The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 158 guests, and 3 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,091
Posts1,056,387
Members48,442
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 147
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 147
Looking for advice....again. This forum is awesome I don't know where I would be without it. Many thanks to everyone.

Anyways, I have a 1950 3100 and will be installing a 1957 261 engine. I will be changing out the stock rear end to a 2nd gen camaro for improved cruising speeds but was wondering which transmission would be the best selection? Would the 1958 apache trans get the improvement I'm looking for and is it easier to install to the engines or do I really need the T5?



1950 Chevrolet 1/2-Ton 3100
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,063
Big Bolt Forum Moderator
Big Bolt Forum Moderator
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,063
bumping up the rear to more freeway gears will give you increased top end with your 58 Apache trans (assuming it is the SM420). You need to do the math with the new gear ratio and tire diameter and figure out your rpm at cruising speed. You also need to figure out how you are going to use your truck. Your T5 may be a bit faster shifting since the internals are a bit smaller and lighter but, the SM420 is a workhorse, used in 1/2 ton up through 2-ton trucks. The T5 will probably have more evenly spaced gears, (SM420 has a big jump between 3rd and 4th).

My vote is the SM420 but, since that is what I run, I may be a bit biased!


Mike
1955 Chevy 6400 ex-flatbed (no bed now!) sold September 2023
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1958 Chevy 6400 flatbed W/dump
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1959 Chevy Suburban Owned for almost 20 years, Daily Driver -- sold May 2016
In the Stovebolt Gallery

Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
I have a 59 3100 with a 261. I replaced the original 3 speed with a world class T-5 from a Camaro. Only modification to the trans was to enlarge the 4 mounting bolt holes to 1/2 inch. Changed the clutch disc to match the splines on the output shaft. It made a world of difference when driving on the highway, lowered the rpm's about 1,000 rpm's at 60 mph. I have the original 3:90 rear end in the truck.


Tommy
59 apache 1/2t
261 short stepside
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,441
Bolter
Bolter
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 7,441
Smoother less sloppy shifting with the T5. Fuel mileage may improve and driveability might also improve with the T5. If you want period correct then the SM420 will have to do. drive


Martin
'62 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed (Restomod in progress)
'47 Chevy 3100 5 Window (long term project)
‘65 Chevy Biscayne (Emily)
‘39 Dodge Business Coupe (Clarence)
“I fought the law and the law won" now I are a retired one!
Support those brave men/women who stand the "Thin Blue Line"! Hug a cop!
USAF 1965-1969 Weather Observation Tech (I got paid to look at the clouds)

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 124
G
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
G Offline
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 124
I would guess that the T5 would make it seem like a modern truck with 5 gears. It would be nice and easy to shift. I have a sm420 in my '59 and most women and kids can't even drive it. I like it. I like winding it out in third and I like the granny gear. I really like the super low reverse. The T5 would definitely be an upgrade but so would a new Silverado. I guess I just like the old everything. I bet that didn't help you a bit.
Ps. If your original transmission is a three speed, almost anything would be a tremendous upgrade!

Last edited by GeneWiseman; 11/22/2017 2:41 PM.

Gene
1959 Apache
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
I installed a T5 with a tall shifter handle and short-throw spacer. I've only driven it around the neighborhood (below 45mph). I really like it so far. It was an easy conversion.

Not having been on the freeway yet, I have begun to ponder whether this 4 leaf spring truck should really be given the gears to go faster than the manufacture ever intended..... I have yet to experience what it will be like at say, 80 mph (the flow of commute traffic in the first 2 lanes where I live!). Will it be a handful?


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 147
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 147
Tommy, I have read where a T5 from anything other than an S10 truck will have issues with clearing the bench seat. How well did the Camaro T5 fit. Because of this I have limited my search to S10 trucks and its been difficult to locate ones with mechanical speedometer. The closest I have found so far is a T5 for a 4x4 but it has a torsion box that I dont need and I have no idea if it would have fitting issues.

Genewiseman, Thanks for the info about explaining the ease of use between the two trannies. I have promised my daughter she could drive it sometimes......still cant believe I agreed to that, but it needs to be relatively easy to operate.

Norcal Dave, Can you tell me what type of vehicle your T5 came out of?



Thanks everyone for the information! I think i have been convinced to go for a T5.


