Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
3 members (TUTS 59, JW51, Jon G),
114
guests, and
4
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,095 Posts1,056,480 Members48,444 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 12 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 12 | I own an all original 54' 3100 with 3spd (small trans) column shift, torque tube, 6v. I love the truck but always wished it was a 4spd floor shift with a taller set of gears in the back. I have recently come across a 53' complete rolling chassis with a 4spd and torque tube. For the minds within.... Can I simply swap the trans with crossmember and torque tube? The 53' 4spd has a rear cross member where as my 54' 3spd does not. The rear engine mounts at bell housing are different on the 53'. Can I use my 54' bell housing? It would sure be nice if I could build the 53' torque tube and 4spd and swap over to the 54'. Any shared knowledge would be greatly appreciated. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 | Top gear is still direct on a 420, so, don't count on going any faster. Get out your tape and measure for the rest.
Ed
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | saratoga54,
The 420 Ed referred to is an SM420, the optional 4-speed transmission from 1948-1954 - these years had a torque-tube rear end.
As Ed posted, the top gear on the 3-speed and the 4-speed are the same (1:1 ratio/drive). The 3-speed and 4-speed manual enclosed driveshaft transmissions in those years are the same length.
Regarding the clutch housing and the need for a rear-transmission frame crossmember: - the rear-engine frame crossmember changed in 1954 - the clutch housing also changed in 1954 - these changes allowed the elimination of a rear transmission cross member in 1954 (for 3-speed and 4-speed transmissions)
The 1953 rear end was 4.11 The 1954 rear end was 3.90 (lower revs at higher speeds) Either/both rear-ends can be converted to 3.55 (check the Tech Tip - Engines section) | | | | | Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 583 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2011 Posts: 583 | Not familiar with the 3 or 4 speed transmissions mentioned above. Would they function the same as the 3 or 4 speed transmissions from 1939, the 3 speed has synchronizers and the 4 speed doesn't? In which case the 4 speed had to be double clutched.
Rick
1939 Chevrolet Stake Truck
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | The 1948-1954 transmissions mentioned above all have synchronized gears.
Those 1948-54 transmission have different lengths than earlier transmissions. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,321 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,321 | The torque tube should be the same length,I used a 51 torque tube in my 54 the 51 had a 3 spd,and my 54 has a 4 spd. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | The 3-speed and 4-speed torque-tubes are the same length (48-54), except for the shorter torque-tube with the 1954 Hydra-Matic transmission. | | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 | To answer your question directly - yes, it will be a bolt-in swap. You will however have to change the gear in the rearend if you want to lower your cruising speed RPMs.
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 | Wait - now I'm confused. I have never seen a 47-54 model truck with a factory rear crossmember. Maybe I'm confused about what you all are referring to as the "rear crossmember". All of these trucks that I ever worked on had a midships style crossmember that the bellhousing sat on and then the transmission just hung off the bellhousing and had no more mounts aft of that position. My idea of of a 'rear crossmember' is one that mounts to the tailshaft housing of the transmission.
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 | From '47-'53 the bellhousing crossmember mount pads were parallel to the ground, in '54 and first series '55 the crossmember was very similar except the mounts became angled - most likely to combat engine/trans movement. The bellhousing style also changed to accommodate this change.
The SM420 will bolt directly to either style bellhousing/crossmember combination and work.You should be able to remove the 3-speed torque tube trans from your '54 and install the the SM420 4-speed onto the same bellhousing using the same clutch, etc, etc. It should bolt right in.
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | Wait - now I'm confused. I have never seen a 47-54 model truck with a factory rear crossmember. Maybe I'm confused about what you all are referring to as the "rear crossmember". All of these trucks that I ever worked on had a midships style crossmember that the bellhousing sat on and then the transmission just hung off the bellhousing and had no more mounts aft of that position. My idea of of a 'rear crossmember' is one that mounts to the tailshaft housing of the transmission. A rear transmission frame crossmember and rear-transmission mount was standard equipment prior to 1954 (allowing the rear transmission mount that "mounts to the tailshaft housing of the transmission" where the torque-tube cover attached to the transmission). The 1954 change in the geometry of frame cross-member under the rear of the engine allowed the elimination a rear transmission frame crossmember (on 3-speed and 4-speed, but not with a Hydra-Matic). | | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 | I guess most of my confusion is because most of these trucks that I have messed with have not been half tons. I do know for a fact though that my dad's '52 3100 which originally had a 4-speed and a torque tube setup in it did not have a tailshaft mount or crossmember. I know this because I personally removed the drivetrain from that truck and there was no crossmemeber in that location. Only at the bellhousing position. I had to cut out the bellhousing crossmember because I installed a later model 250 L6 with a TH350 trans.
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 | I just located this picture - I swear that crossemember in the rear was not on the truck my dad had. Either I'm losing my mind or his truck had a bastard chassis that didn't belong under it. http://i161.photobucket.com/albums/t204/ctm_motortrends/CHEVY49/2010436.jpg
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 |
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | Many rear cross members were apparently removed when people removed/replaced/repaired transmissions. By the way, this pertains to 1/2 ton trucks. | | | | | Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,286 Renaissance Man | | Renaissance Man Joined: Mar 2010 Posts: 10,286 | Mechaic58, look for bolt holes in the frame in the area of where the the torque tube ball is located. The rear cross member was held on by 3 bolts on each end. Two bolts went through the side of the frame, and one through the bottom.
1952 5-window - return to "as built" condition | 1950 3100 with a 235 and a T-5 transmission
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Oct 2013 Posts: 331 | Thanks Carl - it's a moot point now, he no longer has the truck. There's no telling what was going on there. That truck had a hard life before we got it, I'm sure it was subject to many a shadetree during its life.
1950 4100 - unrestored and driven weekly for almost no reason at all.
| | | | | Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 12 New Guy | | New Guy Joined: Apr 2012 Posts: 12 | Thanks to all for the response. Looks like I'll find a set of 3.55 gears and get started. One last question.. The Filling station has 3.55 gear set that they say will fit 47-53 gear housing. Why would you think it would not fit the 54 housing? Curious! Thanks again for the valued responses.
Last edited by saratoga54; 01/08/2017 4:05 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 Bubba - Curmudgeon | | Bubba - Curmudgeon Joined: Sep 2001 Posts: 29,270 | You will need to use a 1948-1953 3100 ring-gear carrier. I have done this twice - no problems.
Mothertrucker sells the R&P set at the best price. Classic Parts sells the installation kit - it is worth buying/using. SWEET has a written a very good Tech Tip here (link to Tech Tips at the top of this page). | | |
| |