The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Help is a click away!

VEHICLE
INFORMATION
KITS


at the

GM Heritage Center
All the details are here.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
5 members (Hush, Maybellene, klhansen, Otto Skorzeny, lumbersawyer), 89 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics128,092
Posts1,056,040
Members48,433
Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Brad Allen's photos

AD Chevy Trucks

Pictures galore
Over 6,000 pictures

Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips.

Check them out!

Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!

Big Thanks!

THANKS!

For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for

over 30 years!

and not clogged down
with Ads!


Again, thanks!

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#1235874 09/21/2017 8:00 PM
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
E
'Bolter
'Bolter
E Offline
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 20
Hi Fellas,
I have a 1962 C10 pickup with a 235 Inline, 3 on the tree. Can I swap to a T5 or even a 4 speed saganaw? Because the rear motor mounts are incorporated into the bell housing, the T5 isn't bolting to the bell housing as I thought it would.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Ed

Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
Ed,
Your 1962 C10 bell should have a hydraulic clutch slave and fork on the PS of the bell. None of that needs to change with a T5.
THIS LINK is from my BLOG and should help (but your T5 might have 10 or 14 splines instead of 26 splines like mine.).

Ed Lupardo #1235940 09/22/2017 10:58 AM
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
T
'Bolter
'Bolter
T Offline
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 1,094
Depending on what your t5 came out of, it may have a Ford bolt pattern where it mounts to the bell housing. Is that the problem you're having?


Tommy
59 apache 1/2t
261 short stepside
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
These are not always a direct swap... spacer plate is required between beck housing and tranny, and sometimes you must shorten the input shaft a tiny bit.

Last edited by Norcal Dave; 09/23/2017 5:16 AM.

~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Norcal Dave #1236020 09/22/2017 11:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
Originally Posted by Norcal Dave
These are not always a direct swap... spacer plate is required between beck housing and tranny, and sometimes you must shorted the input shaft a tiny bit.

Norcal Dave,
The need for a spacer plate can be eliminated. Simply replace the 14 spline input shaft with a Jeep T5 shaft. That swap does 3 amazing things.
1. It eliminates the need for a spacer plate
2. It allows you to continue using a factory 10 spline clutch kit
3. The Jeep shaft is stronger than the S10 shaft

The spacer plates cost about $160. The cost of a Jeep shaft is around $80.
Here is a LINK from my website showing the details of the Jeep shaft swap.

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
I had no idea. Thanks for the link. I really don't like the idea of a spacer plate in there anyway- the whole assembly is long enough as it is. Great instructions you made too!


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Ed Lupardo #1236146 09/24/2017 12:54 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,278
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,278
When I was mocking up a T-5 from an s10 behind my '53 235, I had a binding issue. I didn't feel like grinding longer grooves in the input shaft, nor did I want to spring for the aluminum spacer and have to wait for delivery (too lazy, cheap, and impatient).
I ended up making my own spacer out of plate steel. I used a bell housing to trace out where to cut with a cutting torch.
A spacer plate is nothing more than a simple spacer that has all of the metal which would interfere with moving parts removed. It is not rocket surgery.
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
52Carl,
You are correct! There are many ways to make it work. Some folks even prefer to grind out a little bit of the 14 splines in the clutch disc hub to prevent the binding you mention. That works too.
There's a vendor on eBay that sells a metal plate. I think it's less than 1/8" thick. He claims his plate does the trick and makes it work. It should. However, sourcing the CORRECT 14 spline clutch disc becomes the issue. Rockauto and Speedway Motors sell 14 spline clutch discs but which disc will work for this or that pressure plate is hard to say. It's trial and error that way because of the differences.
I vote for the Jeep shaft swap mainly because there are fewer parts to keep track of. Plus I think it's a good idea to inspect the inside of the tranny before putting a T5 into service, so you are already 90% done with the Jeep shaft swap during the inspection.

Last edited by Lugnutz; 09/24/2017 2:57 PM.
Lugnutz #1236290 09/25/2017 4:06 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,278
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,278
Originally Posted by Lugnutz
52Carl,
You are correct! There are many ways to make it work. Some folks even prefer to grind out a little bit of the 14 splines in the clutch disc hub to prevent the binding you mention. That works too.
There's a vendor on eBay that sells a metal plate. I think it's less than 1/8" thick. He claims his plate does the trick and makes it work. It should. However, sourcing the CORRECT 14 spline clutch disc becomes the issue. Rockauto and Speedway Motors sell 14 spline clutch discs but which disc will work for this or that pressure plate is hard to say. It's trial and error that way because of the differences.
I vote for the Jeep shaft swap mainly because there are fewer parts to keep track of. Plus I think it's a good idea to inspect the inside of the tranny before putting a T5 into service, so you are already 90% done with the Jeep shaft swap during the inspection.
When you say "You are correct", I assume that you are referring to the "too lazy, cheap, and impatient" part. smile
If I ever do another T-5, I will look for a Jeep shaft.
I must say this again. Without Lugnutz, I never would have known about, nor attempted to do the awesome T-5 swap.
Thanks again!
Carl


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
52Carl #1236436 09/26/2017 1:51 AM
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
L
'Bolter
'Bolter
L Offline
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,951
Originally Posted by 52Carl
When you say "You are correct", I assume that you are referring to the "too lazy, cheap, and impatient" part. smile
Carl

Good one!



Moderated by  Dusty53, SWEET 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0