The Stovebolt.com Forums Home | Tech Tips | Gallery | FAQ | Events | Features | Search
Fixing the old truck

BUSY BOLTERS
Are you one?

Where is it?? The Shop Area

continues to pull in the most views on the Stovebolt. In August alone there were over 22,000 views in those 13 forums.

Searching the Site - a click away
click here to search
New here ??? Where to start?
Click on image for the lowdown. Where do I go around here?
====
Who's Online Now
8 members (Guitplayer, Possum, cmayna, Joe W, UtahYork, Greg_H, FAST55, rfs56trk), 522 guests, and 1 robot.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums66
Topics126,776
Posts1,039,271
Members48,100
Most Online2,175
Jul 21st, 2025
Step-by-step instructions for pictures in the forums
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
I'm going to be re-installing my fuel tank with a new sending unit and fuel lines and am wondering what I should use to seal the screws that hold the sending unit in, the sending unit gasket, and whether I should use anything on the threads at the bottom of the tank where the valve screws on. I was thinking of using teflon tape on any threads. I don't want to have to do this twice!

Any help appreciated. Thanks.


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 250
E
'Bolter
'Bolter
E Offline
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 250
Dave, people here will tell you to be leery of using teflon tape on the threads for fear of pieces coming off and clogging your pump. I found a Permatex product that can be used with threaded fuel fittings and used it successfully when installing the brass fitting at the tank.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 843
Y
yar Offline
Shop Shark
Shop Shark
Y Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 843
Dave, I've had a good outcome using Gasgacinch on the screws and cork gasket of the sender and teflon tape on pipe threads. To keep teflon tape from getting into the fuel system a couple of bare threads can be left on the small end of the male part so that the teflon won't be cut by the threads and fall into the tank.

My '71 Dodge van has a later year 36 gallon tank on it and the sender is located on the front of the tank, not the top. That's the true test of whether there are leaks. Cork is a low tech gasket material but it sure seems to work in that application. Cork also works great on steel sandwich valve cover gaskets and intake manifold front and back ends that seal against V8 blocks. Good stuff!

There is also a Permatex anaerobic sealer that is not designed for gasoline applications but works perfectly in that application. I used it on the float bowl cover paper gasket on my '36 Chevy pickup that was a chronic leaker. That may be what Eureka Jim is referring to.


Ray
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
Originally Posted by Norcal Dave
I'm going to be re-installing my fuel tank with a new sending unit and fuel lines and am wondering what I should use to seal the screws that hold the sending unit in, the sending unit gasket, and whether I should use anything on the threads at the bottom of the tank where the valve screws on. I was thinking of using teflon tape on any threads. I don't want to have to do this twice!

Any help appreciated. Thanks.

You don't need anything on any of those places. The factory used nothing. The gasket seals. The pipe threads seal. Any flare fittings will seal.
It's a must to know which of your trucks you are talking about when you post any question. 1950 or 1963.

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Bartamos- I'm talking about the '50 truck. The flare fittings I will install of course without any additional product, but I'm very leery of putting a tank in the cab without anything on the screws... these days I have to wonder whether the replacement screws are as well made as the ones that the tank came with- they may not be.

Jim & Ray- thanks for the info. I like using cork when I can find it.

I installed a tank in our '63 and I swear the thing is venting through the screws. I did not put anything on them.





~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
Dave, the standard 5 screw sender flange has a rubber gasket. This gasket is very adequate. It's only splash "pressure". It won't leak. The screws won't leak.
If I had a AD, I would use/modify a TF sender/pickup. They draw from the top. So do 60-66. Plug the tank at bottom with pipe plugs, no valve. The 59 motor you have in the 50 has a fuel pump designed to draw from a top outlet sender. So no worries there. These say they work with your tank. 49-53 and 54-59 ??? check it out
Have not read on here that anyone has used this on 49-53. But the web says it works. This style avoids leaks in cab.


Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Thanks Bartamos- I'll research the top draw further.

Dave


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
I have a top loading fuel sending unit on a 49-53 tank with the rubber gasket and it works. The holes in the gasket are smaller in diameter than the screws, providing a good seal. Mine did not leak even with the extreme tank pressure caused by the stupid aftermarket non-vented gas caps.
If you can't get your tank to seal with the rubber gasket, you need to look closer at the surfaces which you are trying seal.


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Ok, I am now armed with a lot of info here. I'll try to rubber gasket first.

Thanks again


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
I have had trouble with vented caps also. Now I drill a 3/32 hole in the cap.

Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
3/32" would be better than 1/8" in most cases for me since I can never seem to be able to find my 1/8" bit.
Would 5/64" work, or would that be too small?

Last edited by 52Carl; 07/18/2017 5:43 PM.

1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
5/32 is bigger than an 1/8.

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Yeah, I just tested the new cap that I got and I can suck air through it from the inside, but it will not vent out the other way...so hot days will cause a pressure build up in the tank. I expect that this could be bad for the fuel pump diaphragm and possibly forcing fuel beyond the carb float needle, and creating leaks/smells? Anyway, are you drilling a hole in the valve inside the cap, or actually in the cap itself?

Another full system question:

I am going to make my own 5/16 hard lines going from the flex line at the tank to the fuel pump- I usually have a flexible line at the pump end as well for engine movement, but the truck didn't have one when I got it- the hard line went straight to the pump. Is this the way the truck fuel line is supposed to be plumbed?

Thanks for the tips guys.

Last edited by Norcal Dave; 07/18/2017 11:37 AM.

~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Bubba - Curmudgeon
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 29,262
1950 truck?

I think there was only one flex fuel line - at the tank.

Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
N
'Bolter
'Bolter
N Offline
Joined: Oct 2016
Posts: 916
Yes Tim, the '50 truck. Thank you


~ Dave
1950 Chevrolet 3600 3/4-ton with 261 engine & T5 Transmission
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
5
Renaissance Man
Renaissance Man
5 Offline
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,059
Originally Posted by bartamos
5/32 is bigger than an 1/8.
Reread my post. It clearly reads "5/64"...???


1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
B
Sir Searchalot
Sir Searchalot
B Offline
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,988
It says 5/64 After the edit.

Dave. The hole goes inside the sealing gasket perimeter. Just drill thru the cap where it will let air pass out of tank but not damage any valves, seals or other cap feature.

It is probably best to have rubber hose between tank/body and metal line that is hard mounted to frame. There is some movement between body and frame. Likewise at other end up to pump. There is movement between motor and frame.

The hole could be small, as Carl says, as long as it doesn't whistle like a tea kettle smile
Glad Carl confirmed that the top draw works. Other AD's will be interested in that. I was worried that since the 5 hole is not symmetrical and is "clocked", that that might cause the outlet to be aimed wrong and/or the pickup/float to hit side of tank.


Moderated by  Phak1, Woogeroo 

Link Copied to Clipboard
Home | FAQ | Gallery | Tech Tips | Events | Features | Search | Hoo-Ya Shop
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0
(Release build 20240826)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 8.3.11 Page Time: 0.057s Queries: 14 (0.054s) Memory: 0.6752 MB (Peak: 0.7928 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2025-09-22 15:36:27 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS