| |
Click on image for the lowdown. 
====
| | |
7 members (Otto Skorzeny, dt235sd, Cosmo, Hanks custodian, klhansen, JW51, Lostbuthaulinass),
105
guests, and
2
robots. | | Key: Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod | | | Forums66 Topics128,059 Posts1,055,825 Members48,426 | | Most Online14,466
Apr 26th, 2026 | | AD Chevy Trucks  Over 6,000 pictures Brad Allen has an awesome collection of Chevrolet factory pictures that he has set up from film strips. Check them out!
Lots of work on Brad's part ... pure enjoyment (and references) for you!
| | THANKS!
For helping keep this great
old truck web site
on the Internet for over 30 years! and not clogged down
with Ads!  Again, thanks!
| | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 27 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2005 Posts: 27 | What problems will I have putting my 49 bed on a 54 frame? The body fits great.Manfighter16 | | | | | Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,513 'Bolter | | 'Bolter Joined: Mar 2005 Posts: 1,513 | The rear part of the frame changed in 1954 from previous models due to the new box design. The kickup over the rear axle was reduced eliminating the wood blocks and the box was a little deeper with flat top rails. The only complication should be the right thickness of blocks to make it look right and match up with the splash aprons. Maybe somebody that has done it will chime in. Good luck.
Curt B.
1952 1300 Canadian 1/2 ton restomod You Tube | | | | | | Anonymous Unregistered | | Anonymous Unregistered | You can do it but you will have to use the spacer blocks in the rear in addition to the front. You may also have to change the side splash aprons between the bed and the running board to the 54-55.1 model to have it connect properly to the running boards. | | | | | Joined: May 2005 Posts: 27 Junior Member | | Junior Member Joined: May 2005 Posts: 27 | Thanks guys, I think I'll just put the box together and check the spacing. Manfighter16 | | |
|
|
| |
