Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | | Forums66 Topics128,026 Posts1,055,404 Members48,422 | | Most Online14,466 Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down with Ads! Again, thanks! | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | Is the GM T-5 transmission out of an S-10 have the proven strength to handle a reasonable built GMC 270? I have a few different flavors of T-5's, Astro from a 4.3, Camaro from a 4.3, Camaro from a 5.7 and several S-10's. I have not thought of using one on an older pick-up but am now considering a future project. Your thoughts please... Al PS: NO FORD T-5's! | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | The T5 (1993 S10 and 1988-92 Camaro/Firebird) is rated for about 300ft-lb of torque and 250 HP. The WC versions are rated a little higher than the earlier versions. I like the V6 Camaro versions and V6 S10 versions with the 0.72 OD gear which matches nicely with a 3.73 or 3.42 rear.
What kind of power does a "reasonably built GMC 270" make? | | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | Lugnutz, You pose a very valid question regarding the ft-lb and HP of a 270. I am not sure, but I would guess a good target would be 125 to 150 HP? I have run more than a few of the T-5's and do like that they shift nicely though may not be the strongest. Al | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | Lugnutz, You pose a very valid question regarding the ft-lb and HP of a 270. I am not sure, but I would guess a good target would be 125 to 150 HP? I have run more than a few of the T-5's and do like that they shift nicely though may not be the strongest. Al Well I guess the weight of the truck and whether or not you intend to tow stuff would dictate if a T5 would hold up or not. Can you elaborate more about the truck? I have a keen interest in any T5 related project. Jay
Last edited by Lugnutz; 02/06/2016 6:08 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 Crusing in the Passing Lane | | Crusing in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5,096 | The higher rated boxes have closer ratio gears with 1st., etc., being higher.
Ed
'37 GMC T-18 w/ DD 4-53T, RTO-610, 6231 aux., '95 GMC running gear, full disc brakes, power steering, 22.5 wheels and tires. '47 GMC 1 ton w/ 302, NP-540, 4wd, full width Blazer front axle. '54 GMC 630 w/ 503 gasser, 5 speed, ex fire truck, shortened WB 4', install 8' bed. '55 GMC 370 w/270, 420 4 speed, grain, dump bed truck from ND. Works OK.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | HMMMM....I thought all T-5's have a wide jump between 1st and 2nd. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | Hello Lugnutz, The potential project would be based on a 1946 Chev. 1/2 ton pickup (not good or complete or I would restore it). I have a rebuilt IHC 239 CID, 65 hp Diesel that I have contemplated using as the power and couple an S-10 or Astro T-5 to it. I would end up building a bell housing and of course doing all of the other adaptions. This project is down the list to about number 10, so it will not get any attention for a while. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | HMMMM....I thought all T-5's have a wide jump between 1st and 2nd. The S-10 trans. have wide ratios but the V-8 Cameros are close ratio. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | HMMMM....I thought all T-5's have a wide jump between 1st and 2nd. I have owned many different T5s so what I say is first hand knowledge from opening and inspecting them. V8 Camaro/Firebird T5 1st gear = 2.95 2nd gear = 1.94 3rd gear = 1.34 4th gear = 1.00 5th gear = 0.72 (but 0.63 is more common) V6 Camaro/Firebird T5 (these come in several versions but the most common is 1st gear = 3.758 2nd gear = 2.275 3rd gear = 1.42 4th gear = 1.0 5th gear = 0.72 A less common V6 Camaro/firebird version is 1st gear = 4.03 2nd gear = 2.37 3rd gear = 1.49 4th gear = 1.0 5th gear = 0.76 T5 from a V6 S10 or GMC Sonoma (this is the common gearing but not absolute) 1st gear = 3.758 2nd gear = 2.275 3rd gear = 1.42 4th gear = 1.0 5th gear = 0.72 T5 from a 4 cylinder Astro van 1st gear = 4.03 2nd gear = 2.37 3rd gear = 1.49 4th gear = 1.0 5th gear = 0.72 | | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | I want to make sure my thinking is straight. You have written the transmission gear ratios as a decimal per Astro: 1st gear 4.03 to 1 2nd gear 2.73 to 1 3rd gear 1.49 to 1 4th gear 1.00 to 1 5th gear 0.72 to 1 Does that mean in 5th gear that the out put of the transmission will see about a 25% over drive over 1 to 1 (direct drive) of fourth gear? I get confused with the gear ratio and what it means. I bought new, in 1986, and special ordered a 4.3 Astro with a T-5. After many miles, a transmission reb. and my teenage son rolling/totaling it, I bought back the salvage just to keep the T-5. This transmission I still have stored, with only a few miles on it! I junked the rest of the Van for at least double what the salvage was and still was able to keep the T-5! | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | I want to make sure my thinking is straight. You have written the transmission gear ratios as a decimal per Astro: 1st gear 4.03 to 1 2nd gear 2.73 to 1 3rd gear 1.49 to 1 4th gear 1.00 to 1 5th gear 0.72 to 1 Does that mean in 5th gear that the out put of the transmission will see about a 25% over drive over 1 to 1 (direct drive) of fourth gear? I get confused with the gear ratio and what it means. I bought new, in 1986, and special ordered a 4.3 Astro with a T-5. After many miles, a transmission reb. and my teenage son rolling/totaling it, I bought back the salvage just to keep the T-5. This transmission I still have stored, with only a few miles on it! I junked the rest of the Van for at least double what the salvage was and still was able to keep the T-5! Yes, the shift from 4th gear to 5th will cause a 28% drop in RPMs. That's a nice drop and matches well with a rear diff of 3.42 up to 4.10 in my opinion (3.73 rear diff is ideal IMO).