1950 Chevrolet 1/2-Ton 3100
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,063
Big Bolt Forum Moderator
Big Bolt Forum Moderator
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 2,063
I am not sure what is so hard about driving an SM420. My wife drove the one in our 59 Suburban for 20 years with no issues. I had a 79 Blazer rear in it with 3.40 gears, (also changed out front end, added power disc brakes , and different leaf springs) and I could cruise at 90mph all day long with no issues. True, an OD may be nice to drop rpm at that speed and maybe pick up some gas mileage but, again, it depends on how you are going to use the truck!

Dongray, I would see if there is someone close to you that has a truck with an SM420 in it that will let you drive it. You may find that it is not a big deal and you like the granny gear!


Mike
1955 Chevy 6400 ex-flatbed (no bed now!) sold September 2023
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1958 Chevy 6400 flatbed W/dump
In the Stovebolt Gallery
1959 Chevy Suburban Owned for almost 20 years, Daily Driver -- sold May 2016
In the Stovebolt Gallery

Sufficient unto the day is the evil thereof
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 436
6
'Bolter
'Bolter
6 Offline
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 436
I have a '62 C10 with a 327, SM420, and a stock 3rd member 3.90:1 rear end.

I have no trouble running down the freeway at 65-70mph all day long, with occasional bursts of 75-80mph. Both my wife and daughter can drive and shift the SM420. Granted, it is easier for me, but I have a lot more experience with it.

My wife used to drive a Chevette with a 4 speed, so she has experience with a manual, but it's been a while. My daughter learned to drive in the '62, but prefers her Harley.

If you plan to use your truck as "a truck", then keep the SM420, it's bullet proof. If you plan to use it as a freeway driver, then I would consider upgrading.

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
Dongray,
I specialize in T5 transmissions. I like to help folks figure out how to get them working in older Chevy trucks.
Your dilemma is a good one. I have a few bits of advice. The advice given so far is good stuff.

1. Figure out what rear axle gear you have. (The 2nd generation Camaro rear if you have settled on that).
2. Use THIS RPM CALCULATOR to figure out what RPMs will be for 65 MPH. You'll need to know the rear tire diameter. Use 0.73 for the transmission ratio because that's a common T5 OD gear.
3. If your Camaro rear axle gear is higher than 3.42 (lower numerically) then a 0.73 OD gear will not work very well. You'd probably be happier with the SM420.

Multiple factors need to be considered before deciding to use a T5. A T5 from 1992 and earlier will bolt right up to a bell housing with a Muncie bolt pattern. The 1993 and earlier S10 T5 has a Muncie bolt pattern as does the 1992 and earlier Camaro T5. Later model T5 trannys have a FORD case pattern.
As you are aware, the S10 T5 with a cable speedometer connection is very hard to find these days. I used to find one or two a year but not any more. So if you want a working cable driven speedometer on your dash, the SM420 is the easier answer.

First things first . . . . what is the rear axle gear in the Camaro rear?

Last edited by Lugnutz; 11/23/2017 2:00 AM.
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Don, my T5 came out of an S-10 and has a mechanical speedo drive.


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Mike, yeah I think that swapping in a different front end is probably a good idea if you intend to go faster...I have the stock front suspension.


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 147
D
'Bolter
'Bolter
D Offline
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 147
Lugnutz,
I reviewed your T5 transmission page and immediately book marked it. It is a treasure trove of information thanks for putting it together. In regards to the rear end the one I am currently looking at is a 3.73 from a 78 Camaro. Im not too sure about tire size as of yet and tend to like between 26 to 29 in. dia.


I found a 1985 S10 T5 with mechanical speedo and a 0.73 ratio on craigslist and they are wanting 700! Sounds pricey to me and I wouldnt be able to inspect it since it is several states away. It seems that the T5 with electric speedo can be found for around 300. If I have to spend that much for one with a mechanical speedo I could buy a newer model and the digital converter for the same price. Thoughts?

I have to admit I had no idea how much each component, rear end, trans, and tire diameter were so intertwined in making this decision. I have to thank everyone for educating me on this.


1950 Chevrolet 1/2-Ton 3100
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
Dongray,

I forgot about that,sorry. Yes the camaro transmission has the shifter at the rear of the tail shaft housing, the S10 is at the front. I did swap the housing to move the shifter wasn't hard to do.The trans I used I believe was a 1992 v8 version ,so the input shaft did Not need to be shortened.It is an electric speedometer ,but I just use a gps to see how fast I'm going.


Tommy
59 apache 1/2t
261 short stepside

Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0