the sacrifice, and everything else will fall into place."
| | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 Wrench Fetcher | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 32 | I hate even to suggest this. You might be better off with a Saginaw 4 speed with the correct 1st gear and forgetting the T5. Then drive it within the comfortable rpm range you are familiar with. After all it's not a race car. I thought of this option as well, not sure what my cruising RPM would be at highway speeds though. I'm guessing 4th gear is 1:1 just like the the 3-speed. If im going to purchase another trans though, I might as well get one that many have suggested and used in the past.
"Start living your dream now no matter what the sacrifice, and everything else will fall into place."
| | | | Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 Shop Shark | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2000 Posts: 506 | 4th gear is 1:1 as you say with a 3 or 4 speed. At 60 mpr with 27" tall tires and 3:73 your rpm will be 3,033. Bit high anywhere. WIth 29+1/2" tires the rpm would be 2824. If it were mine, and I would not be off road driving pick a rear gear that would get the rpm down between 2200-2500 in high gear. WIth 27" tires that would be 3:08 or 3:23.
"Drugs are money, money is power, power is security." - Kent Heiner Nedrow population 2212 Carbon footprint family of 2/11 tonnes of CO2/yr
| | |
| |