The T5 gears I mentioned above were in a T5 I pulled from a 1989 4 cylinder Astro van at the salvage yard. Not all Astro vans will have the same 1st and 2nd gear but they seem to all have a 0.72 or 0.73 5th gear according to THE BRITISH V8 WEBSITE chart (however I find that it is frequently wrong). The best way to check the gearing is to turn the shafts yourself. This LINK will take you to my T5 page which shows how to calculate the gears in 5 minutes (with a helper). Please visit my other T5 PAGES for lots of T5 reading. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | Ok, I scanned over your T-5 pages. Thanks for sharing your information. I will be using some of your ideas as I build my several transmissions. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2014 Posts: 385 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2014 Posts: 385 | Im using tag 145 right now. Thinking about changing to tag 148 or 149. This is a good link for tags and ratios. T5 info
Last edited by wolffcub; 02/08/2016 9:11 PM.
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2014 Posts: 385 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Sep 2014 Posts: 385 | Or possibly a 179 would be nice. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 Shop Shark | | Shop Shark Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 171 | This question is for you lugnutz. I can see where the GM derivatives of the T-5 are compatible. Does much interchange between the WC and typical T-5? My last question, how about the internal parts interchangeability between Ford and GM derivatives? One last thought, the bell housing bolt pattern on the T-5, that came off my 1986 4.3 Astro, must be a Ford Pattern. Was that a typical trick GM pulled in those days? I kept the Bell housing so I could use the trans. in the future on a Chev. project. Al | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | This question is for you lugnutz. I can see where the GM derivatives of the T-5 are compatible. Does much interchange between the WC and typical T-5? There are a few rules. A WC case MUST use a WC countershaft. A NWC case MUST use a NWC countershaft. The countershaft determines what gears are used on the main shaft. Essentially, the countershaft and main shaft gears are a matched set (1st thru 4th gears).
The World Class stuff is unique. The cases are different as well as the drive train gears and bearings. Basically, You cannot mix NWC and WC parts on the main shaft gear train. The exception is that you CAN use a NWC INPUT SHAFT in a WC tranny as long as you use a brass synchro ring. A WC INPUT SHAFT will work inside a NWC T5 - just use the correct fiber lined synchro.
A practical application is having a 1993 S10 WC T5 and wanting to do the Jeep shaft swap. The WC Jeep shafts are not available anymore. So just use a NWC Jeep IS and brass synchro. It works just fine.
Interesting tidbit: You CAN install a WC main shaft and gear train inside a NWC T5 as long as it has the correct NWC countershaft. That gives you a hybrid T5 with a WC main shaft and NWC countershaft inside a NWC case. However, I see no advantage to doing it unless you just can't get the correct parts for rebuilding the original WC T5 inside a WC case.
My last question, how about the internal parts interchangeability between Ford and GM derivatives? I have no experience on this subject. I've been told you can put Ford WC T5 parts inside a Chevy WC T5 case. I'd love to know if you can use a V8 Camaro WC input shaft in place of the Ford IS. Some of the Ford T5s have a 2.95 first gear, so it just might be possible. I'd love to know. See Ford V8 WC T5 with tag# 1352-115. The Ford main shaft has a different number of splines so you can't put Chevy gears on a Ford main shaft. The V8 Ford T5 has a nice 0.68 5th gear but must be used on a Ford main shaft.
Lock me in a room with a V8 Ford WC T5 and a V8 Chevy WC T5 and my tools. I'd love to explore the idea more.
One last thought, the bell housing bolt pattern on the T-5, that came off my 1986 4.3 Astro, must be a Ford Pattern. Was that a typical trick GM pulled in those days? I kept the Bell housing so I could use the trans. in the future on a Chev. project. Al Another Stovebolter sent me a photo of an Astro T5 with a Ford pattern case and it really surprised me. Not sure why they did that. I would love to know if your Astro T5 is WC or NWC. It probably has a 1351-101 tag. Glad you kept the bell. Smart.
Last edited by Lugnutz; 02/10/2016 3:00 AM.
| | | | | Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 108 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Feb 2008 Posts: 108 | Has anyone put a T-5 behind a 350? I have a '55 with 350 with a 4 speed leading into a rear end (4:11 ratio)out of the same Camaro. It really turns many rpm at road speed. I would like to know if the T5 will stand up to the 350 for cruises and highway driving; no racing! | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | Has anyone put a T-5 behind a 350? I have a '55 with 350 with a 4 speed leading into a rear end (4:11 ratio)out of the same Camaro. It really turns many rpm at road speed. I would like to know if the T5 will stand up to the 350 for cruises and highway driving; no racing! The T5 has been used behind the 350 by lots of folks. The Camaro forums have many members who use the T5 matched with a 350 SBC. I have met some as well at car shows. I also sold one to a man in Ohio who put it in his 55 Chevy with a 350 SBC. He loves it. He used the T5 to replace a Muncie T10 4 speed.
In my opinion, the only T5 that would work well with the 4:11 rear would be a world class T5 from a 1988-1992 V8 Camaro. The 0.63 OD gear would give you a nice drop in RPMs on the highway. The 2.95 first gear would make it usable. The V6 Camaro and S10 versions have a 3.75 or 4.03 1st gear and it would be like a granny gear. So the V8 Camaro would work best. | | | | | Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 Riding in the Passing Lane | | Riding in the Passing Lane Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 8,597 | I have a s-10 NWC T-5 in my 56 with a 350. It works great. I don't race it or do burnouts or such but I'm not afraid to get on it occasionaly. I have the 3:38 gears in the original rear end. They say money can't buy happiness. It can buy old Chevy trucks though. Same thing. 1972 Chevy c10 Cheyenne SuperIn the Gallery Forum | | | | | Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,361 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2013 Posts: 1,361 | Has anyone put a T-5 behind a 350? I have a '55 with 350 with a 4 speed leading into a rear end (4:11 ratio)out of the same Camaro. It really turns many rpm at road speed. I would like to know if the T5 will stand up to the 350 for cruises and highway driving; no racing! My 2 cents....it all depends on the driver. I have two T5 vehicles, one is my stock (ish) 51 3600 driver. It's running a 93 WC T5 from a S10, it's a great tranny that I doubt I could destroy with my 85 hp engine on a dare. The other's in my Guy toy...a 1990 Mazda Miata with a warmed up Ford 302. The V8 Miata is making around 300 hp to the rear wheels and I've had zero issues over 4 years and 10,000 miles of sometimes spirited sideways driving. The hard-to-fathom part of the story is the Miata's T5 is from a four cylinder Mustang with the small input shaft (have to run a pilot shaft bearing for a 87 diesel Ford Ranger in the crank). It's survived many many full throttle power shifts...The only reason it's still alive I suspect is a general lack of traction in the first few gears. The above said, I'd have no problems with any T5 in a normally driven 350 powered truck. Of course I'd much rather have a WC unit from a later model vehicle. Good Luck!
Last edited by moparguy; 05/10/2016 1:58 PM.
RonR
1951 3600 with Clark flatbed, T5, 4.10 rear 1970 340 Duster 1990 5.0 V8 Miata (1990 Mustang Gt Drivetrain) 1964 CJ5
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 | Been trying to read up on the T5 swap as Dad and I are researching what it takes, transmission wise for the drivetrain swap.
The stock driveline will come out to be replaced with a 283 SBC and I have a spare 2nd gen Camaro rear axle (need to measure to see if that will work).
But the million dollar question, what "general" year trans should we target? I know it dep new on the overall combo but looking to see what we should look for or what cars/truck years we should stay away from too. What is too new, too old, etc.
I assume the S10 T5s are hydraulic clutch? Is that any issue for the 50s trucks? And do you use he stock truck pedals??
Thanks!
1952 Chevy 3100 (235CI engine) ...T5 swap in progress...
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 | Also, what is a "good" price for a T5?
I'd like to have an idea so if I run across one that sounds good, it would be good to know if we should jump on the deal or not.
1952 Chevy 3100 (235CI engine) ...T5 swap in progress...
| | | | | Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,066 Bolter | | Bolter Joined: Oct 2002 Posts: 4,066 | Redryder pixMy HotrodA veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard, or reserve - is someone who, at one point in his or her life, wrote a blank check made payable to The 'United States of America', for an amount of "up to and including my life."I am fighting cancer and I am winning the fight | Pain is part of life; misery is an option. | | | | | Joined: Jul 2015 Posts: 203 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2015 Posts: 203 | Read everything that Lugnutz has written. You need an S10 tailshaft and I'd get a 14-spline Jeep input shaft. Speedway has a 14 spline clutch that works well. You'll probably have to custom make your shifter.
1953 GMC 1-Ton Pickup with 350 and 700R4
| | | | | Joined: Jul 2015 Posts: 203 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Jul 2015 Posts: 203 | I bought a used T5 out of a mid 80s Camaro for $80 and it was in good shape. I spent $50 on an S10 tailshaft and labor for a local shop to check it out, shim it and bolt on the tailshaft.
1953 GMC 1-Ton Pickup with 350 and 700R4
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | Read everything that Lugnutz has written. You need an S10 tailshaft and I'd get a 14-spline Jeep input shaft. Speedway has a 14 spline clutch that works well. You'll probably have to custom make your shifter. Jeep shafts come in 14 spline or 10 spline versions. The 10 spline version allows you to use the common 10 spline clutch package (same as the factory clutch). Speedway sells a 14 spline clutch which according to everything I have read, is the best choice if you want to stay with the S10 or V6 Camaro 14 spline input shaft. My preference is to do a 10 spline Jeep shaft swap for an S10 T5. For a V6 Camaro, it's a toss up. The input shaft splines are cut along the shaft much further than the S10. Therefore the clutch disc won't bind. Just cut a little off the pilot tip and install a Speedway clutch disc and away you go. Of course a tail housing swap and case cover is needed too. That's all for now. | | | | | Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 | Any certain year S10 transmissions that you prefer?
Just trying to figure out how to narrow the search!
Last edited by 4rcFed; 08/15/2016 3:03 AM.
1952 Chevy 3100 (235CI engine) ...T5 swap in progress...
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | Any certain year S10 transmissions that you prefer? Matching the rear axle gear to your OD gear is very important if you want it to perform properly.
I think the T5 from an S10 truck with a V6 works best for most. Those usually have a 0.72 OD gear. Here is a few general rules.
1993 and earlier S10 T5s have a Chevy bolt pattern where they bolt to the bell. Don't forget to look at 1993 and earlier GMC Sonoma and S15 trucks too.
A 4 cylinder truck usually has a 0.86 OD gear.
If you have a 3.73 or lower rear axle then you want the 0.72 OD gear.
If you have a 3.08 rear axle then you want the 0.86 OD gear.
If you have a 3.42 rear axle then a 0.86 OD gear works best if you don't have much HP. If you have a V8 engine then you could run a 3.42 rear with the 0.72 OD without any problems.
If you want your factory cable speedometer to work AND keep your bench seat, then you need a 1988 or earlier T5. All the 1992 and earlier Camaro and Firebird T5s have a cable speedo but the shifter location doesn't work with a bench seat.
I have a really nice T5 for sale. See LINK for 8/13/16 | | | | | Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 | Perfect info!!!
You bring up super good points. We want to keep the stock bench seat and stock speedo. So that helps a lot, as I'll see for a 1988-earlier S10/S15.
For one in unknown condition, what would you consider a price that you would jump on? Saw a few early 90's ones where locals wanted $500 which I thought was a little high, but can't use those anyway.
1952 Chevy 3100 (235CI engine) ...T5 swap in progress...
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | If the S10 T5 has a cable speedo output then $250 is fair if condition is unknown. If the same cable speedo S10 T5 has been gone through and has a guarantee then $500. Rebuilt then add another $200.
I suggest that you find an S10 T5 with a 0.72 OD even if it has a VSS speedo output. Drive it and use a GPS unit to know your speed. Later you might find a rare 1988 or earlier S10 T5 with a cable speedo. That would be a good time to swap. I look for those 1988 and earlier units almost daily on CL and I usually only find 2 a year. | | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | I sometimes find a decent S10 T5 at my local Pull-a-Part for about $130 plus I have 30 days to return it for any reason.
When I find them on CL it's more of a gamble. Maybe less of a gamble for me since I usually can repair simple stuff. I have extra parts in case you need something. Just ask.
I am always amazed how much people want for a transmission even though they have no idea if it's ready to be put into service. For the T5's with a VSS speedo and being sold "as is", I won't pay more than $100.
| | | | | Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 Wrench Fetcher | | Wrench Fetcher Joined: Dec 2015 Posts: 47 | ....I suggest that you find an S10 T5 with a 0.72 OD even if it has a VSS speedo output. Drive it and use a GPS unit to know your speed..... Would this still be a 1988 - or earlier unit, or what year are you referring to here?
1952 Chevy 3100 (235CI engine) ...T5 swap in progress...
| | | | | Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Sep 2011 Posts: 2,951 | Would this still be a 1988 - or earlier unit, or what year are you referring to here? The S10 T5 from 1983 - 1993 have the Muncie style case. The VSS speedo is found on 1989-1993. The Cable style speedo connection is 1988 and earlier. I suppose there are rare exceptions within the 1988-89 time period. | | |
| |